Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-vvkck Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T15:27:26.717Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Feasibility of an Adaptable Biorefinery Platform: Addressing the Delivery Scale Dilemma under Drought Risk

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Michael C. Farmer ,
Aaron Benson ,
Xiaolan Liu ,
Sergio Capareda  and
Marty Middleton
Michael C. Farmer
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Aaron Benson
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Xiaolan Liu
Affiliation:
Illinois Institute for Rural Affairs, Western Illinois University, Macomb, Illinois
Sergio Capareda
Affiliation:
Biological and Agricultural Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
Marty Middleton
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas
Get access

Abstract

Conversion of biomass to electricity is often not economically feasible as a result of large transportation costs and low output prices. We build a model of an adaptable biorefinery situated at an agri-processing facility that already has biomass on-site and consider the optimal scale of the plant to achieve a price premium by selling peaking power given uncertain biomass deliveries year over year as a result of climatic variability. We find that, for conservative electricity prices, a plant situated near cotton gins in Texas could operate with positive expected net revenue while converting on average only 38% of available biomass for peak electricity prices.

Keywords

biomassbiorefinerydroughtQ4Q16
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , February 2014 , pp. 57 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aquino, F.L., Capareda, S.C., and Parnell, C.B. Jr. “Elucidating the Solid, Liquid and Gaseous Products from Batch Pyrolysis of Cotton Gin Trash.” Transactions of the ASABE 53(2010): 651–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruins, M., and Sanders, J.. “Small-Scale Processing of Biomass for Biorefinery.” Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining 6(2012): 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Capareda, S.C.“An Update on the Bio-Energy Conversion Processes Utilizing Cotton Gin Trash.” Paper presented at Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans, LA, January 4-7, 2010.Google Scholar
Curtis, W., Ferland, C., McKissick, J., and Barnes, W.. “The Feasibility of Generating Electricity from Biomass Fuel Sources in Georgia.” University of Georgia FR-03-06, 2003. Internet site: www.caes.uga.edu/center/caed/pubs/2003/documents/FR-03-06.pdf (Accessed December 12, 2012).Google Scholar
English, B.C., Ugarte, D.G. De La Torre, Walsh, M.E., Hellwinkel, C., and Menard, J.. “Economic Competitiveness of Bioenergy Production and Effects on Agriculture of the Southern Region.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 38(2006):389–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epplin, F.M., and Haque, M.. “Policies to Facilitate Conversion of Millions of Acres to the Production of Biofuel Feedstock.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 43(2011): 358–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Facchinetti, E., Gassner, M., D'Amelio, M., Marechal, F., and Favrat, D.. “Process Integration and Optimization of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell— Gas Turbine Hybrid Cycle Fueled with Hydrothermally Gasified Waste Biomass.” Energy 41(2012):408–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, R.L., English, B.C., and Noon, C.E.. “A Geographic Information System-Based Modeling System for Evaluating the Cost of Delivered Energy Crop Feedstock.” Biomass and Bioenergy 18(2000):309–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haq, Z. Biomass for Electricity Generation. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Independent Statistics and Analysis, Electricity Analysis Reports, 2002. Internet site: www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/analysispaper/biomass/index.html (Accessed March 16, 2010).Google Scholar
House Bill 8, American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012. 112th U.S. Congress (2011-2012).Google Scholar
Iakovou, E., Vlachos, D., and Toka, A.. “A Methodological Framework for Integrating Waste Biomass into a Portfolio of Thermal Energy Production Systems.” Waste to Energy, Green Energy and Technology. A. Karagiannidis, ed. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LePori, W.A., and Parnell, C.B.. “System and Process for Conversion of Biomass into Usable Energy.” U.S. Patent 4,848,249A, Washington, DC, July 18, 1989.Google Scholar
Lieuwen, T., and Yang, V.. “Combustion Instabilities in Gas Turbine Engines: Operational Experience, Fundamental Mechanisms, and Modeling.” Progress in Astronautics and Aeronautics. Lu, Frank K., ed. Reston, VA: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., 2006.Google Scholar
Liu, X., Farmer, M., and Capareda, S.. “The Economic Feasibility of Electricity Generation from Biomass on the South Plains of Texas.” The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization. Schmitz, A., Wilson, N., Moss, C., and Zilberman, D., eds. Sharjah, United Arab Emirates: Bentham Science Publishers, 2011.Google Scholar
Maxwell, T. (PI) “Efficient Energy Storage and Use on DoD Installations,” FY 2012 Environmental Security Technology Certification Program (ESTCP)—Installation Energy, Pre-proposal Submitted through US Army Core of Engineers, Engineer Research and Development Center, Request $3,750,000, March 2011.Google Scholar
McCarl, B.A. “Economic Potential of Biomass Based Fuels from Agricultural Sources.” Paper presented at Sustainable Energy: New Challenges for Agriculture and Implications for Land Use, Wageningen, The Netherlands, May 18-20, 2000.Google Scholar
Multer, C.L., Parnell, C.B. Jr, McGee, R.O., and Capareda, S.C.. “Benefits of On-Site Power Production for Cotton Gins.” Paper presented at Beltwide Cotton Conferences, New Orleans, LA, January 4-7, 2010.Google Scholar
National Climatic Data Center, U.S. Department of Commerce. COOP Data and Records of Climatological Observations, U.S. Station, Lubbock, TX. National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service (NESDIS). Internet site: www.ncdc.noaa.gov/oa/mpp/freedata.html (Accessed July 28, 2010).Google Scholar
Popp, M., Nalley, L., and Vickery, G.. “Irrigation Restriction and Biomass Market Interactions: The Case of the Alluvial Aquifer.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 42(2010): 69–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richard, T.L. “Challenges in Scaling Up Biofuels Infrastructure.” Science 329(2010):793–796.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Singh, J., and Gu, S.. “Commercialization Potential of Microalgae for Biofuels Production.” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 14,9(2010):2596–2610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tremel, A., Gaderer, M., and Spliethoff, H.. “Small-Scale Production of Synthetic Natural Gas by Allothermal Biomass Gasification.” International Journal of Energy Research 37,11(2012):1318–1330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Texas Cotton Ginners' Association (Southwest Edition). Ginners' Red Book. Austin, TX, 2008. Texas State Energy Conservation Office. Internet site: www.seco.cpa.state.tx.us/re/rps-portfolio.php (Accessed April 16, 2013).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2006. Crop Production, 2007 Summary. Cr Pr 2-1 (06). January.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Crop Production, 2001-2008 Summary. Cr Pr 2-1 (01-08). January 2002-January 2009.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. 2008. International Energy Outlook 2008. Energy Information Administration. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting. DOE/EIA-0484(2008). Washington, D.C. September 2008. 250 p.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. 2012. “Peak Underground Working Natural Gas Storage Capacity.” Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. Washington, D.C. September 2012.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy 2013. Annual Energy Outlook 2013: with projections to 2040. Energy Information Administration. Office of Integrated Analysis and Forecasting. DOE/EIA-0383(2013>). Washington, D.C. April 2013. 244 p.).+Washington,+D.C.+April+2013.+244+p.>Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. Annual Energy Outlook 2013: Market Trends - Natural Gas. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. DOE/EIA-0383(2013). Washington, D.C. April 2013a.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Energy. Annual Energy Outlook 2013: Market Trends — Electricity. Energy Information Administration. Independent Statistics and Analysis. DOE/EIA-0383(2013). Washington, D.C. April 2013.Google Scholar
U.S. Energy Information Administration. Residential Electricity Prices: A Consumer's Guide Brochure #DOE/EIA-X061. Washington, DC, 2008.Google Scholar
Walker, M. “Solving for the Optimal Capacity and Profit Maximization for a Biomass Refinery Given Supplemental Sources of Fuel.” MS thesis, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, May 2012.Google Scholar
West, M. Personal communication. Spread Eagle Power, Amarillo, TX. June 2010.Google Scholar
Wilde, C, Johnson, J., and Farmer, M.. “Inventory of Cotton Gin Trash on the Texas High Plains and Bio-Energy Feedstock Potentials.” Texas Journal of Agriculture and Natural Resources 23(2010):42–49.Google Scholar