Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Breeding Technologies in U.S. Hog Production

  • Jeffrey M. Gillespie (a1), Christopher G. Davis (a2) and Noro C. Rahelizatovo (a1)

Abstract

An important aspect of structural change in the U.S. hog industry has been the adoption of breeding technology. The adoption of each of four breeding technologies, weekly farrowing, intensive breeding, terminal crossbreeding, and artificial insemination, in U.S. hog production is analyzed using multivariate probit analysis. Results suggest that diversification, whether the producer raised breeding stock, debt and asset levels, and producer's education influence adoption rate. Larger, more risk-averse producers were more likely to adopt technology. Producers who rated the quality of labor available as higher were more likely to adopt management-intensive technologies.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Anderson, D.P., Wilson, P.N., and Thompson, G.D.. “The Adoption and Diffusion of Level Fields and Basins.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24,1(July 1999):186203.
Basarir, A.Multidimensional Goals of Farmers in the Beef Cattle and Dairy Industries.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, January 2002.
Bock, R.D., and Gibbons, R.D.. “High Dimensional Multivariate Probit Analysis.Biometrics 52(1996):118394.
Boehlje, M.Alternative Models of Structural Change in Agriculture and Related Industries.Agribusiness 8,3(May 1992):219–31.
Cardona, H.Analysis of Policy Alternatives in the Implementation of a Coastal Non-point Pollution Control Program for Agriculture.” Ph.D. dissertation, Louisiana State University, August 1999.
Caswell, M.F., and Zilberman, D.. “The Choices of Irrigation Technology in California.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67(May 1985):224–34.
Chib, S., and Greenberg, E.. “Analysis of Multivariate Probit Models.Biometrika 85(1998):347–61.
Cochrane, W.Farm Prices: Myth and Reality. St. Paul: University of Minnesota Press, 1958.
Dillman, D.A.The Design and Administration of Mail Surveys.Annual Review of Sociology 17(1991):225–49.
Dorfman, J.H.Modeling Multiple Adoption Decisions in a Joint Framework.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(August 1996):547–57.
Fausti, S.W., and Gillespie, J.M.. “A Comparative Analysis of Risk Preference Elicitation Procedures Using Mail Survey Results.” Paper presented at the annual meetings of the Western Agricultural Economics Association, Vancouver, Canada, July 2000.
Feder, G.Adoption of Interrelated Agricultural Innovations: Complementarity and the Impacts of Risk, Scale, and Credit.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64(1982):94101.
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D.. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries.Economic Development and Cultural Change 30(January 1985):5976.
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Beach, E.D., and Huang, W.-Y.. “The Adoption of IPM Techniques by Vegetable Growers in Florida, Michigan and Texas.Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 25,1(July 1994):158–72.
Foster, K., Hurt, C., and Hale, J.. “Chapter 2: Comparison of Production Systems.” Positioning Your Pork Operation for the 21” Century. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Cooperative Extension Service, Purdue University, 1995.
Gillespie, J.M., and Fulton, J.R.. “Entry, Exit and Changes in the Size of Hog Production Firms in the U.S.: A Markov Chain Analysis.Agribusiness 17(Fall 2001):557–70.
Gillespie, J.M., Karantininis, K., and Storey, G.G.. “The Expansion and Evolution of Vertical Coordination in the Quebec Hog Industry.Review of Agricultural Economics 19,2(Fall-Winter 1997):350–70.
Greene, W.H.LIMDEP Version 7.0 User's Manual, Revised Edition. New York: Econometric Software, Inc., 1998.
Greene, W.H.Econometric Analysis. 4th Edition. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 2000.
Griliches, Z.Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change.Econometrica 25,4(October 1957):501–22.
Johnson, N.L., and Ruttan, V.W.. “The Diffusion of Livestock Breeding Technology in the U.S.: Observations on the Relationship Between Technical Change and Industry Structure.Journal of Agribusiness 15,1(Spring 1997):1935.
Jones, D., Hurt, C., and Hale, J.. “Chapter 13: Throughput and Near Optimum Conversion.” Positioning Your Pork Operation for the 21” Century. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Cooperative Extension Service, Purdue University, 1995.
Kuhlers, D.L., Jungst, S.B., and Little, J.A.. “An Experimental Comparison of Equivalent Terminal and Rotational Crossbreeding Systems in Swine: Pig Performance.Journal of Animal Science 72(1994):257884.
Marra, M.C, and Carlson, G.A.. “Agricultural Technology and Risk, Chapter 15.” The Role of Risk in Agriculture. Just, R. and Pope, R., eds. Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publications, 2002.
Marra, M.C., Hubbell, B.J., and Carlson, G.A.. “Information Quality, Technology Depreciation, and Bt Cotton Adoption in the Southeast.Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 26,1(July 2001):158–75.
Perrin, R., and Winkleman, D.. “Impediments to Technical Progress on Small Versus Large Farms.American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(1976):888–94.
Rauniyar, G.P., and Goode, EM.. “Technology Adoption on Small Farms.World Development 20(February 1992):275–82.
Reimund, D.A., Martin, J.R., and Moore, C.V.. Structural Change in Agriculture: The Experience for Broilers, Fed Cattle, and Processing Vegetables. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economics and Statistics Service, Technical Bulletin No. 1648, 1981.
Singleton, W., and Schinckel, A.. “Chapter Eight: Artificial Insemination and Genetics.” Positioning Your Pork Operation for the 21” Century. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue Cooperative Extension Service, Purdue University, 1995.
Smale, M., and Heisey, P.W.. “Simultaneous Estimation of Seed-Fertilizer Adoption Decisions: An Application to Hybrid Maize in Malawi.Technological Forecasting and Social Change 43(May-June 1993):353–68.
Soule, M.J.Soil Management and the Farm Typology: Do Small Family Farms Manage Soil and Nutrient Resources Differently than Large Family Farms?Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 30,2(October 2001):179–88.
Zepeda, L.Adoption of Capital Versus Management Intensive Technologies.Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 38(April 1990):457–69.

Keywords

Factors Influencing the Adoption of Breeding Technologies in U.S. Hog Production

  • Jeffrey M. Gillespie (a1), Christopher G. Davis (a2) and Noro C. Rahelizatovo (a1)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed