Skip to main content Accessibility help

The Endowment Effect and WTA: A Quasi-Experimental Test

  • H.F. MacDonald (a1) and J.M. Bowker (a2)


This paper reports a test of the endowment effect in an economic analysis of localized air pollution. Regression techniques are used to test the significance of perceived property rights on household WTP for improved air quality versus WTA compensation to forgo an improvement in air quality. Our experiment contributes to the research into the WTP/WTA divergence by providing a new basis for supporting the existence of an endowment effect. Our results are in contrast to recent work by Shogren et al. which supports the substitution proposition of Hanemann while rejecting the endowment effect.



Hide All
Adamowicz, W.L.Valuation of Environmental Amenities.” Staff Paper 91-06. Edmonton: University of Alberta, Department of Rural Economy. 1991.
Bowker, J.M. and MacDonald, H.F.. “An Economic Analysis of Localized Air Pollution: Rendering Emissions in a Residential Setting.Canadian J. Agr. Econ. 41(1993):4559.
Brookshire, D.S., Randall, A., and Stoll, J.R.. “Valuing Increments and Decrements in Natural Resource Service Flows.Amer. J. Agr. Econ. 62(1980):478488.
Coursey, D.L., Hovis, J. and Shulze, W.D.. “The Disparity Between Willingness to Accept and Willingness to Pay Measures of Value.Qtrly. J. Econ. 102(1987):679–90.
Hanemarm, W.M.Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept: How Much Can They Differ?Amer. Econ. Rev. 81(1991):635–47.
Knetsch, J.L.The Endowment Effect and Evidence of Nonreversible Indifference Curves.Amer. Econ. Rev. 79(1989): 1277–84.
Knetsch, J.L.Environmental Policy Implications of Disparities Between Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded Measures of Values.J. Environ. Econ. and Manage. 18(1990):227–37.
Knetsch, J.L. and Sinden, J.A.. “Willingness to Pay and Compensation Demanded: Experimental Evidence of an Unexpected Disparity in Measures of Value.Qtrly. J. Econ. 99(1984):507–21.
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L, and Thaler, R.. “Experimental Tests of the Endowment Effect and the Coase Theorem.J. Polit. Econ. 98( 1990): 1325–34.
Macnab, B.J. and Adamowicz, W.L.. “Two Experiments on the Difference Between Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.” Staff Paper 90-02. Edmonton: University of Alberta, Department of Rural Economy. 1991.
Mitchell, R.C. and Carson, R.T.. Using Surveys to Value public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Washington, D.C: Resources for the Future. 1989.
Randall, A. and Stoll, J.R.. “Consumer's Surplus in Commodity Space.Amer. Econ. Rev. 66(1980):589–97.
Roberts, R.K., Douglas, P.V. and Park, W.M.. “Estimating External Costs of Municipal Landfill Siting Through Contingent Valuation Analysis: A Case Study.S.J. Agr. Econ. 23(1991): 155–65.
Shogren, J.F., Shin, S.Y., Hayes, D.J., and Kliebenstein, J.B.. “Resolving Differences in Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Accept.Amer. Econ. Rev. 84(1994):255270.
Shulze, W.D., d'Arge, R.C., and Brookshire, D.S.. “Valuing Environmental Commodities: Some Recent Experiments.Land Econ. 57( 1981): 151169.
Snedecor, G.W. and Cochran, W.G.. Statistical Methods, 7th ed. Ames, Iowa: The Iowa State University Press. 1980.
Thaler, R.Toward a Positive Theory of Consumer Choice.J. Econ. Behav. and Org. 1(1980):3960.
Willig, R.Consumer's Surplus Without Apology.” Amer. Econ. Rev. 66(1976):589–97.


The Endowment Effect and WTA: A Quasi-Experimental Test

  • H.F. MacDonald (a1) and J.M. Bowker (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed