Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-dfsvx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:16:05.270Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Economic Impacts of a Foot-And-Mouth Disease Outbreak: A Regional Analysis

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2015

Dustin L. Pendell ,
John Leatherman ,
Ted C. Schroeder  and
Gregory S. Alward
Dustin L. Pendell
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural & Resource Economics, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO
John Leatherman
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Ted C. Schroeder
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS
Get access

Abstract

Contagious animal diseases like foot-and-mouth disease (FMD) are often referred to as economic diseases because of the magnitude of economic harm they can cause to producers and to local communities. This study demonstrates the local economic impact of a FMD outbreak in southwest Kansas. The expected economic impact of the disease hinges heavily on where the incidence of the disease occurs. Disease surveillance, management strategies, mitigation investment, and overall diligence clearly need to be much greater in concentrated cattle feeding and processing areas at large feeding operations in the region.

Keywords

foot-and-mouth diseaseinvasive specieslivestockregional analysisQ11Q13R15
Type
Articles
Information
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics , Volume 39 , Issue s1 , October 2007 , pp. 19 - 33
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alward, G.S. “Deriving SAM Multiplier Models Using IMPLAN.” National IMPLAN Conference: Proceedings of the Conference. Minneapolis, Minnesota, August 15-16, 1996, pp. 7–16.Google Scholar
Berentsen, P.B., Dijkhuizen, A.A., and Oskam, A.J.. “A Dynamic Model for Cost-Benefit Analyses of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Control Strategies.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 12(1992):229-43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brester, G.W., Marsh, J.M., and Atwood, J.A.. “Distributional Impacts of Country-of-Origin Labeling in the U.S. Meat Industry.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29(2004): 206-27.Google Scholar
Caskie, P., Davis, J., and Moss, J.E.. “The Economic Impact of BSE: A Regional Perspective.” Applied Economics 31(1999):1623-30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coffey, B., Mintert, J., Fox, J., Schroeder, T., and Valentin, L.. The Economic Impact of BSE on the Us Beef Industry: Product Value Losses, Regulatory Costs, and Consumer Reactions. Kansas State University Agricultural Experiment Station and Cooperative Extension Service, MF-2678, April 2005.Google Scholar
Ekboir, J.M. “Potential Impact of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in California: The Role and Contribution of Animal Health Surveillance and Monitoring Services.” Agricultural Issues Center, University of California, Davis, 1999.Google Scholar
Garner, M.G., and Lack, M.B.. “An Evaluation of Alternate Control Strategies for Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Australia: A Regional Approach.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 23 (1995):9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A., and Reeves, A.. “North American Animal Disease Spread Model Version 3.0.X, User's Guide.” United States Department of Agriculture, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS), August 2006.Google Scholar
Holland, D., and Hughes, D.. “On the Estimation of Commodity and Trade Flows Between Rural and Urban Regions: A Three-Region Approach.” Staff Paper No. 92-4. Dept. of Agr. Econ., Washington State University, 1992.Google Scholar
Holland, D., Hughes, D., Weber, B.A., and Waters, E.C.. “Modeling the Economic Linkage between Core and Periphery Regions: The Portland, Oregon Trade Area.” Working paper, No. 92-103, Dept. of Agr. And Resour. Econ., Oregon State University, 1992.Google Scholar
Kilkenny, M. “Rural/Urban Effects of Terminating Farm Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):968-80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilkenny, M. “Operationalising a Rural-Urban General Equilibrium Model Using a Bi-regional SAM.” Social and Demographic Accounting, Hewings, G.J.D. and Madden, M., eds., pp. 164-79. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilkenny, M., and Rose, A.. “Interregional SAMs and Capital Accounts.” Social and Demographic Accounting, Hewings, G.J.D. and Madden, M., eds., pp. 41–59. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J.G., Seitzinger, A.H., and Paarlberg, P.L.. “Comparison of Economic and Disease Criteria for Controlling Foot and Mouth Disease.” Paper presented at the Western Agricultural Economics Association Meetings, Anchorage, Alaska, June 28-30, 2006.Google Scholar
Lindall, S., Olson, D., and Alward, G.. “Multi-Regional Models: The IMPLAN National Trade Flows Model.” Paper presented at the 36th Annual Meeting of the Mid-Continent Regional Science Association and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Southern Regional Science Association. Alexandria, Virginia, April 7-9, 2005.Google Scholar
Mahul, O., and Durand, B.. “Simulated Economic Consequences of Foot-and-Mouth Disease Epidemics and Their Public Control in France.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 47(2000):23–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mangen, M.-J.J., Burell, A.M., and Mourits, M.C.M.. “Epidemiological and Economic Modeling of Classical Swine Fever: Application to the 1997/1998 Dutch Epidemic.” Agricultural Systems 81(2004):37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCauley, E.H., Aulaqi, N.A., New, J.C., Sundquist, W.B., and Miller, W.M.. “Potential Economic Impact of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the United States.” Potential Economic Impact of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the United States, McCauley, E.H., Aulaqi, N.A., New, J.C., Sundquist, W.B. and Miller, W.M., eds. St. Paul, MN: University of Minnesota and APHIS-USDA, 1979.Google Scholar
MIG, Inc. IMPLAN Professional: User=s Guide, Analysis Guide, Data Guide. Stillwater, MN: Minnesota IMPLAN Group, 1999.Google Scholar
Miller, R.E. “Regional and Interregional Input-Output Analysis.” Methods of Interregional and Regional Analysis, Isard, W., Azis, I.J., Drennan, M.P., Miller, R.E., Saltzman, S. and Throbecke, E., eds. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate, 1998.Google Scholar
Miller, R.E., and Blair, P.D.. Input-Output Analysis: Foundations and Extensions. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1985.Google Scholar
North American Animal Disease Spread Model (NAADSM). Internet site: http://www.naadsm.org/ (Accessed February 2007).Google Scholar
Office International des Epizooties (OIE). Internet site: http://www.oie.int/eng/en_index.htm (Accessed December 2005).Google Scholar
Paarlberg, P.L., Lee, J.G., and Seitzinger, A.H.. “Potential Revenue Impact of an Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the United States.” Journal of American Veterinary Medical Association 220(2002):988-92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pendell, D.L. “Value of Animal Traceability Systems in Managing a Foot-and-Mouth Disease Outbreak in Southwest Kansas.” Ph.D. dissertation. Kansas State University, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, A., Gil, A.D., Zagmutt-Vergara, F., Hill, A.E., Corso, B.A., and Salman, M.D.. “Validation of the North American Animal Disease Spread Model Using Data from the 2001 Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in Uruguay.” Proceedings of the 87th Annual Meeting of the Conference of Research Workers in Animal Disease, Ellis, R.P., ed. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publishing, 2006.Google Scholar
Rich, K.M., Miller, G.Y., and Winter-Nelson, A.. “A Review of Economic Tools for the Assessment of Animal Disease Outbreaks.” Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 24(2005):833-15.Google ScholarPubMed
Schoenbaum, M.A., and Disney, W.T.. “Modeling Alternative Mitigation Strategies for a Hypothetical Outbreak of Foot-and-Mouth Disease in the United States.” Preventive Veterinary Medicine 58(2003):25–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scudamore, J.M.Origin of the UK Foot and Mouth Disease Epidemic in 2001. London: Department for Environment and Food and Rural Affairs, June 2002.Google Scholar
Thompson, D., Muriel, P., Russell, D., Osborne, P., Bromley, A., Rowland, M., Creigh-Tyte, S., and Brown, C.. “Economic Costs of the Foot and Mouth Disease Outbreak in the United Kingdom in 2001.” Revue Scientifique et Technique de l'Office International des Epizooties 21(2002): 675-87.Google ScholarPubMed
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Services (FAS). Production, Supply and Distribution. Internet site: http://www.fas.usda.gov/psd/intro.asp (Accessed July 2006).Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Services (NASS). Internet site: http://www.nass.usda.gov/index.asp (Accessed July 2006).Google Scholar
Wohlgenant, M.K. “Distribution of Gains from Research and Promotion in Multi-Stage Production Systems: The Case of the U.S. Beef and Pork Industries.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 75(1993):642-51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
107th Congress. Public Health Security and Bio-terrorism Preparedness and Response Act of 2002. Public Law 107-188. June 12, 2002.Google Scholar