Skip to main content Accessibility help

An Analysis of Competing Agricultural Land Uses

  • Fred C. White (a1) and Frank N. Fleming (a1)


Several alternative government programs have been used in the past to achieve policy objectives related to the levels of crop acreage and net farm income. Important questions remain relating to the effectiveness of past programs in achieving selected policy objectives. In particular, what is the relative effectiveness of long-term versus short-term acreage diversion programs? One of the major impacts of government diversion programs is in the allocation of land among competing uses. Several studies (Brandow and Learn; Christensen and Aines; Hathaway) indicate that the use of acreage control on single crops rather than on all crops results in less than proportionate reduction in output from a given reduction in acreage. However, only limited information is available on the interrelationships among major competing uses of crop, pasture, and privately owned forest acreage. Studies of these interrelationships (e.g. Dideriksen et al. and Zeimetz et al.) did not consider the influence of government programs. In particular, how do government programs affect these competing uses?



Hide All
Barlowe, Raleigh. Land Resource Economics, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc., 1978.
Branddow, G. E. and Learn, E. W.. Effects of 1954 Acreage Restrictions on Crop Production in Southeastern Pennsylvania. Pennsylvania Agr. Exp. Sta. Prog. Rep. 128, 1954.
Christensen, R. P. and Aines, R. O.. Economic Effects of Acreage Control Programs in the 1950s. USDA, ERS, Agr. Econ. Rep. 18,1962.
Dideriksen, Raymond I., Hidlebaugh, Allen R., and Schmude, Keith O.. Potential Cropland Study. USDA, SCS, Stat. Bull. 578,1977.
Georgia Crop Reporting Service. Georgia Agricultural Facts. USDA, SRS, Georgia Department of Agriculture, Athens, Georgia, 19001976.
Hathaway, D. E.The Effects of Agriculture Production Controls in 1954 on Four Michigan Farming Areas.Quart. Bull Michigan Agr. Exp. Sta. 37(1955):565–73.
McCoy, John H.Livestock and Meat Marketing. Westport, Connecticut: AVI Publishing Co., Inc., 1972.
Penn, J. B. and Irwin, George D.. “A Simultaneous Equation Approach to Production Response: Delta Region.S. J. Agr. Econ. 3(1971):115–21.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Stabilization and Conservation Service. Georgia ASCS Annual Report Athens, Georgia, 19561975.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service. State Farm Income Statistics. Suppl. to Stat. Bull. No. 557, Aug. 1976.
U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service. Georgia Conservation Needs Inventory, April 1970.
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of the Census. 1974 Cenus of Agriculture. Georgia State and County Data, Vol. 1, Part 10, July 1977.
Zeimetz, Kathryn A., Dillion, Elizabeth, Hardy, Ernest E., and Otte, Robert C.. The Dynamics of Land Use in Fast Growth Areas. USDA, ERS, Agr. Econ. Rep. 325, 1976.

An Analysis of Competing Agricultural Land Uses

  • Fred C. White (a1) and Frank N. Fleming (a1)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed