Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Approaches for Assessing the Status of Nonnative Plants: A Comparative Analysis

  • Alison M. Fox (a1) and Doria R. Gordon (a2)

Abstract

The magnitude of the invasive plant species problem necessitates prioritization of species for control, regulatory, and public-education programs. Many such priority lists exist but few have been developed according to specified procedures and criteria. We reviewed approaches to assessing the status of nonnative plant species currently occurring in natural areas (status assessments). We identify four generalized types of status assessments, which reflect a gradation from those that simply adopt existing lists from elsewhere (type 1), to those with relatively easy and rapid development and implementation (type 2), to those that are more time-consuming and costly but may be more robust in the face of challenges (types 3 and 4). These latter assessments explicitly have greater transparency, objectivity, and consistency than the other types. We use a matrix of assessment characteristics to distinguish the types of 17 example status assessments. We also review the factors related to assessment intent, scope, structure, content, and implementation that must be considered during the development of new status assessments so that the resulting tool and its products are appropriate for the user's purposes. These analyses should facilitate evaluation of different assessment methods and provide a basis for development of improved assessments. Identification of the relatively low percentage of nonnative plant species that are inflicting ecological and economic harm using well-understood and accepted assessment methods should facilitate a more comprehensive, collective approach to implementation of effective management efforts.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Corresponding author's E-mail:dgordon@tnc.org

References

Hide All
Anonymous 2006. HB 294-2006 National Post-Border Weed Risk Management Protocol. Sydney Standards Australia International Ltd.; Auckland: Standards New Zealand; Adelaide: CRC Australian Weed Management. 76.
Backstrom, C. H. and Hursh-Cesar, G. 1981. Survey Research. New York McGraw-Hill. 436.
Brown, T. C. 1997. The state's role. Pages 339356. In Simberloff, D., Schmitz, D. C., and Brown, T. C. Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Washington, DC Island.
Caley, P. and Kuhnert, P. 2006. Application and evaluation of classification trees for screening unwanted plants. Aust. Ecol 31:647655.
Cathey, H. M. 1990. USDA Plant Hardiness Zone Map. USDA Miscellaneous Publication No. 1475. Washington, DC U.S. National Arboretum, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. http://www.usna.usda.gov/Hardzone/hzm-se1.html. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Champion, P. D. and Clayton, J. S. 2001. A weed risk assessment model for aquatic weeds in New Zealand. Pages 194202. In Groves, R. H., Panetta, F. D., and Virtue, J. G. Weed Risk Assessment. Collingwood, Australia CSIRO.
Daehler, C. C., Denslow, J. S., Ansari, S., and Kuo, H. 2004. A risk assessment system for screening out invasive pest plants from Hawai‘i and other Pacific Islands. Conserv. Biol 18:360368.
Environmental Law Institute 2002. Halting the Invasion: State Tools for Invasive Species Management. http://www.elistore.org/reports_detail.aspID10678. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Florida Invasive Species Working Group 2005. 2005 Annual Report of the Statewide Invasive Species Working Group. http://www.iswgfla.org/news/PDF/Annual20Report20for202005.pdf. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Fox, A. M. and Gordon, D. R. 2004. Criteria for listing invasive plants. Invasive Plants in Natural and Management Ecosystems (IPINAMS-EMAPI7) Symposium. Weed Technol 18:13091313.
Fox, A. M., Gordon, D. R., Dusky, J. A., Tyson, L. L., and Stocker, R. K. 2000. The story behind the IFAS assessment of non-native plants in Florida's natural areas. Wildland Weeds Mag. Fla. Exot. Pest Plant Counc 3/4:47.
Fox, A. M., Gordon, D. R., and Stocker, R. K. 2003. Challenges of reaching consensus on assessing which non-native plants are invasive in natural areas in Florida. HortScience 38:1113.
Gordon, D. R. 1998. Effects of invasive, non-indigenous plant species in ecosystem processes: lessons from Florida. Ecol. Appl 8:975989.
Gordon, D. R., Fox, A. M., Onderdonk, D. A., Stocker, R. K., and Gantz, C. 2008. Predicting invasive plants in Florida using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:178195.
Gordon, D. R. and Thomas, K. P. 1997. Introduction of invasive non-indigenous plants into Florida: history, screening and regulatory approaches. Pages 2137. in: Simberloff, D., Schmitz, D. C., and Brown, T. C. Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Washington, DC Island.
Groves, R. H., Panetta, F. D., and Virtue, J. G. 2001. Weed Risk Assessment. Collingwood, Australia CSIRO. 244.
Heffernan, K. E., Coulling, P. P., Townsend, J. F., and Hutto, C. J. 2001. Ranking Invasive Exotic Plant Species in Virginia. Natural Heritage Technical Report 01-13. Richmond, VA: Virginia Department of Conservation and Recreation, Division of Natural Heritage. 27. http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/natural_heritage/documents/rankinv.pdf. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Hiebert, R. D. and Stubbendieck, J. 1993. Handbook for Ranking Exotic Plants for Management and Control. Denver, CO: U.S. Department of Interior Natural Resources Report NPS/NRMWRO/NRR-93/08. 48.
Hobbs, R. J. and Humphries, S. E. 1995. An integrated approach to the ecology and management of plant invasions. Conserv. Biol 9:761770.
Hodges, A. W. and Mulkey, W. D. 2006. Economic Impacts of Agricultural and Natural Resource Industries in Florida, 2003. Gainesville, FL University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences EDIS document FE627. http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/FE627. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Kowarik, I. 1995. Time lags in biological invasions with regard to the success and failure of alien species. Pages 1538. In Pysek, P., Rejmanek, M., and Wade, M. Plant Invasions—General Aspects and Special Problems. Amsterdam Academic.
Langeland, K. A. 2002. Proper uses of FLEPPC's List of Invasive Species. Wildland Weeds Mag. Fla. Exot. Pest Plant Counc 5/3:1617.
Lee, D. 2005. The private cost of upland invasive plants in Florida. Tallahassee, FL: Report to Florida Commissioner of Agriculture Charles Bronson. http://iswgfla.org/files/Lee20-20Private20costs20Uplands2005.pdf. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Lippincott, C. 1996. Estimates of cultivated, native, naturalized, and weedy plant species in Florida. Palmetto 16/2:12.
Malakoff, D. 1999. Plan to import exotic beetle drives some scientists wild. Science 248/5418:1255.
Massachusetts Invasive Plant Advisory Group 2005. The Evaluation of Non-Native Plant Species for Invasiveness in Massachusetts (with annotated list). http://www.newfs.org/protect/docs/docs/MIPAG040105.pdf. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Naylor, R. L. 2000. The economics of alien species invasion. Pages 241259. In Mooney, H. A. and Hobbs, R. J. Invasive Species in a Changing World. Washington, DC Island.
Pheloung, P. C., Williams, P. A., and Halloy, S. R. 1999. A weed risk assessment model for use as a biosecurity tool evaluating plant introductions. J. Environ. Manag 57:239251.
Pimentel, D., Zuniga, R., and Morrison, D. 2005. Update on the environmental and economic costs associated with alien-invasive species in the United States. Ecol. Econ 52:273288.
Randall, J. R., Morse, L. E., Benton, N., Hiebert, R., Lu, S., and Killeffer, T. 2008. The Invasive Species Assessment Protocol: A tool for creating regional and national lists of invasive nonnative plants that negatively impact biodiversity. Invasive Plant Sci. Manag 1:3649.
Reichard, S. H. and Hamilton, C. W. 1997. Predicting invasions of woody plants introduced into North America. Conserv. Biol 11:193203.
Rhode Island Invasive Species Council 2001. Rhode Island Invasive Species Council: Listing Criteria. http://www.rinhs.org/what-we-do/invasives/ri-invasive-species-resources/-criteria/. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Robertson, M. P., Villet, M. H., Fairbanks, D. H. K., Henderson, L., Higgins, S. I., Hoffmann, J. H., Le Maitre, D. C., Palmer, A. R., Riggs, I., Shackleton, C. M., and Zimmermann, H. G. 2003. A proposed prioritization system for the management of invasive alien plants in South Africa. S.Afr. J. Sci 99:3743.
Simberloff, D. 1997. The biology of invasions. Pages 317. In Simberloff, D., Schmitz, D. C., and Brown, T. C. Strangers in Paradise: Impact and Management of Nonindigenous Species in Florida. Washington, DC Island.
Thorp, J. R. and Lynch, R. 2000. The Determination of Weeds of National Significance. http://www.weeds.org.au/docs/WoNS/. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Vitousek, P., Loope, L., D'Antonio, C., and Hassol, S. J. 1995. Biological invasions as global change. Pages 213336. In Hassol, S. J. and Katzenberger, J. Elements of Change 1994. Aspen, CO Aspen Global Change Institute.
Weiss, J. E. R. and Iaconis, L. J. 2002. Pest Plant Invasiveness Assessment. http://www.dpi.vic.gov.au/dpi/vro/vrosite.nsf/pages/invasive. Accessed: January 19, 2009.
Wilcove, D. S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Philips, A., and Losos, E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48:607615.
Williamson, M. 1996. Biological Invasions. London Chapman and Hall. 244.

Keywords

Approaches for Assessing the Status of Nonnative Plants: A Comparative Analysis

  • Alison M. Fox (a1) and Doria R. Gordon (a2)

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed