Skip to main content Accessibility help

Impacts of Incorporating Land Exchanges Between Forestry and Agriculture in Sector Models

  • Ralph J. Alig (a1), Darius M. Adams (a2) and Bruce A. McCarl (a3)


The forest and agriculture sectors are linked by having a portion of their land bases suitable for use in either sector. A substantial part of the southern land base is suitable for either forestry or agriculture use, with most of forestation on U.S. agriculture land in the South. We examine how land exchanges between forestry and agriculture are influenced by specific federal conservation and farm support policies, including changes in the Conservation Reserve Program. Reallocation of land is a significant part of the sectors' responses to the policies, along with intensification of timber management on existing southern forests.



Hide All
Adams, R., Adams, D., Callaway, J., Chang, C., and McCarl, B.. “Sequestering Carbon on Agricultural Land: Social Costs and Impacts on Timber Markets.” Contemporary Policy Issues XI(1993):7687.
Adams, D., Alig, R., Callaway, J., McCarl, B., and Winnett, S.. “The Forest and Agricultural Sector Optimization Model (FASOM):Model Structure and Policy Simulations.” Res. Pap. No. PNW-RP-495, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1996a.
Adams, D., Alig, R., McCarl, B., Callaway, J., and Winnett, S.. “An Analysis of the Impacts of Public Timber Harvest Policies on Private Forest Management in the U.S.” Forest Sci. 43,3(1996b):343-58.
Adams, D., and Haynes, R.. “The 1993 Timber Assessment Market Model: Structure, Projections, and Policy Simulations.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-368, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1996.
Alig, R., Adams, D., McCarl, B., Callaway, J., and Winnett, S.. “Assessing Effects of Mitigation Strategies for Global Climate Change with an Intertemporal Model of the U.S. Forest and Agriculture Sectors.” Environ, and Resour. Econ. 9(1997):259-74.
Alig, R., and Healy, R.. “Urban and Built-up Land Area Changes in the United States: An Empirical Investigation of Determinants.” Land Econ. 63(1987):215-26.
Alig, R., and Wear, D.. “Changes in Private Timberlands: Statistics and Projections for 1952 to 2040.” J. Forestry 90(1992):3137.
Binkley, C.Economic Models of Timber Supply.” In The Global Forest Sector: An Analytical Perspective, eds., Kallio, M., Dykstra, D., and Binkley, C., pp. 109-36. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1987.
Brooke, A., Kendrick, D., and Meeraus, A.. GAMS: A User's Guide, Release 2.25. San Francisco: The Scientific Press, 1992.
Chang, C., McCarl, B., Mjelde, J., and Richardson, J.. “Sectoral Implications of Farm Program Modifications.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 74(1992):3849.
Comolli, P.Principles and Policy in Forestry Economics.” Bell J. Econ. 12(1981):300-09.
Haynes, R., Adams, D., and Mills, J.. “The 1993 RPA Timber Assessment Update.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-259, USDA/Forest Service, Ft. Collins CO, 1995.
Ince, P.Recycling and Long-Range Timber Outlook.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. RM-242, USDA/Forest Service, Ft. Collins CO, 1994.
Johnson, N., and Scheurman, L.. Techniques for Prescribing Optimal Timber Harvests and Investment Under Different Objectives. Forest Science Monograph No. 18, Society of American Foresters, Washington DC, 1977.
McCarl, B.Cropping Activities in Agricultural Sector Models: A Methodological Proposal.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 64(1982):768-72.
McCarl, B., Chang, C., Atwood, J., and Nayda, W.. “ASM: The U.S. Agricultural Sector Model.” Draft report, Dept. of Agr. Econ., Texas A&M University, College Station, 1997.
McCarl, B., and Spreen, T.. “Price Endogenous Mathematical Programming as a Tool for Sector Analysis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):87102.
Meyers, W., Womack, A., Johnson, S., Brandt, J., and Young, R.. “Impacts of Alternative Programs Indicated by the FAPRI Analysis.” Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 69(1987):972-79.
Mills, J., and Kincaid, J.. “The Aggregate TimberLand Analysis System—ATLAS: A Comprehensive Timber Projection Model.” Gen. Tech. Rep. No. PNW-GTR-281, USDA/Forest Service, Portland OR, 1992.
Parks, P., and Hardie, I.. “Least-Cost Forest Carbon Reserves: Cost-Effective Subsidies to Convert Marginal Agricultural Land to Forests.” Land Econ. 71(1995):122-36.
Sedjo, R., and Lyon, K.. The Long-Term Adequacy of World Timber Supply. Washington DC: Resources for the Future, 1990.
Takayama, T., and Judge, G.. Spatial and Temporal Price and Allocation Models. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service. “The 1992 National Resource Inventory in the United States.” Unnumbered rep., USDA/NRCS, Washington DC, 1996.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. “The Second RCA Appraisal: Soil, Water, and Related Resources on Nonfederal Land in the United States—Analysis of Conditions and Trends.” Unnumbered rep., USDA/SCS, Washington DC, 1989.
Vesterby, M., Heimlich, R., and Krupa, K.. “Urbanization of Rural Land in the United States.“ Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 673, USDA/Economic Research Service, Washington DC, 1994.


Impacts of Incorporating Land Exchanges Between Forestry and Agriculture in Sector Models

  • Ralph J. Alig (a1), Darius M. Adams (a2) and Bruce A. McCarl (a3)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed