Skip to main content Accessibility help

A rose by any other name: psychiatric outpatients' views on dress and address

  • Geraldine Swift (a1), Mazly Zachariah and Patricia R Casey (a2)


Objectives: The manner in which psychiatrists dress and how they address their patients and in turn are addressed, may impact upon the therapeutic relationship. We undertook a survey to assess patients' preferences regarding doctors' dress and forms of address.

Method: Patients attending four psychiatric clinics were asked to complete a questionnaire asking them to rate photographs of doctors dressed in varying levels of formality, presented in random order.

Results: One hundred and forty-five patients agreed to take part. Patients had a strong preference for their consultants to wear suits but were more ambivalent about NCHDs' attire. When asked to rate the photographs in terms of competence and ease in forming a trusting relationship, suits scored the highest ratings. When asked to rate for friendliness, smart attire scored slightly higher than suits. Of the patients 50% said that they wished to be called by their first name and 50% said that they did not have a preference. Very few patients preferred to be addressed by title but 95% said that they tended to call their doctor by title. Of the respondents 70% preferred to be called patients rather than clients or service users.

Conclusions: The patients in this survey preferred their doctors to dress formally and were comfortable with an asymmetrical form of address.



Hide All
1.Gjerdingen, DK, Simpson, DE, Tims, SL. Patients' and physicians' attitudes regarding the physician's professional appearance. Arch Intern Med 1987; 147: 1209–12.
2.Bannerjee, AK. Does a doctor's dress-style really matter? Med J Aust 1988; 149: 168.
3.Finlay, F, Jones, R. Doctors' dress. Br J Psychiatry 1997: 171: 188.
4.Barrett, TG. Booth, IW. Sartorial eloquence: does it exist in the paediatrician-patient relationship? BMJ 1994; 309: 1710–2.
5.McKinstry, B, Wing, J. Putting on the style: what patients think of the way their doctor dress. Br J Gen Practice 1991; 41: 275–8.
6.Goslin, R, Standen, P. Doctors' dress. Br J Psychiatry 1997: 171; 188.
7.Dunn, JJ, Lee, TH. Percelay, JM, Fitz, JG, Goldman, L. Patient and house officer attitudes on physician attire and etiquette. JAMA 1987; 257: 65–8.
8.Gledhill, JA, Warner, JP, King, M. Br J Psychiatry 1997; 171: 228–32.
9.Rnjagopalan, M, Santilli, M, Powell, D, Murphy, M, O'Brien, M, Murphy, J. Mental health professionals' attire. Aust NZ J Psych 1998; 32: 880–3.
10.Tham, SW, Ford, TJ. Staff dress on acute psychiatric wards. J Mental Health 1995; 4: 297–9.
11.King, LS. ‘Hey You’ and other forms of address. JAMA 1985; 254: 266–7.
12.Bradshaw, SL, Twemlow, S. Use of first and last names and milieu characteristics. Psych Hosp 1987; 18: 90–4.


A rose by any other name: psychiatric outpatients' views on dress and address

  • Geraldine Swift (a1), Mazly Zachariah and Patricia R Casey (a2)


Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed