Skip to main content Accessibility help

Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction

  • Rodney Jones (a1), Tyler Turner (a1), Kevin C. Dhuyvetter (a1) and Thomas L. Marsh (a2)


The genetic traits of a purebred bull convey the reproductive and economic value to buyers. This study examines and compares the value of actual production weights (birth, weaning, and yearling weight), production expected progeny differences (EPDs) (birth, weaning, milk, and yearling), and ultrasound EPDs (carcass quality predictors) for purebred Angus bulls sold at auction. One EPD, birth weight, was valued by buyers more than its corresponding actual weight, though both actual weights and EPDs significantly impact price. Predictors of carcass quality were important in determining price. Finally, several individual animal factors and sale characteristics were significant in determining price.



Hide All
American Angus Association. Sire Evaluation Report. Internet site: (Accessed June 28, 2007).
Beef Improvement Federation. Guidelines for Uniform Beef Improvement Programs, 8th ed. Athens, GA: Beef Improvement Federation, Publisher, 2002.
Benyshek, L.L., Johnson, M.H., Little, D.E., Bertrand, J.K., and Kriese, L.A.Applications of an Animal Model in the United States Beef Cattle Industry.” Journal of Dairy Science 71,2(1988):3553.
Breusch, T.S., and Pagan, A.R.A Simple Test for Heteroscedasticity and Random Coefficient Variation.” Econometrica 47,5(1980):1287–94.
Chvosta, J., Rucker, R.R., and Watts, M.J.Transaction Costs and Cattle Marketing: The Information Content of Seller-Provided Presale Data at Bull Auctions.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 83,2(2001):286301.
Dhuyvetter, K.C., Schroeder, T.C., Simms, D.D., Bolze, R.P., and Geske, J.Determinants of Purebred Beef Bull Price Differentials.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 21,2(1996):396410.
Greer, H.C., and Trapp, J.N.Impact of Alternative Grid Pricing Structures on Cattle Marketing Decisions. NCR-134 Conference proceedings, 2000. Internet site: (Accessed June 28, 2007).
Halvorsen, R., and Palmquist, R.The Interpretation of Dummy Variables in Semilogarithmic Equations.” American Economic Review 70,3(1980):474–75.
Ladd, G.W., and Martin, M.B.Prices and Demands for Input Characteristics.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 58,1(1976):2130.
Miller, D.M.Reducing Transformation Bias in Curve Fitting.” The American Statistician 38,2(1984):124–26.
Quaas, R.L., and Pollak, E.J.Mixed Model Methodology for Farm and Ranch Beef Cattle Testing Programs.” Journal of Animal Science 51,6(1980):1277–87.
Rosen, S.Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure Competition.” Journal of Political Economy 82,1(1974):3455.
Schroeder, T.C., and Graff, J.L.Value of Increased Pricing Accuracy in Fed Cattle.” Review of Agricultural Economics 22,1(2000):89101.
Turner, T.K.Estimating the Economic Values Associated with EPDs for Angus Bulls at Auction.” M.S. thesis, Kansas State University, 2004.
Wallburger, A.M.Estimating the Implicit Prices of Beef Cattle Attributes: A Case from Alberta.” Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics 50,2(2002):135–49.


Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction

  • Rodney Jones (a1), Tyler Turner (a1), Kevin C. Dhuyvetter (a1) and Thomas L. Marsh (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed