Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-2lccl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:34:02.628Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Demand for Butter, Margarine, and Oils: A Nonparametric Test for Evidence of Structural Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 September 2016

Kim Jensen
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Scott Bevins
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, University of Tennessee, Knoxville
Get access

Abstract

The objective of this study was to determine whether structural change in the demand for butter, margarine, and salad and cooking oils occurred between 1967 and 1986. A nonparametric method, which does not require that a functional form be imposed on the data, was used to test for violations from stable, well-behaved preferences. Violations were found, but they were small in magnitude. Therefore, the results failed to show strong evidence that consumption patterns for butter, margarine, and oils were inconsistent with stable preferences.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Southern Agricultural Economics Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chalfant, J. A. and Alston, J. M.. “Accounting for Changes in Tastes.J. Pol. Econ., 96(1988):391410.Google Scholar
Choi, S. and Sosin, K.. ‘Testing for Structural Change in the Demand for Meat. “ Am. J. Agr. Econ., 72(1990):227236.Google Scholar
Gould, B. W., Cox, T. L., and Perali, F.. “Demand for Food Fats and Oils: The Role of Demographic Variables and Government Donations.Am. J. Agr. Econ., 73(1991): 212221.Google Scholar
Haidacher, R. C., Blaylock, J. R., and Meyers, L. H.. “Consumer Demand for Dairy Products.Washington, D. C.: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. Agr. Econ. Rep. No. 586, March 1988.Google Scholar
Heien, D. M. and Wessells, C. R.. “The Demand for Dairy Products: Structure, Prediction, and Decomposition.” Am. J. Agr. Econ., 70(1988):219228.Google Scholar
Hettinga, D. H.Why Alter Milk Composition.J. Dairy Sci., 72(1989):2790-2799.Google Scholar
Pitts, E. and Herlihy, P.. “Perverse Substitution Relationships in Demand Studies: The Example of Butter and Margarine.J. Agr. Econ., 33(1982):3746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Putnam, J. J. Food Consumption, Prices, and Expenditures, 1966-1987. Washington D. C: Stat. Bull. No. 773, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. January 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, B. J., Herrmann, R. O., and Warland, R. H.. “Milk Consumption and Consumer Concerns about Fat, Cholesterol, and Calories.” Pennsylvania State University: Dept. of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology, Agricultural Experiment Station, Market. Res. Rept. No. 8, February 1990.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Consumer Price Index, Washington, D.C., various issues, January 19671988.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Monthly Labor Review, Washington, D.C., various issues, January 19681988.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R.Non-parametric Tests of Consumer Behavior.Rev. Econ. Studies, 50(1983):99110.Google Scholar
Varian, H. R.Non-parametric Analysis of Optimizing Behavior with Measurement Error.J. Econometrics, 30(1985):445458.Google Scholar