Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c47g7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-16T03:31:22.885Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Use of seclusion in a general hospital acute psychiatric unit

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 June 2014

Bernice Prinsloo*
Affiliation:
Lucena Clinic, Tallaght, Dublin 24
Angela Noonan
Affiliation:
St Vincent's Hospital, Fairview, Dublin 3, Ireland
*
*Correspondence E-mail: bernice.prinsloo@yahoo.com

Abstract

Objective: To examine the frequency of use of seclusion and the factors associated with its use in Lakeview Unit, a 29-bedded acute psychiatric unit in Naas General Hospital.

Methods: A survey was carried out involving a retrospective chart review of all patients secluded over a 12-month period, as well as a review of the seclusion register for this period. Secluded and non-secluded patients were compared for gender, nationality, age, diagnosis, duration of admission and admission status by reviewing discharge summaries of all patients admitted during the 12-month period.

Results: Most (75%) of the secluded patients were secluded only once. Half of seclusion events were initiated in the first week of admission. Length of time spent in seclusion ranged from 50 minutes to 96 hours, with a mean duration of 25 hours 20 minutes. Seclusion was most often associated with risk to others and risk to self. Alternatives to seclusion considered included verbal de-escalation, medication, special nursing, single room accommodation and time out Male and non-Irish patients were more likely to be secluded. There was no significant difference between secluded and non-secluded patients in terms of age. Patients with psychotic disorders tended to be secluded more frequently than others, followed by patients with bipolar affective disorder and substance use disorders. Longer duration of admission and involuntary admission status were strongly associated with seclusion.

Conclusion: Seclusion remains an important part of psychiatric practice on Lakeview Unit, and reflects indirect measures of illness severity. In order to reduce the duration of seclusion episodes, the development of alternative containment strategies needs to be addressed. Seclusion audits should be carried out regularly to ensure that best practice is adhered to.

Type
Original Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lendemeijer, B, Shortridge-Baggett, L.The Use of Seclusion in Psychiatry: A Literature Review. Scholarly Inquiry for Nursing Practice: An International Journal 1997; 11: 299315.Google ScholarPubMed
2. Tunde-Ayinmode, M, Little, J.Use of seclusion in a psychiatric acute inpatient unit. Australasian Psychiatry 2004; 12: 347351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Rules Governing the Use of Seclusion & Mechanical means of Bodily Restraint. Mental Health Commission Rules 2006; R-S69(2)/02/2006: 129.Google Scholar
4. Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2008: 160,164.Google Scholar
5. Mental Health Commission Annual Report 2007: 7078.Google Scholar
6. Prinsen, EJD, van Delden, JJM.Can we justify eliminating coercive measures in psychiatry? Journal of Medical Ethics 2009; 12: 6973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. El-Badri, SM, Mellsop, G.A study of the use of seclusion in an acute psychiatric service. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 2002; 36: 399403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Gaskin, CJ, Elsom, SJ, Happell, B.Interventions for reducing the use of seclusion in psychiatric facilities. British Journal of Psychiatry 2007; 191: 298303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. A Vision for Change: Report of the Expert Group on Mental Health Policy 2006; 1288.Google Scholar
10. CR41 Strategies for the Management of Disturbed and Violent Patients in Psychiatric Units. Royal College of Psychiatrists 1996.Google Scholar