Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T22:53:51.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Exits Among U.S. Burley Tobacco Growers After the End of the Federal Tobacco Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 January 2015

Kelly J. Tiller ,
Shiferaw T. Feleke  and
Jane H. Starnes
Kelly J. Tiller
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Shiferaw T. Feleke
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Jane H. Starnes
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study explores the relationship between family/farm characteristics and the probability of exiting burley tobacco farming in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia. Following the termination of the federal tobacco program in 2004, 54% of burley tobacco-growing households in Tennessee, North Carolina, and Virginia. exited burley tobacco farming by 2006. Tobacco yield, tobacco farm cash receipts, tobacco price, off-farm employment, and farm size are the most dominant variables discriminating between exiting and surviving tobacco farms. Data for this study came from a mail survey of burley tobacco producers in Tennessee, Virginia, and North Carolina in May 2006.

Keywords

burley tobaccoexitfederal tobacco programC25Q12Q18
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , May 2010 , pp. 161 - 175
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baggs, J. “Firm Survival and Exit in Response to Trade Liberalization.” The Canadian Journal of Economics. Revue Canadienne d'Economique 38(2005):1364–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beach, R.H., Richmond, D.W., Austin, W.D., and Jones, A.S. “How Will Tobacco Households Respond to the Quota Buyout? Findings from a Survey of North Carolina Tobacco Households.” Selected Paper Presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Orlando, Florida, February 4-8, 2006.Google Scholar
Beach, R.H., Jones, A.S., and Tooze, J.A. “Tobacco Farmer Interest and Success in Income Diversification.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 40(2008):53–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belsley, D., Kuh, E., and Welsch, R.Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1980.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bragg, L.A., and Dalton, T.J. “Factors Affecting the Decision to Exit Dairy Farming: A Two-stage Regression Analysis.” Journal of Dairy Science 87(2004):3092–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Breustedt, G., and Glauben, T. “Driving Forces behind Exiting from Farming in Western Europe.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 58(2007):115–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, B.A., Rucker, R.R., and Thurman, W.N. “The End of the Federal Tobacco Program: Economic Impacts of the Deregulation of U.S. Tobacco Production.” Review of Agricultural Economics 29(2007):635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtin, R., Presser, S., and Singer, E. “The effects of Response Rate Changes on the Index of Consumer Sentiment.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2000) :413-28.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Beach, E.D., and Huang, W.The Adoption of Integrated Pest Management Technologies by Vegetable Growers. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Resources and Technology Division, Staff Report No. AGES 9228, 1992.Google Scholar
Fernandez-Cornejo, J.Off-farm Income, Technology Adoption, and Farm Economic Performance. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Report No. ERR-36, 2007.Google Scholar
Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO). Projections of Tobacco Production, Consumption and Trade to the Year 2010. Rome: FAO, 2003.Google Scholar
Glauben, T., Tietje, H., and Weiss, C. “Agriculture on the Move: Exploring Regional Differences in Farm Exit Rates.” Jahrbuch fur Regionalwissenschaft 26(2006):103–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goddard, E., Weersink, A., Chen, K., and Turvey, CG. “Economics of Structural Change in Agriculture.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 1(1993):475–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goetz, S.J., and Debertin, D.L. “Why Farmers Quit: A Country Level Analysis.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83(2001):1010–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodwin, B., and Mishra, A. “Farming Efficiency and the Determinants of Multiple Job Holdings by Farm Operators.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86(2004):722–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W.H.Economic Analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 2003.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R.A. “Retired Farm Operators: Who Are They?” Rural Development Perspectives 11(1996):28–35.Google Scholar
Hoppe, R., and Korb, P.Understanding U.S. Farm Exits. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Report No. ERR-21, 2006.Google Scholar
Keeter, S., Miller, C., Kohut, A., Groves, R.M., and Presser, S. “Consequences of Reducing Non-response in a National Telephone Survey.” Public Opinion Quarterly 64(2000):125–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimhi, A., and Bollman, R. “Family Farm Dynamics in Canada and Israel: The Case of Farm Exits.” Journal of Agricultural Economics 21(1999):69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kranenburg, H.L., Palm, F.C., and Pfann, G.A. “Exit and Survival in a Concentrating Industry: The Case of Daily Newspapers in The Netherlands.” Review of Industrial Organization 21(2002):283–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myer, R.H., and Montgomery, D.Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization Using Designed Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1995.Google Scholar
Nehring, R., Fernandez-Cornejo, J., and Banker, D. “Off-Farm Labor and the Structure of U.S. Agriculture: The Case of Corn/Soybean Farms.” Applied Economics 37(2005):633–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perez, S., Llopis, A., and Llopis, J. “The Determinants of Survival of Spanish Manufacturing Firms.” Review of Industrial Organization 25(2004):251–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Presidential Commission on Improving Economic Opportunity in Communities Dependent on Tobacco Production While Protecting Public Health. Tobacco at a Crossroad: A Call for Action. Final Report, May 14, 2001.Google Scholar
Ratner, B.Statistical Modeling and Analysis for Database Marketing: Effective Techniques for Mining Big Data. Chapman and Hall. CRC, 2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Serletis, G.S., and Fetzer, J.J.Modeling the Impact of the U.S. Tobacco Quota Buyout. Washington, DC: Office of Economics, U.S. International Trade Commission, Working Paper, No. 2008-06-A, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, K.R.Does Off-Farm Work Hinder “Smart” Farming? Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, AGO-294, 2002.Google Scholar
Snell, W.The Buyout: Short-Run Observations and Implications for Kentucky's Tobacco Industry. Lexington, KY: Cooperative Extension Services, University of Kentucky, 2005.Google Scholar
Snell, W., Powers, L., and Halich, G.Tobacco Economics in the Post-Buyout Era. Lexington, KY: University of Kentucky, 2008.Google Scholar
Tiller, K.J., and Brown, J.G. “Proposed Tobacco Quota Buyout Legislation: Effects on Tennessee Tobacco Farms.” Selected Paper Presented at the Southern Agricultural Economics Association Annual Meeting, Mobile, Alabama, February 2-5, 2003.Google Scholar
Tiller, K.J. “Burley Tobacco Situation and Outlook.” Farm Financial Outlook: Proceedings of Ag Lender Seminars. Plain, R.L. and White, J., eds. Columbia, MO: University of Missouri, 2005.Google Scholar
Tiller, K.J., Capehart, T., and Tegenge, F.Tobacco Quota Buyout: Impacts on Tobacco Households, Farming, and Tobacco-Growing Regions. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Cooperative Agreement No. 43-3AEK-9, 2006.Google Scholar
Tsionas, E.G., and Papadogonas, T.A. “Firm Exit and Technical Inefficiency.” Empirical Economics 31(2006):535–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA). 2007 Census of Agriculture, State Summary Highlights. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service, 2007.Google Scholar
Womack, J.Tobacco Quota Buyout Proposals in the 108 Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 2003.Google Scholar
Womack, J.Tobacco Quota Buyout Proposals in the 108 Congress. Washington, DC: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, 2004.Google Scholar