Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Opinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001

  • I. Georgieva (a1), E. Bainbridge (a1) (a2), D. McGuinness (a2) (a3), M. Keys (a4), L. Brosnan (a3), H. Felzmann (a5), J. Maguire (a6), K. Murphy (a7), A. Higgins (a8), C. McDonald (a1) (a2) and B. Hallahan (a1) (a2)...

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate and compare the opinions of key stakeholders involved in the involuntary admission and treatment of patients under the Mental Health Act (MHA) 2001 regarding their views towards the operation of the legislation.

Methods

We employed a descriptive survey design. A questionnaire was distributed to stakeholders involved in the operation of the MHA 2001 (except service users, whose views were explored in a separate qualitative study) via paper or online versions evaluating their opinions regarding the operation of the MHA 2001 in relation to assessment, care, rights, transfer and information available.

Results

Stakeholders agreed that in their opinion that patients generally benefit from the care they receive (79%) and that the MHA 2001 ensures an independent and fair review of the person’s detention (65%). However, only 23% of stakeholders were satisfied with the process of transferring patients to hospital and with the clinical assessment procedures therein (37%), with the greatest levels of dissatisfaction amongst Gardai (Police), general practitioners (GPs) and family members.

Conclusions

While the introduction of the MHA 2001 has assisted delivery of care to patients with improved adherence to international human rights frameworks applicable at the time of its enactment, substantial dissatisfaction with the implementation of the MHA 2001 in practice is experienced by stakeholders particularly at the distressing phase of clinical assessment and transfer to hospital.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Opinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Opinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Opinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Address for correspondence: Dr B. Hallahan, School of Medicine, Clinical Science Institute, National University of Ireland Galway, Galway, Ireland (Email: brian.hallahan@nuigalway.ie)

References

Hide All
Beasley, TM, Schumacker, RE (1995). Multiple regression approach to analyzing contingency tables: post hoc and planned comparison procedures. The Journal of Experimental Education 64, 7993.
Department of Health (2015). Report of the expert group on the review of the Mental Health Act 2001 (http://health.gov.ie/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/Dept-Health-Report-Expert-Group-for-website.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Doherty, AM, Jabbar, F, Kelly, BD (2014). Attitudes and experiences of nursing staff to the Mental Health Act 2001: lessons for future mental health legislation. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 31, 8387.
Fiorillo, A, De Rosa, C, Del Vecchio, V, Jurjanz, L, Schnall, K, Onchev, G, et al. (2011). How to improve clinical practice on involuntary hospital admissions of psychiatric patients: suggestions from the EUNOMIA study. European Psychiatry 26, 201207.
Jabbar, F, Doherty, AM, Aziz, M, Kelly, BD (2011). Implementing the Mental Health Act 2007 in British general practice: lessons from Ireland. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34, 414418.
Jabbar, F, Kelly, BD, Casey, P (2010). National survey of psychiatrists’ responses to implementation of the Mental Health Act 2001 in Ireland. Irish Journal of Medical Science 179, 291294.
Jankovic, J, Yeeles, K, Karsakou, C, Amos, T, Morriss, R, Rose, D, Nichol, P, McCabe, R, Prebe, S (2011). Family caregivers’ experiences of involuntary psychiatric hospital admissions of their relatives–a qualitative study. PLoS One 6, e25425.
Jones, IR, Ahmed, N, Cathy, J, McLaren, S, Rose, D, Wykes, T, Burns, T, Echo Group (2009). Illness careers and continuity of care in mental health services. A qualitative study of service users and carers. Social Science and Medicine 69, 632639.
Kelly, BD (2011). Mental health legislation and human rights in England, Wales and the Republic of Ireland. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 34, 439454.
Kelly, M, O’Sulliva, K, Finnegan, P, Moran, J, Bradley, C ( 2011). Assisted admissions? A national survey of general practitioner experience of involuntary admissions. Irish Medical Journal 104, 273275.
McCullagh, P (1980). Regression models for ordinal data. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological) 42, 109142.
Mental Health Commision (2007). Annual Report 2011 (http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/mhc_ar2006.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Mental Health Commission (2008). Annual report 2011 (http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/mhc_ar2007.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Mental Health Commission (2009). Annual report 2011 (http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/mhc_ar2008.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Mental Health Commission (2010). Annual report 2011 (http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/mhc_ar2009.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Mental Health Commission (2014). Annual report 2011 (http://www.mhcirl.ie/File/mhc_ar2013.pdf). Accessed 5 January 2015.
Murray, I, Hallahan, B., McDonald, C (2009). Has the Mental Health Act 2001 altered the clinical profile of involuntary admissions? Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 26, 179182.
O’Donoghue, B, Lyne, J, Hill, M, Larkin, C, Feeney, L, O’Callaghan, E (2009). Involuntary admission from the patients’ perspective. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology 45, 631638.
O’Donoghue B, Lyne J, Hill M, O'Rourke L, Daly S, Feeney L (2010). Attitudes towards compulsory community treatment orders and advance directives among patients previously admitted involuntarily under the Mental Health Act 2001. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 27, 66–71.
O’Donoghue, B, Lyne, J, Hill, M, O’Rourke, L, Daly, S, Larkin, C, Feeney, L, O’Callaghan, E (2011). Perceptions of involuntary admission and risk of subsequent readmission at one-year follow-up: the influence of insight and recovery style. Journal of Mental Health 20, 249259.
O’Donoghue, B, Moran, P (2009). Consultant psychiatrists’ experiences and attitudes following the introduction of the Mental Health Act 2001: a national survey. Irish Journal of Psychological Medicine 26, 2326.
Ramsey, H, Roche, E, O’Donoghue, B (2013). Five years after implementation: a review of the Irish Mental Health Act 2001. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 36, 8391.
van den Hooff, S, Leget, C, Goossensen, A (2015). Healthcare professionals under pressure in involuntary admission processes. Nursing Philosophy 16, 177186.

Keywords

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Georgieva supplementary material S1
etable

 Word (15 KB)
15 KB

Opinions of key stakeholders concerning involuntary admission of patients under the Mental Health Act 2001

  • I. Georgieva (a1), E. Bainbridge (a1) (a2), D. McGuinness (a2) (a3), M. Keys (a4), L. Brosnan (a3), H. Felzmann (a5), J. Maguire (a6), K. Murphy (a7), A. Higgins (a8), C. McDonald (a1) (a2) and B. Hallahan (a1) (a2)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.