Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-xtgtn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T06:25:27.559Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Bulgarmaden: Thoughts about iron, Bolkardağ and the Taurus mountains

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 August 2014

K. Aslihan Yener
K. Aslihan Yener*
Affiliation:
Alalakh Excavations Hatay and Amuq Valley Regional Projects, Koç University, Department of Archaeology and History of Art, Rumeli Fener Yolu 34450, Sariyer, Istanbul, Turkey, www.alalakh.org
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

It has long been suspected that the use of iron predated the so-called meteoric and smelted iron of the later stages of prehistory. Certainly small objects of iron such as awls and pins are found from the Chalcolithic period onwards and the rightly famous iron swords from Alaca Höyük demonstrate skills in making larger weapons in the Early Bronze Age. I document the use of iron ore for hammers and maces at Early Bronze Age sites in the Taurus Mountains and early Chalcolithic Tell Kurdu in the Amuq valley. This intensive understanding of materials and their properties led, millennia later, to the ability to smelt terrestrial iron.

Type
Research Article
Information
IRAQ , Volume 72 , 2010 , pp. 183 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © The British Institute for the Study of Iraq 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, R. McC. 2000: “Accelerated technological change in archaeology and ancient history”, in Feinman, Gary M. and Manzanilla, Linda (eds.), Cultural Evolution: Contemporary Viewpoints, 95–119. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Aksoy, Behin 1991: “Prehistoric and early historic pottery of the Bolkardağ mining district”, in Guen-Pollet, Brigitte Le and Pelon, Olivier (eds.), La Cappadoce méridionale jusqu'à la fin de l'époque romains. État des recherches, 11–14. Paris: Éditions Recherche sur les Civilisations.Google Scholar
Erkanal, H. 1977: “Die Äxte und Beile des 2. Jahrtausends in Zentralanatolien”, Prähistorische Bronzefunde Abteilung IX. Band 8. Munich: C. H. Beck.Google Scholar
Hawkins, J. D. 2000: Corpus of Hieroglyphic Luwian Inscriptions, Vol. 1: Inscriptions of the Iron Age. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
McConchie, Matasha 2004: Archaeology at the North-East Anatolian Frontier, V. Iron Technology and Iron-Making Communities of the First Millennium BC. Louvain: Peeters.Google Scholar
Maxwell-Hyslop, Rachel 1953: “Bronze lugged axe or adze blades from Asia, Iraq 15: 69–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moorey, P. R. S. 1994: Ancient Mesopotamian Materials and Industries. The Archaeological Evidence. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rostoker, W. and Bronson, Bennet 1990: Pre-Industrial Iron. Its Technology and Ethnology. Philadelphia: Archaeomaterials Monograph 1.Google Scholar
Sax, M., Collon, D., Leese, M. N. 1993: “The availability of raw materials for Near Eastern cylinder seals during the Akkadian, Post Akaddian and Ur III Periods, Iraq 55: 77–90.Google Scholar
Tylecote, R. F. 1981: “Iron sands from the Black Sea”, Anatolian Studies 31: 137–9.Google Scholar
Waldbaum, J. C. 1980: “The first archaeological appearance of iron and the transition to the Iron Age”, in Wertime, T. E. and Muhly, J. D. (eds.), The Coming of the Age of Iron, 69–97. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Waldbaum, J. C. 1999: “The coming of iron in the eastern Mediterranean. Thirty years of archaeological and technological research”, in Pigott, Vincent C. (ed.), The Archaeometallurgy of the Asian Old World, 27–57. MASCA Research Papers Vol. 16. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Wayman, Michael In preparation: “Metallographic examination of Iron Pin 1195 from Göltepe”, in Yener, K. A. (ed.), Göltepe Excavations. An Early Bronze Age Mining Town: The Production of Tin in the Central Taurus Mountains, Turkey (2 vols.).Google Scholar
Woolley, C. L. 1955: Alalakh. An Account of the Excavations at Tell Atchana in the Hatay, 1937–1949. Report of the Research Committee, 18. London: Society of Antiquaries.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A. 1986: “The archaeometry of silver in Anatolia: The Bolkardag mining district”, American Journal of Archaeology 90: 469–72.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A. 2000: The Domestication of Metals: The Rise of Complex Metal Industries in Anatolia (c. 4500–2000 B.C.). Leiden: E. J. Brill.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A. 2006: “Transformative impulses in Late Bronze Age technology: A case study from the Amuq Valley, Southern Turkey”, in Stone, E. (ed.), Settlement and Society: Essays Dedicated to Robert McCormick Adams, 360–85. Los Angeles: Cotsen Institute of Archaeology at UCLA.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A. and Özbal, H. 1986: “The Bolkardag mining district survey of silver and lead metals in Ancient Anatolia”, in Olin, J. S. and Blackman, M. J. (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th International Archaeometry Symposium, 309–20. Washington D.C.: The Smithsonian Institution.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A., Ozbal, H., Minzoni-Deroche, A. and Aksoy, B. 1989: “Bolkardağ: archaeometallurgy surveys in the Taurus Mountains, Turkey”, National Geographic Research 5/3: 477–94.Google Scholar
Yener, K. A., Edens, Christopher, Casana, Jesse, Diebold, Benjamin, Ekstrom, Heidi, Loyet, Michelle, and Ozbal, Rana 2000: “Tell Kurdu excavations 1999”, Anatolica 26: 31–117.Google Scholar