Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2pzkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-22T05:54:45.147Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Trade Policies on Competition Between Florida and Mexico in the U.S.1 Winter Cucumber Market*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

C. O. Andrew
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Teunis DeBoon
Affiliation:
Central Soya, Portugal
W. W. McPherson
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Extract

Since the 1964 United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, less developed countries (LDCs) have been united in expressing concern over their trade problems and long-run balance of payment deficits. The LDCs feel that the more developed countries (MDCs) discriminate against their products by use of tariffs. Tariff relief sought by LDCs includes reduction of tariff rates as well as effective rates applied to raw materials and semiprocessed products.

Tariff relief for LDCs means that domestic industries in the MDSs face stronger competition from those imports that are less costly to produce in other countries, For U.S. growers of winter vegetables, this competition has become intense. Several vegetables produced in Mexico compete with Florida's in the U.S, winter market.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

1

Winter in general for this paper refers to late fall, winter, and early spring including November through mid-May.

*

University of Florida Agricultural Experiment Station Journal Series Number 5895.

References

[1] Balassa, Bela. “Tariff Protection in Industrial Countries: An Evaluation,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol. LXXIII, No. 6 (December, 1965), pp. 573594.Google Scholar
[2] Basevi, Giorgio. “The United States Tariff Structure: Estimates of Effective Rates of Production of U.S. Industries and Industrial Labor,” The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 48, No. 2 (May, 1966), pp. 147160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3] Brooke, Donald L.Cost and Returns from Vegetable Crops in Florida, Season 1970-1971 with Comparisons.” University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, 1972.Google Scholar
[4] DeBoon, Teunis. “Influence of Trade Barriers: The Florida and Mexico Experience with Winter Cucumbers.” Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Florida, 1974.Google Scholar
[5] Eastwood, Ralph A.Estimated Retail Value Whenever Sold of End Products from Primary Agricultural, Forestry and Fishery Products Produced in Florida During 1971,” Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, November 1, 1972.Google Scholar
[6] Fliginger, J. C. and Gavett, E. E., et. al. Supplying U.S. Markets with Fresh Winter Produce: Capabilities of U.S. and Mexican Production Areas. Agricultural Economics Report No. 154, U.S.D.A., Washington D.C., April 1969.Google Scholar
[7] Haley, James A.Fresh Fruits and Vegetables Market Sharing Act of 1972,” H. R. 14624. Bill introduced to the U. S. House of Representatives, 92nd Congress, 2nd Session, April 26, 1972.Google Scholar
[8] U.S.D.A., Agricultural Statistics, 1973 (production estimates).Google Scholar
[9] U.S.D.A., Foreign Agricultural Service, (import estimates).Google Scholar
[10] U.S. Tariff Commission. Tariff Schedules of the United States, TC Pub. 452, 1972.Google Scholar