Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Incorporation of Within-Season Yield Growth into a Mathematical Programming Sugarcane Harvest Scheduling Model

  • Michael E. Salassi (a1) (a2), Lonnie P. Champagne (a1) (a2) and Benjamin L. Legendre (a1) (a2)

Abstract

This study focuses on the development of a optimal harvest scheduling mathematical programming model which incorporates within-season changes in perennial crop yields. Daily crop yield prediction models are estimated econometrically for major commercially grown sugarcane cultivars. This information is incorporated into a farm-level harvest scheduling linear programming model. The harvest scheduling model solves for an optimal daily harvest schedule which maximizes whole farm net returns above harvesting costs. Model results are compared for a commercial sugarcane farm in Louisiana.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Alexander, Alex G.Chapter 11—Maturation and Natural Ripening, in Sugarcane Physiology,” A Comprehensive Study of the Saccharum Source-to-Sink System, Elsevier, 1973.
Barnes, A.C.The Sugar Cane, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1974.
Brumelle, Shelby, Granot, Daniel, Halme, Merja, and Vertinsky, Ilan, “A Tabu Search Algorithm for Finding Good Forest Harvest Schedules Satisfying Green-up Constraints,” European Journal of Operational Research 106 (1998):408424.
Chang, Y.S.The Trend of Sucrose Accumulation During Maturation of Sugarcane with Special Reference to the Maturity of Sugarcane Cultivars,” Report of the Taiwan Sugar Research Institute 148 (1995):19.
Crane, Donald R., Spreen, T.H., Alvarez, J., and Kidder, G.. An Analysis of the Stubble Replacement Decision for Florida Sugarcane Growers, Agricultural Experiment Station, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida. Bulletin 822, 1982.
Daust, David K., and Nelson, John D., “Spatial Reduction Factors for Strata-Based Harvest Schedules,” Forest Science 39 (1993):152165.
Faw, Wade E, 1998 Sugarcane Harvesting Schedule, Sugarcane Circular Letter No. 11-98, Louisiana Cooperative Extension Service, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center.
Griffiths, W.E., Hill, R.C., and Judge, G.G.. Learning and Practicing Econometrics, New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc, 1993.
Higgins, A.J., Muchow, R.C., Rudd, A.V., and Ford, A.W., “Optimising Harvest Date in Sugar Production: A Case Study for the Mossman Mill Region in Australia—I. Development of Operations Research Model and Solution,” Field Crops Research 57(1998):153162.
Lass, L.W., Callihan, R.H., and Everson, D.O., “Forecasting the Harvest Date and Yield of Sweet Corn by Complex Regression Models,” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 118(1993):450455.
Malezieux, E., “Predicting Pineapple Harvest Date in Different Environments, Using a Computer Simulation Model,” Agronomy Journal 86(1994):609617.
Millhollon, R.W., and Legendre, B.L., “Sugarcane Yield as Affected by Annual Glyphosate Ripener Treatments,” American Society of Sugar Cane Technologists Journal 16 (1996):712.
Muchow, R.C., Higgins, A.J., Rudd, A.V., and Ford, A.W., “Optimising Harvest Date in Sugar Production: A Case Study for the Mossman Mill Region in Australia—I. Sensitivity to Crop Age and Crop Class Distribution,” Field Crops Research 57(1998):243251.
Nelson, John, Douglas Brodie, J., and Sessions, John, “Integrating Short-Term, Area-Based Logging Plans with Long-Term Harvest Schedules,” Forest Science 37 (1991):101122.
Salassi, M.E., and Milligan, S.B., “Economie Analysis of Sugarcane Variety Selection, Crop Yield Patterns, and Ratoon Crop Plow Out Decisions,” Journal of Production Agriculture 10(1997):539545.
Semenzaio, R., “A Simulation Study of Sugar Cane Harvesting,” Agricultural Systems 47(1995):427437.
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Crop Production Annual Summary, 1996 annual summary, Cr Pr 2-1 (97), January 1997.
United States Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, Crop Production Annual Summary, 1999 annual summary, Cr Pr 2-1 (00), January 2000.
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Sugar and Sweetener Situation and Outlook Report, SSS-227, January 2000.
United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research ServiceU.S.-Mexico Sweetener Trade Mired in Dispute,” Agricultural Outlook, September 1999, pp. 1720.
Van Deusen, Paul C, “Habitat and Harvest Scheduling Using Bayesian Statistical Concepts,” Canadian Journal of Forest Research 26 (1996):13751383.
White, H., “A Heteroskedasticity-Consistent Co-variance Matrix Estimator and a Direct Test of Heteroskedasticity,” Econometrica 48(1980):817838.
Wolf, S., “Predicting Harvesting Date of Processing Tomatoes by a Simulation Model,” Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 111(1986):1116.

Keywords

Incorporation of Within-Season Yield Growth into a Mathematical Programming Sugarcane Harvest Scheduling Model

  • Michael E. Salassi (a1) (a2), Lonnie P. Champagne (a1) (a2) and Benjamin L. Legendre (a1) (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed