Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T23:10:44.276Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The “Land of Amurru” and the “Lands of Amurru” in the Šaušgamuwa Treaty

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

Extract

The original meaning and the changes in the content of the term Amurru in the course of the second millennium B.C. have been one of the most intensively discussed and debated subjects of Near Eastern history. The name appears from the late third millennium on, both in phonetic spelling and in the logographic writing MAR.TU. It is now generally agreed that in the early part of the second millennium the term refers loosely to the Syrian regions situated west of Mesopotamia proper and to the inhabitants of these regions. The more difficult questions under debate are concerned with the original meaning of Amurru, whether ethnic or geographical, and with the exact nature and origin of its equation with MAR.TU. These important questions however are of little concern for the issue discussed in this paper.

The broad sense of Amurru as indicated above, often used in opposition to Akkad, is gradually restricted to a more limited region of central and southern Syria. A Mari text has the “Land of Amurru” in a sequence after the lands of Yamhad and Qatna, whereas another text mentions “the messengers of four kings of Amurru” alongside the messengers of Hazor. Texts from Alalakh VII and IV mention individuals from the “Land of MAR.TU”, without however any clues to its whereabouts.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Buccellati, G. 1990. From Khana to Laqê: The end of Syro-Mesopotamia. In: Tunca, Ö. (ed.), De la Babylonie à la Syrie en passant par Mari (Mélanges J.-R. Kupper), Liège: 229–53.Google Scholar
CTH = Laroche, E., Catalogue des textes Hittites. Paris 1971.Google Scholar
Dhorme, E. 1951. Recueil Edouard Dhorme. Paris.Google Scholar
EA = El Amarna Tablets.Google Scholar
Edel, E. 1950. KBo I 15+19, ein Brief Ramses II. mit einer Schilderung der Kadešschlacht. ZA 49: 195212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrer, E. 1932. Assyrien. RIA I: 228–97.Google Scholar
Groneberg, B. 1980. Die Orts- und Gewässernamen der altbabylonischen Zeit (RGTC 3). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Helck, W. 1971. Die Beziehungen Ägyptens zu Vorderasien im 3. und 2. Jahrtausend v. Chr. (2 Aufl.). Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
KBo = Keilschrifttexte aus Boghazköi.Google Scholar
Kestemont, G. 1978. La société internationale mitanienne et le royaume d'Amurru à l'époque amarnienne. OLP 9: 2732.Google Scholar
Kitchen, K. 1962. Suppiluliuma and the Amarna Pharaohs. Liverpool.Google Scholar
Klengel, H. 1964. Neue Fragmente zur akkadischen Fassung des Aziru-Vertrages. OLZ 59: 437–45.Google Scholar
Klengel, H. 1969. Geschichte Syriens im 2. Jahrtausend v.u.Z. II. Berlin.Google Scholar
KUB = Keilschrifturkunden aus Boghazköy.Google Scholar
Kühne, H.-H. Otten. 1971. Der Šaušgamuwa-Verlrag. Wiesbaden.Google Scholar
Kupper, J.-R. 1957. Les nomades en Mésopotamie au temps des rois de Mari. Paris.Google Scholar
Liverani, M. 1973. The Amorites. In Wiseman, D. J., Peoples of Old Testament Times. London.Google Scholar
Moran, W. L. 1987. Les lettres d'El Amarna. Paris.Google Scholar
Murnane, W. J. 1985. The Road to Kadesh. Chicago.Google Scholar
Singer, I. 1985. The Battle of Nihriya and the End of the Hittite Empire. ZA 75: 100–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singer, I. 1990. Aziru's Apostasy and the Historical Setting of the General's Letter. In: Izre'el, S. and Singer, I., The General's Letter from Ugarit: A Linguistic and Historical Reevaluation of RS 20.33 (Ugaritica V, No. 20). Tel Aviv: 112–83.Google Scholar
Starcky, J. 1982. La flèche de Zakarba'al roi d'Amurru. In: Archéologie au Levant, Recueil R. Saidah. Lyon: 179–86.Google Scholar
Sturm, J. 1933. Wer ist Piphururiaš? RHA 2:13: 161–76.Google Scholar
Vincentelli, I. 1972. Prodotti “Amorrei” e prodotti “Hurriti”. OrAnt 11: 133–5.Google Scholar
Waterhouse, S. 1965. Syria in the Amarna Age: A Borderland between Conflicting Empires, Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. 1958. Die Feldzüge und Bauten Tiglatpilesers I. AfO 18: 342–60.Google Scholar
Weidner, E. F. 19591960. Der Kanzler Salmanassars I. AfO 19: 33–9.Google Scholar