Skip to main content Accessibility help

Generalized Stochastic Dominance: An Empirical Examination

  • Bruce A. McCarl (a1)


Use of generalized stochastic dominance (GSD) requires one to place lower and upper bounds on the risk aversion coefficient. This study showed that breakeven risk aversion coefficients found assuming the exponential utility function delineate the places where GSD preferences switch between prospects. However, between these break points, multiple, overlapping GSD intervals can be found. Consequently, when one does not have risk aversion coefficient information, discovery of breakeven coefficients instead of GSD use is recommended. The investigation also showed GSD results are insensitive to wealth and data scaling but are sensitive to rounding.



Hide All
Danok, A.B. McCarl, B.A., and White, T.K.. “Machinery Selection Modeling: Incorporation of Weather Variability”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 62(1980):700708.
Goh, S. Shih, S., Cochran, M.J., and Raskin, R.. “A Generalized Stochastic Dominance Program for the IBM PC”. So. J. Agr. Econ., 21(1989):175182.
Hammond, J.S. “Simplifying the Choice Between Uncertain Prospects Where Preference is Nonlinear”. Management Sci., 20(1974): 10471072.
Kamien, M.I. and Schwartz, N.L.. Dynamic Optimization: The Calculus of Variations and Optimal Control in Economics and Management. New York, NY: Elsevier Scient Publishing Co., 1981.
King, R.P. and> Robison, L.J.. “An Interval Approach to the Measurement of Decision Maker Preference”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):510520.
Klemme, R.M. “A Stochastic Dominance Comparison of Reduced Tillage Systems in Corn and Soybean Productions Systems under Risk”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 67(1985):550557.
Kramer, R.A. and Pope, R.D.. “Participation in Farm Commodity Programs: A Stochastic Dominance Analysis”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 63(1981):119128.
McCarl, B.A. “Meyeroot Program Documentation”. Unpublished Computer Documentation, Department of Agricultural Economics, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX., 1990.
McCarl, B.A. “Preference Among Risky Prospects Under Constant Risk Aversion”. So. J. Agr. Econ., 20(2)(1988):2533.
McCarl, B.A. and Bessler, D.A.. “Estimating an Upper Bound on the Pratt Risk Aversion Coefficient When the Utility Function is Unknown”. Austral. J. Agr. Econ., 33(1989):5663.
Meyer, J. “Choice Among Distributions”. J. Econ. Theory, 14(1977):326336.
Meyer, J. STODOM Computer Program, Department of Economics, Texas A&M 1975.
Pratt, J.W. “Risk Aversion in the Small and in the Large”. Econometrica, 32(1964): 122136.
Raskin, R. and Cochran, M.J.. “Interpretation and Transformations of Scale for the Pratt-Arrow Absolute Risk Aversion Coefficient: Implications for Stochastic Dominance”. West. J. Agr. Econ., 11(1986):204210.
Tolley, H.D. and Pope, R.D.. “Testing for Stochastic Dominance”. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988):693700.
Von Neumann, J. and Morgenstern, O.. Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1947.


Generalized Stochastic Dominance: An Empirical Examination

  • Bruce A. McCarl (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed