Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION WITH SWINE OPERATIONS

  • CORTNEY A. COWLEY (a1), B. WADE BRORSEN (a2) and DOUGLAS W. HAMILTON (a3)

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion systems can reduce greenhouse gas emissions while turning waste products into energy. Past U.S. economic research on anaerobic digesters has studied dairy farms, but limited economic information is available on anaerobic digestion systems for swine. Net present values (NPVs) were calculated for biodigesters and covered lagoons under different coproduct and policy scenarios. With no government intervention, covered lagoons are more promising for swine operations than more capital-intensive biodigesters. As there is interest in subsidizing anaerobic digestion systems, subsidies equal to a $38/t social cost of carbon would provide positive NPVs.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION WITH SWINE OPERATIONS
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION WITH SWINE OPERATIONS
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION WITH SWINE OPERATIONS
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author's e-mail: wade.brorsen@okstate.edu

Footnotes

Hide All

Present address: Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City, Omaha, Nebraska

The views expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the positions of the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City or the Federal Reserve System. The authors would like to thank Wilbert Hundl, Jr., and Jayson Lusk for considerable assistance with the survey form. Helpful comments from Rodney Holcomb, Jody Campiche, Nathan Kauffman, and Jason Brown are gratefully acknowledged. This research received funding from the Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station and the National Institute for Agriculture Hatch project OKL0293.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Ackerman, F., and Stanton, E.A.. “Climate Risks and Carbon Prices: Revising the Social Cost of Carbon.” Economics 6,10(2012):125.
Astill, G.M., and Shumway, C.R.. “Profits from Pollutants: Economic Feasibility of Integrated Anaerobic Digester and Nutrient Management Systems.” Journal of Environmental Management 184,2(2016):353–62.
Aulenbach, B.T., Buxton, H.T., Battaglin, W.A., and Coupe, R.H.. Streamflow and Nutrient Fluxes of the Mississippi-Atchafalaya River Basin and Subbasins for the Period of Record through 2005. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2007-1080, 2007. Internet site: http://toxics.usgs.gov/pubs/of-2007-1080/ (Accessed 10 October 2012).
Beal, L.J., Burns, R.T., and Stalder, K.J.. “Effects of Anaerobic Digestion on Struvite Production for Nutrient Removal from Swine Waste Prior to Land Application.” Paper presented at the ASAE Annual International Meeting, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, July 18–21, 1999.
Bird, L.A., Holt, E., and Carroll, G.L.. “Implications of Carbon Cap-and-Trade for US Voluntary Renewable Energy Markets.” Energy Policy 36,6(2008):2063–73.
Bishop, C.P., and Shumway, C.R.. “The Economics of Dairy Anaerobic Digestion with Coproduct Marketing.” Review of Agricultural Economics 31,3(2009):394410.
Borenstein, S., Bushnell, J., Wolak, F.A., and Zaragoza-Watkins, M.. “Report of the Market Simulation Group on Competitive Supply/Demand Balance in the California Allowance Market and the Potential for Market Manipulation.” Paper presented at the public meeting of the Emissions Market Advisory Committee (EMAC), Berkeley, California, 2014.
Bridger, G.L., Salutsky, M.L., and Starostka, R.W.. “Metal Ammonium Phosphates as Fertilizers.” Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 10,3(1962):181–88.
Burns, R.T., Moody, L., and Shepherd, T.. Concentration and Extraction of Phosphorus from Swine Manure Slurries (as Struvite). Ames: Iowa State University, Animal Industry Report, AS 652 ASL R2120, 2006.
Canning, P., Charles, A., Huang, S., Polenske, K.R., and Waters, A.. Energy Use in the U.S. Food System. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report No. 94, March 2010.
Carpenter, S.R., Caraco, N.F., Correll, D.L., Howarth, R.W., Sharpley, A.N., and Smith, V.H.. “Nonpoint Pollution of Surface Waters with Phosphorus and Nitrogen.” Ecological Applications 8,3(1998):559–68.
Ҫelen, I., Buchanan, J.R., Burns, R.T., Robinson, R.B., and Raman, D.R.. “Using a Chemical Equilibrium Model to Predict Amendments Required to Precipitate Phosphorus as Struvite in Liquid Swine Manure.” Water Research 41,8(2007): 1689–96.
Centner, T.J.Regulating Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations to Enhance the Environment.” Environmental Science & Policy 6,5(2003):433–40.
Chicago Climate Exchange (CCX). “Henry Hub Natural Gas Futures, Dec 2012.” Internet site: https://web.archive.org/web/20100919011017/http://chicagoclimatex.com/market/data/summary.jsf (Accessed October 5, 2013).
Cordell, D., Drangert, J-O., and White, S.. “The Story of Phosphorus: Global Food Security and Food for Thought.” Global Environmental Change 19,2(2009):292305.
Cowley, C. “Anaerobic Digester Adoption on Animal Feeding Operations.” Ph.D. dissertation, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, 2015.
Cowley, C., and Brorsen, B.W.. “The Hurdles to Greater Adoption of Anaerobic Digesters.” Agricultural and Resource Economics Review 47,1(2018):132–57.
Dong, H., Mangino, J., McAllister, T.A., Hatfield, J.L., Johnson, D.E., Lassey, K.R., Aparecida de, M. Lima, and Romanovskaya, A.. “Chapter 10: Emissions from Livestock and Manure Management.” 2006 IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Vol. 4, Agriculture, Forestry and Other Land Use. , S., , L., , K., , T., and , K., eds. Hayama, Japan: Institute for Global Environmental Strategies (IGES) on behalf of IPCC, 2006, pp. 10.1–10.87.
Etter, B. “Process Optimization of Low-Cost Struvite Recovery.” Master's thesis, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology in Lausanne (EPFL), 2009.
European Climate Exchange (ECX). Carbon Futures, Jun 2012, 2014. Internet site: https://www.theice.com/products/197/EUA-Futures/specs (Accessed May 18, 2014).
Fleming, R.A., Babcock, B.A., and Wang, E.. “Resource or Waste? The Economics of Swine Manure Storage and Management.” Review of Agricultural Economics 20,1(1998):96113.
Gan, J., and Smith, C.T.. “Drivers for Renewable Energy: A Comparison among OECD Countries.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35,11(2011):4497–503.
Garrison, M.V., Richard, T.L., Powers-Schilling, W., and Burkart, M.. Final Report for the Iowa Livestock Industry Waste Characterization and Methane Recovery Information Dissemination Project. Des Moines, IA: Iowa Department of Natural Resources, Energy & Geological Resources Division, 2003.
Hamilton, D.W. Anaerobic Digestion of Animal Manures: Types of Digesters. Stillwater: Oklahoma State University, Oklahoma Cooperative Extension Service Fact Sheet BAE-1750, 2013.
Interagency Working Group on Social Cost of Greenhouse Gases. Technical Support Document: Technical Update of the Social Cost of Carbon for Regulatory Impact Analysis under Executive Order 12866. Washington, DC: U.S. Government, May 2013.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). IPCC Second Assessment: Climate Change 1995. IPCC, 1996. Internet site: https://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/climate-changes-1995/ipcc-2nd-assessment/2nd-assessment-en.pdf (Accessed May 20, 2014).
Kim, W., Chattopadhyay, D., and Park, J.B.. “Impact of Carbon Cost on Wholesale Electricity Price: A Note on Price Pass-Through Issues.” Energy 35,8(2010):3441–48.
Kruger, C., Chen, S., MacConnell, C., Harrison, J., Shumway, R., Zhang, T., Oakley, K., et al.High-Quality Fiber and Fertilizer as Coproducts from Anaerobic Digestion.” Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 63,1(2008):12A–13A.
Lashof, D.A., and Ahuja, D.R.. “Relative Contributions of Greenhouse Gas Emissions to Global Warming.” Nature 344(April 1990):529–31.
Lazarus, W.F., and Rudstrom, M.. “The Economics of Anaerobic Digester Operation on a Minnesota Dairy Farm.” Review of Agricultural Economics 29,2(2007):349–64.
Maaß, O., Grundmann, P., and von Bock von Polach, C.. “Added-Value from Innovative Value Chains by Establishing Nutrient Cycles via Struvite.” Resources, Conservation and Recycling 87(June 2014):126–36.
McCarl, B.A., Thayer, A.W., and Jones, J.P.H.. “The Challenge of Climate Change Adaptation for Agriculture: An Economically Oriented Review.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics. 48(November 2016):321–44.
Meinen, R.J., Kephart, K.B., and Graves, R.E.. “Economic Feasibility and Evaluation of a Novel Manure Collection and Anaerobic Digestion System at a Commercial Swine Finisher Enterprise.” Biomass and Bioenergy 63(April 2014):1021.
MidWest Plan Service (MWPS). Livestock Waste Facilities Handbook. 2nd ed. Ames: Iowa State University, 1985.
Omri, A., Daly, S., and Nguyen, D.K.. “A Robust Analysis of the Relationship between Renewable Energy Consumption and Its Main Drivers.” Applied Economics 47,28(2015):2913–23.
Pimentel, D., Hurd, L.E., Bellottie, A.C., Forster, M.J., Oka, I.N., Sholes, O.D., and Whitman, R.J.. “Food Production and the Energy Crisis.” Science 182,4111(1973):443–49.
Pimentel, D., and Pimentel, M., eds. Food, Energy, and Society. Rev. ed. Niwot: University Press of Colorado, 1996
Pimentel, D., Williamson, S., Alexander, C.E., Gonzalez-Pagan, O., Kontak, C., and Mulkey, S.E.. “Reducing Energy Inputs in the US Food System.” Human Ecology 36,4(2008): 459–71.
Ribaudo, M., Kaplan, J., Chistensen, L., Gollehon, N., Johansson, R., Breneman, V., Aillery, M., Agapoff, J., and Peters, M.. Manure Management for Water Quality: Costs to Animal Feeding Operations of Applying Manure Nutrients to Land. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Agricultural Economic Report No. 825, June 2003.
RSMeans. 2014 Building Construction Cost Data. 72nd annual ed. Norwell, MA: Reed Construction Data, 2013.
Shu, L. P., Schneider, V. Jegatheesan, and Johnson, J.. “An Economic Evaluation of Phosphorus Recovery as Struvite from Digester Supernatant.” Bioresource Technology 97,17(2006):2211–16.
Sommer, S.G., Christensen, M.L., Schmidt, T.S., and Jensen, L.S., eds. Animal Manure Recycling: Treatment and Management. Chichester, West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2013.
Stokes, J.R., Rajagopalan, R.M., and Stefanou, S.E.. “Investment in a Methane Digester: An Application of Capital Budgeting and Real Options.” Review of Agricultural Economics 30,4(2008):664–76.
Tchobanoglous, G., Stensel, H.D., Tsuchihashi, R., Burton, F., Abu-Orf, M., Bowden, G., and Pfrang, W.. Wastewater Engineering: Treatment and Resource Recovery. 5th ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2014.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers(USACE). Federal Discount Rate for Fiscal Year 2012: Economic Guidance Memorandum 12-01. Washington, DC: Department of the Army, USACE, October 2011.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service (USDA-ERS). “Average U.S. Farm Prices for Selected Fertilizers, 1960–2013.” Internet site: http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/fertilizer-use-and-price.aspx#.U5XR6_ldW2E (Accessed June 4, 2014).
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service (USDA-NASS). Overview of the United States Hog Industry. Washington, DC: USDA-NASS, 2015. Internet site: http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/usda/current/hogview/hogview-10-29-2015.pdf (Accessed September 13, 2018).
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). “Agricultural Waste Characteristics.” Part 651 Agricultural Waste Management Field Handbook. Washington, DC: USDA-NRCS, 210–VI–AWMFH, March 2008.
U.S. Department of Energy (USDOE). “Database of State Incentives for Renewables & Efficiency.” Internet site: http://www.dsireusa.org/ (Accessed 2014).
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990–2012. Washington, DC: USEPA, EPA 430-R-14-003, 2014a.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). NPDES Permit Writers’ Manual for Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations. Washington, DC: USEPA, Office of Wastewater Management, EPA 833-F-12-001, 2012.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). “AgSTAR Livestock Anaerobic Digester Database.” Washington, DC: USEPA, January 2014b. Internet site: https://www.epa.gov/agstar/livestock-anaerobic-digester-database (Accessed 2013).
Uysal, A., Yilmazel, Y.D., and Demirer, G.N.. “The Determination of Fertilizer Quality of the Formed Struvite from Effluent of a Sewage Sludge Anaerobic Digester.” Journal of Hazardous Materials 181,1–3(2010):248–54.
Wade, T., Kurkalova, L., and Secchi, S.. “Modeling Field-Level Conservation Tillage Adoption with Aggregate Choice Data.” 41,2(2016):266–85.
Wang, Q., Thompson, E., Parsons, R., Rogers, G., and Dunn, D.. “Economic Feasibility of Converting Cow Manure to Electricity: A Case Study of the CVPS Cow Power Program in Vermont.” Journal of Dairy Science 94,10(2011):4937–49.
Wilkinson, K.G.A Comparison of the Drivers Influencing Adoption of On-Farm Anaerobic Digestion in Germany and Australia.” Biomass and Bioenergy 35,5(2011):1613–22.
Yilmazel, Y.D., and Demirer, G.N.. “Removal and Recovery of Nutrients as Struvite from Anaerobic Digestion Residues of Poultry Manure.” Environmental Technology 32,7(2011):783–94.
Zaks, D.P.M., Winchester, N., Kucharik, C.J., Barford, C.C., Paltsev, S., and Reilly, J.M.. “Contribution of Anaerobic Digesters to Emissions Mitigation and Electricity Generation under U.S. Climate Policy.” Environmental Science and Technology 45,16(2011):6735–42.
Zhang, H., and Raun, B.. Oklahoma Soil Fertility Handbook. Stillwater: Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, Oklahoma State University, 2006.

Keywords

ECONOMIC FEASIBILITY OF ANAEROBIC DIGESTION WITH SWINE OPERATIONS

  • CORTNEY A. COWLEY (a1), B. WADE BRORSEN (a2) and DOUGLAS W. HAMILTON (a3)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed