Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-42gr6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T08:42:41.921Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficiency Measures Using the Ray-Homothetic Function: A Multiperiod Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

David L. Neff ,
Philip Garcia  and
Robert H. Hornbaker
David L. Neff
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
Philip Garcia
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Robert H. Hornbaker
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Abstract

Recent investigations have provided mixed assessments of farm firm efficiency. This analysis examined the efficiency of a homogeneous sample of central Illinois grain farms over a six-year period. A best-practice frontier was constructed using the ray-homothetic function, which allowed optimal farm output to vary with factor intensity. Efficiency measures were found to increase with temporal aggregation. The ray-homothetic approach was found to attribute high scale inefficiencies to larger sample farms in cases where the factor shares did not vary appreciably across farms. The findings suggest that policy recommendations regarding farm efficiency must be made with care.

Keywords

technical efficiencyray-homothetic functiontemporal aggregationIllinois grain farms
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 23 , Issue 2 , December 1991 , pp. 113 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aly, Hassan Y., Beibase, K., Grabowski, R. and Kraft, S.. “The Technical Efficiency of Illinois Grain Farms: An Application of a Ray-Homothetic Production Function.” So. J. Agr. Econ., 19(1987):69–78.Google Scholar
Bagi, F. S. and Huang, C.J.. “Estimating Production Technical Efficiency for Individual Farms in Tennessee.” Can. J. Agr. Econ., 31(1983):249–256.Google Scholar
Battese, G.E. and Coelli, T.J.. “Prediction of Firm-Level Technical Efficiencies with a Generalized Frontier Production Function and Panel Data.” J. Econometrics., 38(1988):387–399.Google Scholar
Bravo-Ureta, B.E. and Rieger, L.. “Alternative Production Frontier Methodologies and Dairy Farm Efficiency.” J. Agr. Econ., 41(1990):215–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrnes, P., Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Kraft, S.. ‘Technical Efficiency and Size: The Case of Illinois Grain Farms.” Euro. R Agr. Econ., 14(1987):367–381.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Osta, H.S., Pelly, R.A. and Whittaker, G.W.. “The Technical Efficiency of Corn Farms in the Corn Belt: A Methodological Note.” Paper Presented at the 1990 Joint AAEA/WAEA/CAEFMS/AERE Annual Meeting, Vancouver, B.C.Google Scholar
Elyasiani, E. and Mehdian, S.. “Efficiency in the Commercial Banking Industry, A Production Frontier Approach.” Applied Econ., 22(1990):539–551.Google Scholar
Färe, R., Grosskopf, S. and Lee, H.. “A Nonparametric Approach to Expenditure Constrained Profit Maximization.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 72(1990):574–581.Google Scholar
Färe, R., Jansson, L. and Loveli, C.A.K.. “Modelling Scale Economies with Ray-Homothetic Production Functions.” Rev. Econ. Stat., 67(1985):624–629.Google Scholar
Färe, R. and Yoon, B.J.. “Returns to Scale in U.S. Surface Mining of Coal.” Resources and Energy, 7(1985):341–352.Google Scholar
Grabowski, R. “Curve Fitting Versus Hypothesis Testing: A Comment.” Applied Econ., 22(1990):427–429.Google Scholar
Grabowski, R. and Beibase, K.. “An Analysis of Optimal Scale and Factor Intensity in Nepalese Agriculture: An Application of a Ray-Homothetic Production Function.” Applied Econ., 18(1986): 1051-1063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabowski, R. and Mehdian, S.. “Efficiency of the Railroad Industry: A Frontier Production Function Approach.” Quart. J. Bus. and Econ., 29(1990):26–42.Google Scholar
Huang, C.J. and Bagi, F.S.. “Technical Efficiency on Individual Farms in Northwest India.” So. Econ. J., 51(1984):108–115.Google Scholar
Illinois Farm Business Farm Management Association. Summary of Illinois Farm Business Records. University of Illinois Cooperative Extension Service. Various Issues, 1982–1987.Google Scholar
Kalirajan, K.P. and Flinn, J.C.. “The Measurement of Farm-Specific Technical Efficiency.” Pakistan J. Applied Econ., 2(1983): 167–180.Google Scholar
Moll, P.G. “Curve Fitting vs Hypothesis Testing with Production Functions: Comment on Grabowski and Belbase.” Applied Econ., 22(1990): 1–4.Google Scholar
Schmidt, P. and Sickles, R.C.. “Production Frontiers and Panel Data.” J. Bus. & Econ. Stat, 2(1984):367–374.Google Scholar
Seale, J.L. Jr. “Estimating Stochastic Frontier Systems with Unbalanced Panel Data: The Case of Floor Tile Manufactories in Egypt.” J. of Applied Econ., 5(1990):59–74.Google Scholar
Tauer, L.W. and Belbase, K.P.. ‘Technical Efficiency of New York Dairy Farms.” NE J. Agr. Res. Econ., 16(1987): 10–16.Google Scholar
Timmer, C.P. “Using a Probabilistic Frontier Production Function to Measure Technical Efficiency.” J. Pol. Econ., 79(1971):776–794.Google Scholar