Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Point Mapping Integrates Data Collection and Weed Control Operations

  • Craig C. Young (a1), Jordan C. Bell (a1), Chad S. Gross (a1), Lloyd W. Morrison (a1) and Jennifer L. Haack-Gaynor (a1)...

Abstract

In this case study, we evaluated a point-mapping method for simultaneously collecting data while controlling three invasive woody plant species: black locust, Chinese privet, and hardy orange. The study in Arkansas Post National Memorial included seven project areas ranging in size from 2.7 to 27.3 ha and spanned six field seasons (2010 to 2015). The control techniques varied depending on plant size and always included the application of herbicide, which also varied over the course of the study to include glyphosate, imazapyr, and triclopyr. Each person responsible for controlling plants simultaneously collected global positioning system point data to estimate the foliar cover of the plants treated. The resulting data demonstrated evidence of decreases in all three plant species in most project areas during the 6-yr period. Initial increases in area treated for some species–area combinations reflected differences in the preliminary efforts required to control invasive plants in entire project areas, but by 2012 six of seven project areas were treated in their entirety. Despite a high level of reduction, in some cases, the plants persisted at low levels even during the sixth year of the project. Our findings support the ability of this method to granularly detect changes in plant abundance while simultaneously controlling invasive plants. With several acknowledged limitations, this streamlined project-based monitoring approach provides data that allow managers to assess the effectiveness of weed control treatments.

Copyright

Corresponding author

*Corresponding author’s E-mail: craig_young@nps.gov

Footnotes

Hide All

Associate Editor for this paper: Stephen F. Enloe, University of Florida.

Footnotes

References

Hide All
Abella, SR (2014) Effectiveness of exotic plant treatments on National Park Service lands in the United States. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7:147163
Balint, PJ, Stewart, RE, Desai, A (2011) Wicked environmental problems: managing uncertainty and conflict. Washington, DC: Island Press
Barnett, DT, Stohlgren, TJ, Jarnevich, CS, Chong, GW, Ericson, J A, Davern, TR, Simonson, SE (2007) The art and science of weed mapping. Environ Monit Assess 132:235252
Bonanno, G (2016) Alien species: to remove or not to remove? That is the question. Environ Sci Policy 59:6773
Cabin, RJ (2007) Science‐driven restoration: a square grid on a round Earth? Restor Ecol 15:17
Christensen, SD, Ransom, CV, Edvarchuk, KA, Rasmussen, VP (2011) Efficiency and accuracy of wildland weed mapping methods. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:458465
Davies, KW, Johnson, DD (2011) Are we “missing the boat” on preventing the spread of invasive plants in rangelands? Invasive Plant Sci Manag 4:166171
Davis, MA (2009) Invasion Biology. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp 111
Davis, MA, Chew, MK, Hobbs, RJ, Lugo, AE, Ewel, JJ, Vermeij, GJ, Brown, JH, Rosenzweig, ML, Gardener, MR, Carroll, SP, Thompson, K (2011) Don’t judge species on their origins. Nature 474:153154
Dewey, SA, Andersen, KS (2004) Distinct roles of surveys, inventories, and monitoring in adaptive weed management. Weed Technol 18:14491452
DiTomaso, JM (2000) Invasive weeds in rangelands: species, impacts, and management Weed Sci 48:255265
Elzinga, CL, Salzer, DW, Willoughby, JW (1998) Measuring and Monitoring Plant Populations. Denver, CO: Bureau of Land Management Technical Reference 17301731
Fisher, CE, Meadors, CH, Behrens, R, Robinson, ED, Marion, PT, Morton, HL (1959) Control of mesquite on grazing lands. Texas Agricultural Experiment Station Bulletin 935. College Station, TX: Texas Agricultural Experiment Station. 24 p
Gardiner, E, Stanturf, J, Leininger, T, Hamel, P, Dorris, L, Portwood, J, Shepard, J (2008) Establishing a research and demonstration area initiated by managers: the Sharkey Restoration Research and Demonstration Site. J Forest 106:363369
Georgia Exotic Pest Plant Council (2015) List of Non-native Plants in Georgia. http://www.gaeppc.org/list. Accessed: November 15, 2015
Giardina, CP, Litton, CM, Thaxton, JM, Cordell, S, Hadway, LJ, Sandquist, DR (2007) Science driven restoration: a candle in a demon haunted world—response to Cabin (2007). Restor Ecol 15:171176
Hammond, JS, Keeney, RL, Raiffa, H (1999) Smart Choices. New York: Broadway Books
Heath, C, Heath, D (2013) Decisive: How to Make Better Choices in Life and Work. New York: Crown Business
Hodur, NM, Leistritz, FL, Bangsund, DA (2006) Evaluation of TEAM leafy spurge project. Rangeland Ecol Manag 59:483493
Johnson, DH, Soma, MB (2012) The treatment of missing data in long-term monitoring programs. Pages 298312 in Gitzen RA, Millspaugh JJ, Cooper AB & Licht DS, eds. Design and Analysis of Long-term Ecological Monitoring Studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press
Kettenring, KM, Adams, CR (2011) Lessons learned from invasive plant control experiments: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Appl Ecol 48:970979
Lindenmayer, DB, Wood, J, MacGregor, C, Buckley, YM, Dexter, N, Fortescue, M, Hobbs, RJ, Catford, JA (2015) A long-term experimental case study of the ecological effectiveness and cost effectiveness of invasive plant management in achieving conservation goals: Bitou Bush control in Booderee National Park in Eastern Australia. PLoS One 10:e0128482
MacDougall, AS, Turkington, R (2005) Are invasive species the drivers or passengers of change in degraded ecosystems? Ecology 86:4255
Morrison, LW (2016) Observer error in vegetation surveys: a review. J Plant Ecol 9:367379
NatureServe (2015) NatureServe Explorer: An Online Encyclopedia of Life [Web application]. Version 7.0. http://explorer.natureserve.org. Accessed: November 15, 2015
North American Invasive Species Management Association (2014) Mapping Standards. http://www.naisma.org/mapping-standards. Accessed: April 4, 2016
Pearson, D, Ortega, Y (2009) Managing invasive plants in natural areas: moving beyond weed control. Pages 121 in Kingely RV, ed. Weeds: Management, Economic Impacts and Biology. Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science Publishers
Pokorny, ML, Dewey, SA, Radosevich, SR (2006) Getting started: fundamentals of nonindigenous plant species inventory/survey. Pages 816 in Rew LJ & Pokorny ML, eds. Survey Methods for Nonindigenous Plant Species. Bozeman, MT: Montana State University Extension
Randall, JM (1996) Weed control for the preservation of biological diversity. Weed Technol 1:370383
Ransom, CV, Christensen, SD, Edvarchuk, KA, Naumann, T (2012) A reinventory of invasive weed species in Dinosaur National Monument to determine management effectiveness. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 5:300309
Rejmánek, M, Pitcairn, MJ (2002) When is eradication of exotic pest plants a realistic goal? Pages 249253 in Veith CR & Clout MN, eds. Turning the Tide: The Eradication of Invasive Species. Auckland, NZ: International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources
Rinella, MJ, Maxwell, BD, Fay, PK, Weaver, T, Sheley, RL (2009) Control effort exacerbates invasive-species problem. Ecol Appl 19:155162
Schramm, P (1970) A practical restoration method for tall-grass prairie. Pages 6365 in Schramm P, ed. Proceedings of a Symposium on Prairie and Prairie Restoration. Galesburg, IL: Knox College
Shackelford, N, Hobbs, RJ, Heller, NE, Hallett, LM, Seastedt, TR (2013) Finding a middle-ground: the native/non-native debate. Biol Conserv 28:5562
Shea, K, Possingham, HP, Murdoch, WW, Roush, R (2002) Active adaptive management in insect pest and weed control: intervention with a plan for learning. Ecol Appl 12:927936
Sheley, R, James, J, Smith, B, Vasquez, E (2010) Applying ecologically based invasive-plant management. Rangeland Ecol Manag 6:605613
Sheley, RL, Mangold, JM, Anderson, JL (2006) Potential for successional theory to guide restoration of invasive-plant-dominated rangeland. Ecol Monogr 76:365379
Simberloff, D (2011) Non-natives: 141 scientists object Nature 475:36
Simberloff, D, Martin, JL, Genovesi, P, Maris, V, Wardle, DA, Aronson, J, Courchamp, F, Galil, B, García-Berthou, E, Pascal, M, Pyšek, P (2013) Impacts of biological invasions: what’s what and the way forward. Trends Ecol Evol 28:5866
Skurski, TC, Maxwell, BD, Rew, LJ (2013) Ecological tradeoffs in non-native plant management. Biol Conserv 159:292302
Smith, EP (2002) BACI design (Pages 141148 in El-Shaarai AH & Piegorsch WW, eds. Encyclopedia of Environmetrics. Chichester, UK: Wiley
Stone, KR (2009) Robinia pseudoacacia. In Fire Effects Information System. http://www.fs.fed.us/database/feis. Accessed: December 8, 2015
Sutherland, WJ (2006) Ecological Census Techniques. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pp 1185
Texas Invasives (2015) Invasives Database. http://www.texasinvasives.org/plant_database/index.php. Accessed: November 15, 2015
Tienes, M, Skogen, K, Vitt, P, Havens, K (2010) Optimal monitoring of rare plant populations—report for the USDA Forest Service. Glencoe, IL: Chicago Botanic Garden. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/299343219_Optimal_Monitoring_of_Rare_Plant_Populations_Report_for_the_USDA_Forest_Service. Accessed: April 4, 2016
Timmons, FL (2005) A history of weed control in the United States and Canada. Weed Sci 53:748761
Wagner, RG, Newton, M, Cole, EC, Miller, JH, Shiver, BD (2004) The role of herbicides for enhancing forest productivity and conserving land for biodiversity in North America. Nat Area J 32:10281041

Keywords

Point Mapping Integrates Data Collection and Weed Control Operations

  • Craig C. Young (a1), Jordan C. Bell (a1), Chad S. Gross (a1), Lloyd W. Morrison (a1) and Jennifer L. Haack-Gaynor (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed