Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:54:53.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Growing up Democratic: Generational Change in East Asian Democracies*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 July 2014

RUSSELL DALTON
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine, CAUSA92697–5100rdalton@uci.edu
DOH CHULL SHIN
Affiliation:
Center for the Study of Democracy, University of California, Irvine, CAUSA92697–5100shindc@uci.edu

Abstract

Most new democracies face a challenge of reshaping the political culture to support the new democratic political order. This can often be a long-term process, complicated by the Realpolitik of governing in a new political (and often economic) system. One of the mechanisms of cultural change is generational change. New generations socialized after a democratic transition are presumably educated into the political norms of the new democratic regime. However, one can also imagine that the young lack clear political cues because they grow up under a system in transition, or even reject the new order if it is accompanied by widespread social dislocation. The study of generational change in new democracies thus provides insights into the processes transforming a nation's political culture. We analyze generational change in the new democracies of East Asia using the Second Wave of the East Asian Barometer. We examine support for a democratic/authoritarian regime and the citizenship norms that underlie a democratic process (such as the rule of law and political tolerance). Our results yield evidence of significant generational change in regime norms in these new democracies, which suggests that the political culture is gradually being transformed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this paper was presented at the conference on ‘Generations and Democracy’ at University of Cape Town, South Africa, December 17, 2012. Our thanks to Yun-han Chu, David Denemark, Robert Mattes, Richard Niemi, Robert Rohrschneider and the journal reviewers for their advice in the development of this research. We thank the Asian Barometer organization and the principal investigators of the various national surveys for access to these data. Additional information on the project is available from the project website: www.asianbarometer.org.

References

Acemoglu, D. and Robinson, J. (2005), Economic Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney (1963), The Civic Culture: Political Attitudes in Five Western Democracies, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartels, Larry (2001), A Generational Model of Political Learning, http://ebook-pdf.net/download/a-generational-model-of-political-learning.html.Google Scholar
Blondel, Jean and Inoguchi, Takashi (2006), Political Cultures in Asia and Europe: Citizens, States, and Societal Values, London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Yun-han, Diamond, Larry, Nathan, Andrew, and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.) (2008), How Asians View Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Conradt, David (1980), ‘Political Culture in Germany’, in Almond, G. and Verba, S. (eds.), The Political Culture Revisited, Boston: Little Brown.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert (1971), Polyarchy, New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.) (2006), Citizens, Democracy and Markets around the Pacific Rim, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. and Shin, Doh Chull (2014), ‘Reassessing “The Civic Culture” Model’, in Dalton, R. and Welzel, C. (eds.), The Civic Culture Transformed: From Allegiant to Assertive Citizens, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Larry (2008), The Spirits of Democracy: The Struggle to Build Free Societies Throughout the World, New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Diamond, Larry and Shin, Doh Chull (eds.) (1999), Institutional Reform and Democratic Consolidation in Korea, Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry (1966), A Theory of Stable Democracy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Flanagan, Scott and Lee, Aie-Rie (2003), ‘The New Politics, Culture Wars, and the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 36: 235–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ganbat, D., Tusalem, R., and Yang, D. (2008), ‘The Mass Public and Democratic Politics in Mongolia’, in Chu, Y., Diamond, L., Nathan, A., and Shin, D. C. (eds.), How East Asians View Democracy, New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Gerber, A. and Green, Donald (1998), ‘Rational Learning and Partisan Attitudes’, American Journal of Political Science, 42: 794818.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilley, Bruce and Diamond, Larry (eds.) (2008), Political Change in China: Comparisons with Taiwan, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald (2003), ‘How Solid is Mass Support for Democracy – and How Do We Measure It?’, PS Political Science and Politics, 36: 5157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald and Welzel, Christian (2005), Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, Hans-Dieter and Pappi, Franz (1972), Politischer Radikalismus, Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Landman, T., Larizza, M., and McEvoy, C. (2005), State of Democracy in Mongolia: A Desk Study, http://www.idea.int/democracy/upload/sodMongolia05.pdf.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan and Stepan, Alfred (1996), Problems of Democratic Transition and Consolidation: Southern Europe, South America, and Post-Communist Europe, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mannheim, Karl (1952), ‘The Problem of Generations’, in Mannheim, K., Collected Works of Karl Mannheim, Vol. V, London: Routledge.Google Scholar
McDonough, Peter, Barnes, Samuel, and Lopez-Pina, Antonio (1998), The Cultural Dynamics of Democratization in Spain, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishler, William and Rose, Richard (2007), ‘Generation, Age and Time: The Dynamics of Political Learning during Russia's Transformation’, American Journal of Political Science, 51: 822–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, Juan, Gunther, Richard, and Torcal, M. (1997), ‘Democracy in Spain: Legitimacy, Discontent and Disaffection’, Studies in Comparative International Development, 32 (3): 124–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mujani, Siaful and Liddle, R. William (2012), ‘Generational Change, Political Institutions and Regime Support in East Asia’, Asian Barometer Studies Working Paper Series, www.asianbarometer.org/newenglish/publications/.Google Scholar
Niemi, Richard and Sobieszek, B. (1997), ‘Political Socialization’, Annual Review of Sociology, 3: 209–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paolino, P. and Meernik, J. (2008), Democratization in Taiwan, New York: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian (1985), Asian Power and Politics: The Cultural Dimension of Authority, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Pye, Lucian and Verba, Sidney (1965), Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richardson, Bradley (1975), The Political Culture of Japan, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Rigger, S. (2006), Taiwan's Rising Rationalism, Washington, DC: East–West Center.Google Scholar
Rohrschneider, Robert (1999), Learning Democracy: Democratic and Economic Values in Unified Germany, Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Richard, Mishler, William, and Haerpfer, Christian (1998), Democracy and Its Alternatives, Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, Y. (2003), ‘Democratizing Indonesia’, IDEA Research Paper No. 1. (www.idea.int).Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (1999), Mass Politics and Culture in Democratizing Korea, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2008), ‘The Third Wave in East Asia’, Taiwan Journal of Democracy, 4: 91131.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull (2012), Confucianism and Democratization in East Asia, New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shin, Doh Chull and Wells, J. (2005), ‘Is Democracy the Only Game in Town?’, Journal of Democracy, 16 (2): 88101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uhlin, A. (1997), Indonesia and the ‘Third Wave of Democratization’, Richmond, UK: Curzon Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney (1965), ‘Germany: The Remaking of Political Culture’, in Pye, L. and Verba, S. (eds.), Political Culture and Political Development, Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wang, Z. and Tan, Ern-Ser (2006), ‘Self-Expression, “Asian Values”, and Democracy’, in Dalton, R. and Shin, D. C. (eds.), Democracy and Markets around the Pacific Rim, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welzel, Christian (2013), Freedom Rising: Human Empowerment and the Quest for Emancipation, New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar