Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T06:12:12.344Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Economics of Groundwater Irrigation in Nepal: Some Farm-Level Evidences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Humnath Bhandari  and
Sushil Pandey
Humnath Bhandari
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Philippines
Sushil Pandey
Affiliation:
Social Sciences Division, International Rice Research Institute, Philippines
Get access

Abstract

This article examines the economics of groundwater irrigation and shallow tubewell (STW) ownership decision making, using farm-level data collected from 324 households in Nepal. STW irrigation generated a significant positive effect on rice yield and farmers' incomes. Based on a probit model, the farm size, land fragmentation, access to electricity, and access to credit were found to significantly influence farmers' decisions to own STWs. Although the water market benefited poor farmers, it is too small and monopolistic. Policy reforms needed to make groundwater accessible to the poor majority include effective credit programs, investments in rural electrification, and public sector support for promoting suitable pumping technologies.

Keywords

groundwater irrigationprobit modelshallow tubewellC25O33
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , April 2006 , pp. 185 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, R.M. “Possibilities and Limitations to Cooperation in Small Groups: The Case of Group-Owned Wells in southern India.” World Development 28(2000): 1481-97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
APO. “Transaction Costs of Farm Credit in Asia.” APO Seminar Report. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 1996.Google Scholar
[APP] Agricultural Perspective Plan. Nepal Agriculture Perspective Plan. Kathmandu: Agriculture Project Services Center, and Washington, DC: John Mellor Associates, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
Bhandari, H. “The Economics of GW Irrigation in Rice-Based Systems in Terai of Nepal.” Ph.D. dissertation. University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines, October 1999.Google Scholar
Chun, H., and Oh, J.. “An Instrumental Variable Estimate of the Effect of Fertility on Labor Force Participation of Women.” Journal of Applied Economic Letters 9(2002):631-34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clay, E.J. “Equity and Productivity Effects of a Package of Technical Innovations and Changes in Social Institutions: Tubewells, Tractors, and HYV” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 30(1995):74–87.Google Scholar
[CMS] Consolidated Management Services. Socioeconomic Survey of Selected Agricultural/Rural Development Projects. Kathmandu: CMS Nepal (P) Ltd., 1994.Google Scholar
Dhawan, B.D. “India's Irrigation: Myths and Realities.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 53(1998): 1–14.Google Scholar
Diagne, A., and Zeller, M.. “Access to Credit and its Impact on Welfare in Malawi.” Research Report No. 116, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2001.Google Scholar
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D.. “Adoption of Agricultural Innovation in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 33(1985):255-98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foltz, J.D. “The Economics of Water-Conserving Technology Adoption in Tunisia: An Empirical Estimation of Farmer's Technology Choice.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 51(2003):359-73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gujarati, D.N.Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw-Hill, Inc., 1995.Google Scholar
Heyer, J., Stewart, E., and Thorp, R., eds. Group Behavior and Development: Is the Market Destroying Cooperation? London: Oxford University Press, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isham, J. “The Effect of Social Capital on Fertilizer Adoption: Evidence from Rural Tanzania.” Journal of African Economies 11(2002):39–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayastha, R.N. “The Nepal Country Paper.” APO Seminar Report on Water Use Efficiency in Irrigation. pp.v165–177. Tokyo: Asian Productivity Organization, 2001.Google Scholar
Khatri Chhetri, D.B. “A Study on Groundwater Markets in Nepal.” PhD dissertation, University of the Philippines Los Baños, Philippines, August 2004.Google Scholar
Koirala, G.P. “Clogs in Shallow Groundwater Use.” Research report series No. 39, Kathmandu: Winrock International, 1998.Google Scholar
Newey, W.K. “Efficient Estimation of Limited Dependent Variable Models with Endogenous Explanatory Variables.” Journal of Econometrics 36(1987):231-50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olson, M.The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: The Cambridge University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E.Crafting institutions for self-governing irrigation systems. San Francisco: Institutes for Contemporary Studies, 1992.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E., Walker, J., and Gardner, R.. Rules, Games, and Common-Pool Resources. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pant, N.New Trend in Indian Irrigation. New Delhi: Ashish Publishing House, 1992.Google Scholar
Rosegrant, M.W., Cai, X., and Cline, S.A.. World Water and Food to 2025: Dealing with Scarcity. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2002.Google Scholar
Shah, T.Groundwater Markets and Irrigation Development: Political Economy and Practical Policy. Bombay: Oxford University Press, 1993.Google Scholar
Shah, T., Molden, D., Sakthivadivel, R., and Seckler, D.. The Global Groundwater Situation: Overview of Opportunities and Challenges. Colombo, Sri Lanka: International Water Management Institute, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singh, D. “Groundwater Markets in Fragile Environments: Key Issues in Sustainability.” Indian Journal of Agricultural Economics 57(2002): 180-96.Google Scholar
Upadhyay, S.K. “Use of Groundwater Resources to Alleviate Poverty in Nepal: Policy Issues.” Groundwater Irrigation and the Rural Poor: Options for Development in the Gangetic Basin. Kahnert, F. and Levine, G., eds. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 1993.Google Scholar
[WI] Winrock International. “Irrigation Development Issues in Nepal.” Nepal Agribiref No.18, Kathmandu: WI, 1995.Google Scholar