Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Awareness of and Application to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program By Cow—Calf Producers

  • Joyce Obubuafo (a1), Jeffrey Gillespie (a1), Krishna Paudel (a1) and Seon-Ae Kim (a2)

Abstract

This study uses a bivariate probit model with partial observability to examine Louisiana beef producers' awareness of the Environmental Quality Incentives Program (EQIP) and how awareness translates to application to the program. Results indicate that awareness of and application to the EQIP depend on portion of income derived from off-farm sources, extent of previous best management practice adoption at one's own expense, household income, farmed land that is highly erodible, contact with Natural Resource Conservation Service and extension service personnel, and producer age.

Copyright

References

Hide All
Basarir, A., and Gillespie, J.M.Multidimensional Goals of Beef and Dairy Producers: An Inter-Industry Comparison.” Agricultural Economics 35(2006):103–14.
Bollen, K.A., Guilkey, D.K., and Mroz, T.A.Binary Outcomes and Endogenous Explanatory Variables: Tests and Solutions with an Application to the Demand for Contraceptive Use in Tunisia.” Demography 32,1(February 1995):111–31.
Brewer, M.J., Elworth, L.E., Landis, J.N., and Hoard, R.J.The Case and Opportunity for Public-Supported Financial Incentives to Implement Integrated Pest Management.” Journal of Economic Entomology 97,60(2004):1782–9.
Cooper, C.J., and Kiem, W.R.Incentive Payments to Encourage Farmer Adoption of Water Quality Protection Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78(1996):5464.
DeVuyst, E.A., and Ipe, V.A Group Incentive Contract to Promote Adoption of Best Management Practices.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 24,2(1999):367–82.
Dillman, D.A. Mail and Internet Surveys: The Tailored Design Method, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2000.
Dimara, E., and Skuras, D.Adoption of Agricultural Innovations as a Two-Stage Partial Observability Process.” Agricultural Economics 28,3(May 2003):187–96.
Feather, P.M., and Amacher, G.S.Role of Information in the Adoption of Best Management Practices for Water Quality Improvement.” Agricultural Economics 11(1994):159–70.
Feder, G., Just, R.E., and Zilberman, D.Adoption of Agricultural Innovations in Developing Countries: A Survey.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 33,2(1985):255–98.
Gillespie, J.M., Davis, C., Basarir, A., and Schupp, A. A Comparative Analysis of the Evolution of the Three Major U.S. Meat Industries. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana Agricultural Experiment Station, Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Bulletin No. 877, 2000.
Gillespie, Jeffrey, Kim, S.-A., and Paudel, K.Why Don’t Producers Adopt Best Management Practices? An Analysis of the Beef Cattle Industry.” Agricultural Economics 36,1(January 2007):89102.
Giulietti, M., Price, C.W., and Waterson, M.Consumer Choice and Competition Policy: A Study of UK Energy Markets.” The Economic Journal 115(October 2005):949–68.
Gould, B.W., Saupe, W.E., and Klemme, R.M.Conservation Tillage: The Role of Farm and Operator Characteristics and the Perception of Soil Erosion.” Land Economics 65,2(May 1989):167–82.
Hill, R.C., Griffiths, W.E., and Judge, G.G. Undergraduate Econometrics, 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.
Kennedy, P. A Guide to Econometrics, 3rd ed. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 1992.
Lambert, D., Sullivan, P., Claassen, R., and Foreman, L. Conservation-Compatible Practices and Programs: Who Participates. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Economic Research Report No. 14, 2006.
Lichtenberg, E.Cost Responsiveness of Conservation Practice Adoption: A Revealed Preference Approach.” Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 29,3(2004):420435.
Louisiana State University Agricultural Center. Beef Production Best Management Practices. Baton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Agricultural Center, Publication 2884, 2002.
McLean-Meyinsse, P.E., Hui, J., and Joseph, R.An Empirical Analysis of Louisiana Small Farmers’ Involvement in the Conservation Reserve Program.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 26,2(December 1994):379–85.
Meng, C.-L., and Schmidt, P.On the Cost of Partial Observability in the Bivariate Probit Model.” International Economic Review 26,1(February 1985):7185.
Onianwa, O., Dubois, M., Schelas, J., Gan, J., Wheelock, G., and Gyawali, B.An Analysis of Factors Affecting Participation Behavior of Limited Resource Farmers in Agricultural Cost-Share Programs in Alabama.” Journal of Agribusiness 22,1(2004):1729.
Rahelizatovo, N.C., and Gillespie, J.M.The Adoption of Best-Management Practices by Louisiana Dairy Producers.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics 36,1(2004):229–40.
Soule, M.J., Tegene, A., and Wiebe, K.D.Land Tenure and the Adoption of Conservation Practices.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 82,4(November 2000):9931005.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, National Agricultural Statistics Service. Agricultural Statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004.
Vigil, N., Allen, J., Creighton, B., Fuchs, H., Thomas, D., and Walker, K. Natural Resource Reporter. New Mexico Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, 2003.
Wilkening, E.A.Social Isolation and Response of Farmers to Agricultural Programs.” American Sociological Review 16,6(1951):836–7.
Wu, J., Adams, R.M., Kling, C.L., and Tanaka, K.From Microlevel Decisions to Landscape Changes: An Assessment of Agricultural Conservation Policies.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86,1(February 2004):2641.
Wu, J., and Babcock, B.A.The Choice of Tillage, Rotation, and Soil Testing Practices: Economic and Environmental Implications.” American Journal of Agricultural Economics 80(1998):494511.

Keywords

Awareness of and Application to the Environmental Quality Incentives Program By Cow—Calf Producers

  • Joyce Obubuafo (a1), Jeffrey Gillespie (a1), Krishna Paudel (a1) and Seon-Ae Kim (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed