Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-nbrzn Total loading time: 0.317 Render date: 2021-04-15T15:37:11.416Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

From KISS to TASS Modeling: A Preliminary Analysis of the Segregation Model Incorporated with Spatial Data on Chicago

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 October 2015

GAKU ITO
Affiliation:
Department of Advanced Social and International Studies, the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, the University of Tokyogakuatgu@gmail.com
SUSUMU YAMAKAGE
Affiliation:
Professor of International Relations, Aoyama Gakuin University, Tokyoyamakage@sipeb.aoyama.ac.jp
Corresponding

Abstract

The ‘keep it simple, stupid’ slogan, or the KISS principle has been the basic guideline in agent-based modeling (ABM). While the KISS principle or parsimony is vital in modeling attempts, conventional agent-based models remain abstract and are rarely incorporated or validated with empirical data, leaving the links between theoretical models and empirical phenomena rather loose. This article reexamines the KISS principle and discusses the recent modeling attempts that incorporate and validate agent-based models with spatial (geo-referenced) data, moving beyond the KISS principle. This article also provides a working example of such time and space specified (TASS) agent-based models that incorporates Schelling's (1971) classic model of residential segregation with detailed geo-referenced demographic data on the city of Chicago derived from the US Census 2010.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Almquist, Zack W. (2010), ‘US Census Spatial and Demographic Data in R: The US Census 2000 Suite of packages’, Journal of Statistical Software, 37 (6): 131.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1984), The Evolution of Cooperation, New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1997a), The Complexity of Cooperation: Agent-Based Models of Competition and Col-Laboration, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert (1997b), ‘The Dissemination of Culture: A Model with Local Convergence and Global Polarization’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 41 (2): 203–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benenson, Itzhak, Omer, Itzhak, and Hatna, Erez (2002), ‘Entity-Based Modeling of Urban Residential Dynamics: The Case of Yaffo, Tel Aviv’, Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29 (4): 491512.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benenson, Itzhak, Hatna, Erez, and Or, Ehud (2009), ‘From Schelling to Spatially Explicit Modeling of Urban Ethnic and Economic Residential Dynamics’, Sociological Methods and Research, 37 (4): 463–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Ravi and Choi, Hyun J. (2012), ‘Modeling Civil Violence in Afghanistan: Ethnic Geography, Control, and Collaboration’, Complexity, 17 (6): 4251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Ravi, Findley, Michael G., and Kuklinski, James H. (2009), ‘Rumor Dynamics in Ethnic Violence’, Journal of Politics, 71 (3): 876–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Ravi, Miodownik, Dan, and Choi, Hyun Jin (2011), ‘Three Two Tango: Territorial Control and Selective Violence in Israel, the West Bank, and Gaza’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 55 (1): 133–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhavnani, Ravi, Donnay, Karsten, Miodownik, Dan, Mor, Maayan, and Helbing, Dirk (2014), ‘Group Segregation and Urban Violence’, American Journal of Political Science, 58 (1): 226–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bivand, Roger S., Pebesma, Edzer, and Gómez-Rubio, Virgilio (2013), Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R, New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bremer, Stuart A. and Mihalka, Michael (1977), ‘Machiavelli in Machina: Or Politics among Hexagons’, in Deutsch, Karl W., Fritsch, Bruno, Jaguaribe, Helio, and Markovits, Andrei S. (eds.), Problems of World Modeling: Political and Social Implications, Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Bruch, Elizabeth E. (2014), ‘How Population Structure Shapes Neighborhood Segregation’, American Journal of Sociology, 119 (5): 1221–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruch, Elizabeth E. and Mare, Robert D. (2006), ‘Neighborhood Choice and Neighborhood Change’, American Journal of Sociology, 112 (3): 667709.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castellano, Claudio, Fortunato, Santo, and Loreto, Vittorio (2009), ‘Statistical Physics of Social Dynamics’, Reviews of Modern Physics, 81 (2): 591646.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik (1997), Emergent Actors in World Politics: How States and Nations Develop and Dissolve, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Cederman, Lars-Erik (2002), ‘Endogenizing Geopolitical Boundaries with Agent-Based Modeling’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 99 (3): 7296–303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cederman, Lars-Erik (2005), ‘Computational Models of Social Forms: Advancing Generative Process Theory’, American Journal of Sociology, 110 (4): 864–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Charles, Camille Zubrinsky (2003), ‘The Dynamics of Racial Residential Segregation’, Annual Review of Sociology, 29 (1): 167207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, William A. V. (1991), ‘Residential Preferences and Neighborhood Racial Segregation: A Test of the Schelling Segregation Model’, Demography, 28 (1): 119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clark, William A. V. and Fossett, Mark (2008), ‘Understanding the Social Context of the Schelling Segregation Model’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105 (11): 4109–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coleman, James (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crooks, Andrew T. (2008), ‘Constructing and Implementing an Agent-Based Model of Residential Segregation through Vector GIS’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 24 (5): 661–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crooks, Andrew T., Castle, Christian, and Batty, Michael (2008), ‘Key Challenges in Agent-Based Modelling for Geo-Spatial Simulation’, Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 32 (6): 417–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, Thomus R. and Stoll, Richard J. (1990), Exploring Realpolitik: Probing International Relations Theory with Computer Simulation, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Emerson, Michael O., Yancey, George, and Chai, Karen J. (2001), ‘Does Race Matter in Residential Segregation? Exploring the Preferences of White Americans’, American Sociological Review, 66 (6): 922–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, Joshua and Axtell, Robert (1996), Growing Artificial Societies: Social Science from the Bottom Up, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Farley, Reynolds, Schuman, Howard, Bianchi, Suzanne, Colasanto, Diane, and Hatchett, Shirley (1978), ‘“Chocolate City, Vanilla Suburbs”: Will the Trend Toward Racially Separate Communities Continue?’, Social Science Research, 7 (4): 319–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fossett, Mark and Waren, Warren (2005), ‘Overlooked Implications of Ethnic Preferences for Residential Segregation in Agent-Based Models’, Urban Studies, 42 (11): 1893–917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatna, Erez and Benenson, Itzhak (2014), ‘Combining Segregation and Integration: Schelling Model Dynamics for Heterogeneous Population’, http://arxiv.org/abs/1406.5215.Google Scholar
Helbing, Dirk, Brockmann, Dirk, Chadefaux, Thomas, Donnay, Karsten, Woolley-Meza, Olivia, Moussaid, Mehdi, Johansson, Anders, Krause, Jens, Schutte, Sebastian, and Perc, Matjaž (2015), ‘Saving Human Lives: What Complexity Science and Information Systems Can Contribute’, Journal of Statistical Physics, 158 (3): 735–81.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janssen, Marco A. and Ostrom, Elinor (2006), ‘Empirically Based, Agent-Based Models’, Ecology and Society, 11 (2): article 37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Dominic D. P., Weidmann, Nils B., and Cederman, Lars-Erik (2011), ‘Fortune Favours the Bold: An Agent-Based Model Reveals Adaptive Advantages of Overconfidence in War’, PLoS ONE, 6 (6)e20851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krysan, Maria, Couper, Mick P., Farley, Reynolds, and Forman, Tyrone A. (2009), ‘Does Race Matter in Neighborhood Preferences? Results from a Video Experiment’, American Journal of Sociology, 115 (2): 527–59.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laurie, Alexander J. and Jaggi, Narendra K. (2003), ‘Role of “Vision” in Neighbourhood Racial Segregation: A Variant of the Schelling Segregation Model’, Urban Studies, 40 (13): 2687–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laver, Michael and Sergenti, Ernst (2012), Party Competition: An Agent-Based Model, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Lim, May, Metzler, Richard, and Bar-Yam, Yaneer (2007), ‘Global Pattern Formation and Ethnic/Cultural Violence’, Science, 317 (5844): 1540–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Logan, John R., Stults, Brian, Board, Advisory, Anderson, Margo, Bianchi, Suzanne, Bluestone, Barry, Danziger, Sheldon, Fischer, Claude, Lichter, Daniel, and Prewitt, Kenneth (2011), ‘The Persistence of Segregation in the Metropolis: New Findings from the 2010 Census’, Census Brief prepared for Project US2010, http://www.s4.brown.edu/us2010 (accessed 19 August 2014).Google Scholar
Lustick, Ian S., Miodownik, Dan, and Eidelson, Roy J. (2004), ‘Secessionism in Multicultural States: Does Sharing Power Prevent or Encourage It?’, American Political Science Review, 98 (2): 209–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lustick, Ian S. and Miodownik, Dan (2009), ‘Abstractions, Ensembles, and Virtualizations: Simplicity and Complexity in Agent-Based Modeling’, Comparative Politics, 41 (2): 223–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macy, Michael W. and Willer, Robert (2002), ‘From Factors to Actors: Computational Sociology and Agent-Based Modeling’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28 (1): 143–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCoy, Barry M. and Wu, Tai Tsun (2014), The Two-Dimensional Ising Model, second edition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mitsutsuji, Katsuma and Yamakage, Susumu (2013), ‘Bringing Empirical Analysis in International Politics and Multi-Agent Simulation: Substitutiong Basic Norms in International Society’, Working Paprer Series: Study on Artificial Societies, No. 43, University of Tokyo.Google Scholar
O'Sullivan, David O. (2008), ‘Geographical Information Science: Agent-Based Models’, Progress in Human Geography, 32 (4): 541–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakamoto, Takuto (2013), ‘Conflict Analysis in Virtual States (CAVS): A New Experimental Method Based on the Extensive Use of Multi-Agent Simulation (MAS) and Geographical Information System (GIS)’, JICA Research Institute Working Paper, 56 (3).Google Scholar
Sakoda, James M. (1971), ‘The Checkerboard Model of Social Interaction’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1 (1): 119–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1969), ‘Models of Segregation’, American Economic Review, 59 (2): 488–93.Google Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1971), ‘Dynamic Models of Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 1 (2): 143–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. (1978), Micromotives and Macrobehavior, New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. (1981), ‘Conflict as a Determinant of Territory’, Behavioral Science, 26 (1): 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, David A. (2009), ‘Social Networks and Collective Action’, American Journal of Political Science, 53 (1): 122–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegel, David A. (2011), ‘When Does Repression Work? Collective Action in Social Networks’, Journal of Politics, 73 (4): 9931010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrens, Paul M. and Benenson, Itzhak (2005), ‘Geographic Automata Systems’, International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (4): 385412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vinkovic, Dejan and Kirman, Alan (2006), ‘A Physical Analogue of the Schelling Model’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103 (51): 19261–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weidmann, Nils B. and Salehyan, Idean (2013), ‘Violence and Ethnic Segregation: A Computational Model Applied to Baghdad’, International Studies Quarterly, 57 (1): 5264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xie, Yu and Zhou, Xiang (2012), ‘Modeling Individual-Level Heterogeneity in Racial Residential Segregation’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109 (29): 11646–51.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Li (2009), ‘The Dynamics of Residential Segregation in Buffalo: An Agent-Based Simulation’, Urban Studies, 46 (13): 2749–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, Junfu (2004), ‘A Dynamic Model of Residential Segregation’, Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 28 (3): 147–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 12
Total number of PDF views: 121 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 15th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

From KISS to TASS Modeling: A Preliminary Analysis of the Segregation Model Incorporated with Spatial Data on Chicago
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

From KISS to TASS Modeling: A Preliminary Analysis of the Segregation Model Incorporated with Spatial Data on Chicago
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

From KISS to TASS Modeling: A Preliminary Analysis of the Segregation Model Incorporated with Spatial Data on Chicago
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *