Hostname: page-component-7c8c6479df-fqc5m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-03-28T22:44:03.669Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vegetation classification enables inferring mesoscale spatial variation in plant invasibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 October 2019

Yue M. Li*
Affiliation:
Postdoctoral Research Associate, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA Conservation Research Scientist, Arizona–Sonora Desert Museum, Tucson, AZ, USA
Brett Stauffer
Affiliation:
Private GIS Analyst, New Berlin, WI, USA
Jim Malusa
Affiliation:
Research Scientist, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Yue M. Li, School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona, 1064 East Lowell Street, Tucson, AZ 85721. (Email: liyue@email.arizona.edu)

Abstract

Large-scale control of invasive plants can benefit strongly from reliable assessment of spatial variation in plant invasibility. With this knowledge, limited management resources can be concentrated in areas of high invasion risk. We assessed the influence of spatial environments and proximity to roads on the invasibility of African mustard (Brassica tournefortii Gouan) over the 280,000-ha Barry M. Goldwater Range West in southwestern Arizona, USA. We used presence/absence data of B. tournefortii acquired from a vegetation classification project, in which lands were mapped to the level of vegetation subassociations. Logistic regression models suggested that spatial environments represented by the subassociations, not proximity to roads, represented the only factor significantly explaining B. tournefortii presence. We then used the best model to predict B. tournefortii invasibility in each subassociation. This prediction indicates management strategy should differ between the western part and the central to eastern part of the range. The western range is a large spatial continuum with intermediate to high invasion risk, vulnerable to an untethered spread of B. tournefortii. Controlling efforts should focus on preventing existing local populations from further expansion. The central and eastern ranges are a mosaic varying strongly in invasion risk. Control efforts can take advantage of natural invasion barriers and further reduce connectivity through removal of source populations connected with other high-risk locations via roads and other dispersal corridors. We suggest our approach as one effective way to combine vegetation classification and plant invasion assessment to manage complex landscapes over large ranges, especially when this approach is used through an iterative prediction–validation process to achieve adaptive management of invasive plants.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© Weed Science Society of America, 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abella, SR, Spencer, JE, Hoines, J, Nazarchyk, C (2009) Assessing an exotic plant surveying program in the Mojave Desert, Clark County, Nevada, USA. Environ Monit Assess 151:221230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barrows, CW, Allen, EB, Brooks, ML, Allen, MF (2009) Effects of an invasive plant on a desert sand dune landscape. Biol Invasions 11:673686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berry, KH, Gowan, TA, Miller, DM, Brooks, ML (2014) Models of invasion and establishment for African mustard (Brassica tournefortii). Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:599616CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, J, Hastings, A, Costello, C (2010) Cost-effective management of invasive species using linear-quadratic control. Ecol Econ 69:519527CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brooks, ML (2009) Spatial and temporal distribution of non-native plants in upland areas of the Mojave Desert. Pages 101124 in Webb, RH, Fenstermaker, LF, Heaton, JS, Hughson, DL, McDonald, EV, Miller, DM, eds. The Mojave Desert: Ecosystem Processes and Sustainability. Reno: University of Nevada PressGoogle Scholar
Brown, LD, ed (1982) Biotic Communities of the American Southwest–United States and Mexico. Tucson: University of Arizona. 342 pGoogle Scholar
Brown, LD, Cai, TT, DasGupta, A (2001) Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Stat Sci 16:101117Google Scholar
Brummer, TJ, Taylor, KT, Rotella, J, Maxwell, BD, Rew, LJ, Lavin, M (2016) Drivers of Bromus tectorum abundance in the western North American sagebrush steppe. Ecosystems 19:9861000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chabrerie, O, Verheyen, K, Saguez, R, Decocq, G (2008) Disentangling relationships between habitat conditions, disturbance history, plant diversity, and American black cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.) invasion in a European temperate forest. Divers Distrib 14:204212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chang, L-W, Zelený, D, Li, C-F, Chiu, S-T, Hsieh, C-F (2013) Better environmental data may reverse conclusions about niche- and dispersal-based processes in community assembly. Ecology 94:21452151CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chytrý, M, Schaminée, JHJ, Schwabe, A (2011) Vegetation survey: a new focus for applied vegetation science. Appl Veg Sci 14:435439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coudun, C, Gégout, J-C, Piedallu, C, Rameau, J-C (2006) Soil nutritional factors improve models of plant species distribution: an illustration with Acer campestre (L.) in France. J Biogeogr 33:17501763CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craig, DJ, Craig, JE, Abella, SR, Vanier, CH (2010) Factors affecting exotic annual plant cover and richness along roadsides in the eastern Mojave Desert, USA. J Arid Environ 74:702707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietze, MC, Fox, A, Beck-Johnson, LM, Betancourt, JL, Hooten, MB, Jarnevich, CS, Keitt, TH, Kenney, MA, Laney, CM, Larsen, LG, Loescher, HW, Lunch, CK, Pijanowski, BC, Randerson, JT, Read, EK, Tredennick, AT, Vargas, R, Weathers, KC, White, EP (2018) Iterative near-term ecological forecasting: needs, opportunities, and challenges. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:14241432CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elith, J, Kearney, M, Phillips, S (2010) The art of modelling range-shifting species. Methods Ecol Evol 1:330342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elith, J, Leathwick, JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:677697CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epanchin-Niell, RS, Hastings, A (2010) Controlling established invaders: integrating economics and spread dynamics to determine optimal management. Ecol Lett 13:528541CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, RA, Love, RM (1957) The step-point method of sampling: a practical tool in range research. J Range Manage 10:208212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federal Geographic Data Committee (2008) National Vegetation Classification Standard. Version 2. FGDC-STD-005-2008. Reston, VA: Federal Geographic Data CommitteeGoogle Scholar
Fox, J, Weisberg, S (2011) An R Companion to Applied Regression. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage. 472 pGoogle Scholar
Giljohann, KM, Hauser, CE, Williams, NSG, Moore, JL (2011) Optimizing invasive species control across space: willow invasion management in the Australian Alps. J Appl Ecol 48:12861294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greig-Smith, P (1979) Pattern in vegetation. J Ecol 67:755779CrossRefGoogle Scholar
HilleRisLambers, J, Adler, PB, Harpole, WS, Levine, JM, Mayfield, MM (2012) Rethinking community assembly through the lens of coexistence theory. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 43:227248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, MD, Faber-Langendoen, D, Loucks, OL, Peet, RK, Roberts, D (2009) Standards for associations and alliances of the U.S. National Vegetation Classification. Ecol Monogr 79:173199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, MM, Tuomisto, H, Borcard, D, Legendre, P, Clark, DB, Olivas, PC (2008) Explaining variation in tropical plant community composition: influence of environmental and spatial data quality. Oecologia 155:593604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jørgensen, RH, Kollmann, J (2009) Invasion of coastal dunes by the alien shrub Rosa rugosa is associated with roads, tracks and houses. Flora Morphol Distrib Funct Ecol Plants 204:289297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levine, JM (2000) Species diversity and biological invasions: relating local process to community pattern. Science 288:852854CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, YM, Dlugosch, KM, Enquist, BJ (2015) Novel spatial analysis methods reveal scale-dependent spread and infer limiting factors of invasion by Sahara mustard. Ecography 38:311320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, BG, Lindenmayer, DB (2001) Towards a hierarchical framework for modelling the spatial distribution of animals. J Biogeogr 28:11471166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malusa, J, Halvorson, B, Angell, D (2003) Distribution of the exotic mustard Brassica tournefortii in the Mohawk Dunes and Mountains, Arizona. Desert Plants 19:3136Google Scholar
Malusa, J, Sundt, P (2015) Vegetation of the Barry M. Goldwater Range West, Marine Corps Air Station–Yuma, Arizona. Tucson: School of Natural Resources and the Environment, University of Arizona. 308 pGoogle Scholar
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (2013) A Handbook for Collecting Vegetation Plot Data in Minnesota: The Relevé Method. 2nd ed. St. Paul: State of Minnesota, Department of Natural Resources. 64 pGoogle Scholar
Mucina, L, Schaminée, JHJ, Rodwell, JS (2000) Common data standards for recording relevés in field survey for vegetation classification. J Veg Sci 11:769772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roura-Pascual, N, Krug, RM, Richardson, DM, Hui, C (2010) Spatially-explicit sensitivity analysis for conservation management: exploring the influence of decisions in invasive alien plant management. Divers Distrib 16:426438CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rousset, F, Ferdy, J (2014) Testing environmental and genetic effects in the presence of spatial autocorrelation. Ecography 37:781790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sanchez-Flores, E (2007) GARP modeling of natural and human factors affecting the potential distribution of the invasives Schismus arabicus and Brassica tournefortii in “El Pinacate y Gran Desierto de Altar” Biosphere Reserve. Ecol Model 204:457474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simberloff, D (2009) The role of propagule pressure in biological invasions. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 40:81102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[USNVC] U.S. National Vegetation Classification (2018) United States National Vegetation Classification Database. Version 2.02. Washington, DC: Federal Geographic Data Committee, Vegetation SubcommitteeGoogle Scholar
Van Devender, TR, Felger, RS, Búrquez, A (1997) Exotic plants in the Sonoran Desert region, Arizona and Sonora. Pages 16 in Proceedings of the California Exotic Pest Plant Council Symposium. Berkeley: California Exotic Pest Plant CouncilGoogle Scholar
VanTassel, HLH, Hansen, AM, Barrows, CW, Latif, Q, Simon, MW, Anderson, KE (2013) Declines in a ground-dwelling arthropod community during an invasion by Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii) in aeolian sand habitats. Biol Invasions 16:16751687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, DE (2017) Effects of Climate Change on Protected and Invasive Plant Species. Ph.D dissertation. Irvine: University of California, Irvine eScholarship. 472 pGoogle Scholar
Winkler, DE, Gremer, JR, Chapin, KJ, Kao, M, Huxman, TE (2018) Rapid alignment of functional trait variation with locality across the invaded range of Sahara mustard (Brassica tournefortii). Am J Bot 105:11881197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zuur, AF, Ieno, EN, Elphick, CS (2010) A protocol for data exploration to avoid common statistical problems. Methods Ecol Evol 1:314CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material 1

Download Li et al. supplementary material(Image)
Image 29.1 MB
Supplementary material: File

Li et al. supplementary material

Li et al. supplementary material 2

Download Li et al. supplementary material(File)
File 96 KB