Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Authoritarian deliberation revisited

  • Baogang He (a1) and Hendrik Wagenaar (a2)

Abstract

This introductory paper reviews the origin and development of the concept of authoritarian deliberation, and highlights the importance of culture and cultural tradition associated with public consultation. This paper summarizes and illustrates six key features of authoritarian deliberation in China. First, deliberation in China is a precarious balance between legal rule and state intervention. Second, the Party appeals to public reason to address and manage social conflict, and develop the soft coercion that accompanies much authoritarian deliberation. Third, this highly controlled deliberative process does, however, allow the freedom of local participants to find spaces for democratic expression, and local experiments to develop elements of deliberative democracy. Fourth, authoritarian deliberation is characterized by mutual instrumentalism. Fifth, there is an importance of an administrative and policy perspective in authoritarian deliberation. Six, the concept of authoritarian deliberation is not limited to China. There is the convergence in real-world deliberative process and outcome between authoritarian and liberal democratic systems.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Authoritarian deliberation revisited
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Authoritarian deliberation revisited
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Authoritarian deliberation revisited
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author. E-mail: baogang.he@deakin.edu.au

Footnotes

Hide All

We acknowledge the financial support of the Australian Research Council.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Alexander, JC (2006) The Civil Sphere. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Axelrod, R and Cohen, MD (2001) Harnessing Complexity. Organizational Implications of a Scientific Frontier. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Bächtiger, A, Niemeyer, S, Neblo, M, Steenbergen, MR and Steiner, J (2010) Symposium: toward more realistic models of deliberative democracy disentangling diversity in deliberative democracy: competing theories, their blind spots and complementarities. The Journal of Political Philosophy 18, 3263.
Brown, W (2017) Undoing the Demos. Neoliberalism's Stealth Revolution. New York, NY: Zone Books.
Charmaz, K (2006) Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. London: SAGE.
Cohen, J (1989) Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Hamlin, A and Pettit, P (ed.), The Good Polity. New York: Blackwell, pp. 1734.
Dryzek, JS (1990) Discursive Democracy. Politics, Policy, and Political Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fishkin, J (2018) Democracy When the People Are Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Fishkin, J, He, B, Luskin, R and Siu, A (2010) Deliberative democracy in an unlikely place: deliberative polling in China. British Journal of Political Science 40, 435448.
Habermas, J (1984) The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Translated by McCarthy, Thomas, Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
He, B (1996) The Democratization of China. London: Routledge.
He, B (2006) Western theories of deliberative democracy and the Chinese practice of complex deliberative governance. In Leib, E and He, B), The Search for Deliberative Democracy in China. New York: Palgrave, pp. 133148.
He, B (2014) Deliberative culture and politics: the persistence of authoritarian deliberation in China. Political Theory 42, 5881.
He, B (2018) Deliberative Citizenship and Deliberative Governance: a case study of one deliberative experimental in China. Citizenship Studies 22, 294311.
He, B and Warren, M (2011) Authoritarian deliberation: the deliberative turn in Chinese political development. Perspectives on Politics 9, 269289.
He, B and Warren, M (2017) Authoritarian deliberation in China. Daedalus 146, 155166.
Keane, J (2017) When Trees Fall, Monkeys Scatter: Rethinking Democracy In China. London: World Scientific Europe Ltd.
Lindblom, CE (1959) The science of muddling through. Public Administration Review 19, 7988.
Niu, P and Wagenaar, H (2018) The limits of authoritarian rule: policy making and deliberation in urban village regeneration in China. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 678693.
O'Flynn, I and Curato, N (2015) Deliberative democratization: a framework for systemic analysis. Policy Studies 36, 298313.
Parkinson, J and Mansbridge, J (eds.) (2012) Deliberative Systems. Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Qin, X and He, B (2018) Deliberation, demobilization, and limited empowerment: a survey study on participatory pricing in China. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 694708.
Rodan, G (2018) Participation Without Democracy: Containing Conflict in Southeast Asia. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Romano, GC (2018) A critical reappraisal residents’ participation in China and France: “authoritarian deliberation” goes global?. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 709722.
Tang, B (2018) Deliberation and governance in Chinese middle-class neighborhoods. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 663677.
Tong, D and He, B (2018) How democratic are Chinese grassroots deliberations? An empirical study of 393 deliberation experiments in China. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 630642.
van Eijck, G (2018) Populisme in de praktijk. De effecvitiviteit van Inspraak. De Groene Amsterdammer 142, 2427.
Wagenaar, H (2007) Governance, complexity and democratic participation: how citizens and public officials harness the complexities of neighbourhood decline. American Review of Public Administration 37, 1750.
Weaver, RK (1986) The politics of blame avoidance. Journal of Public Policy 6, 371398.
Weber, R and Froehlich, T (2016) Are there elements of deliberative democracy in China? comments on the discussion of the Zeguo experiment. Politische Viertel Jahresschrift 5, 550.
Wildavksy, A (1979) Speaking Truth to Power. The Art and Craft of Policy Analysis. Boston, MA: Little Brown and Company.
Zhang, K and Meng, T (2018) The roles of political elites in deliberative democracy: beliefs and behaviors of Chinese local Officials. Japanese Journal of Political Science 19, 643662.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed