Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T13:06:09.850Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Validation of telephone-based behavioral assessments in aging services clients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 September 2017

Yeates Conwell ,
Adam Simning ,
Nicole Driffill ,
Yinglin Xia ,
Xin Tu ,
Susan P. Messing  and
David Oslin
Yeates Conwell*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (URSMD), Rochester, New York, USA
Adam Simning
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (URSMD), Rochester, New York, USA
Nicole Driffill
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Rochester School of Medicine and Dentistry (URSMD), Rochester, New York, USA
Yinglin Xia
Affiliation:
Department of Medicine, University of Illinois College of Medicine at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
Xin Tu
Affiliation:
Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
Susan P. Messing
Affiliation:
Department of Biostatistics, URSMD, Rochester, New York, USA
David Oslin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, University of Pennsylvania and the Cpl Michael J Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Yeates Conwell, MD, Professor of Psychiatry, University of Rochester Medical Center, 300 Crittenden Blvd., Rochester, NY 14642, USA. Phone: (585) 275–6739; Fax: (585) 273–1066. Email: yeates_conwell@urmc.rochester.edu.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background:

The Behavioral Health Laboratory (BHL), a telephone-based mental health assessment, is a cost-effective approach that can improve mental illness identification and management. The individual BHL instruments, which were originally designed to be administered in-person, have not yet been validated with an in-person BHL assessment. This study therefore aims to characterize the concordance between the BHL data gathered by telephone and in-person interviews.

Methods:

A cross-sectional study was conducted with English-speaking aging services network (ASN) clients aged 60 years and older in Monroe County, NY who were randomized to a BHL interview either in-person (n = 55) or by telephone (n = 53).

Results:

There was strong evidence of equivalence between telephone and in-person interviews for depressive disorders, generalized anxiety, panic disorder, drug misuse, psychosis, PTSD, mental illness symptom severity, and five of the six questions assessing suicidality. There was marginal equivalence in PHQ-9 total scores and one of the six questions assessing suicidal ideation, and no evidence of equivalence between interview modalities for assessing cognitive impairment.

Conclusions:

With a few exceptions, the BHL gathered nearly equivalent information via telephone as compared to in-person interviews. This suggests that the BHL may be a cost-effective approach appropriate for dissemination in a wide variety of settings including the ASN. Dissemination of the BHL has the potential to strengthen the linkages between primary care, mental healthcare, and social service providers and improve identification and management of those with late-life mental illness.

Keywords

suicide ideationdepressiontelephone assessmentsurvey methods
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 30 , Issue 1 , January 2018 , pp. 95 - 102
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bartels, S. J. and Naslund, J. A. (2013). The underside of the silver tsunami-older adults and mental health care. The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 493–496.Google Scholar
Benjamini, Y. and Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series B (Methodological), 57, 289–300.Google Scholar
Claassen, C. et al. (2009). Telephone-based assessments to minimize missing data in longitudinal depression trials: a project IMPACTS study report. Contemporary clinical trials, 30, 13–19.Google Scholar
Conwell, Y. and Thompson, C. (2008). Suicidal behavior in elders. The Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 31, 333–356.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Conwell, Y. et al. (2000). Completed suicide among older patients in primary care practices: a controlled study. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 23–29.Google Scholar
Dorsey, E. R. and Topol, E. J. (2016). State of telehealth. The New England Journal of Medicine, 375, 154–161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fassberg, M. M. et al. (2012). A systematic review of social factors and suicidal behavior in older adulthood. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 9, 722–745.Google Scholar
Fenig, S., Levav, I., Kohn, R. and Yelin, N. (1993). Telephone vs. face-to-face interviewing in a community psychiatric survey. American Journal of Public Health, 83, 896–898.Google Scholar
Food and Drug Administration (2015). Approved Drug Products with Therapeutic Equivalence Evaluations, 35 edn. Silver Spring, MD: United States Food and Drug Administration.Google Scholar
Hedman, E. et al. (2013). Telephone versus internet administration of self-report measures of social anxiety, depressive symptoms, and insomnia: psychometric evaluation of a method to reduce the impact of missing data. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 15, e229.Google Scholar
Institute of Medicine (2012). The Mental Health and Substance use Workforce for Older Adults: In Whose Hands? Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Irvine, A., Drew, P. and Sainsbury, R. (2013). ‘Am I not answering your questions properly?’ clarification, adequacy and responsiveness in semi-structured telephone and face-to-face interviews. Qualitative Research, 13, 87–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katon, W. J., Lin, E., Russo, J. and Unutzer, J. (2003). Increased medical costs of a population-based sample of depressed elderly patients. Archives of General Psychiatry, 60, 897–903.Google Scholar
Katzman, R., Brown, T., Fuld, P., Peck, A., Schechter, R. and Schimmel, H. (1983). Validation of a short orientation-memory-concentration test of cognitive impairment. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 734–739.Google Scholar
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L. and Williams, J. B. (2001). The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16, 606–613.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S., Tsang, A., Mak, A., Lee, A., Lau, L. and Ng, K. L. (2010). Concordance between telephone survey classification and face-to-face interview diagnosis of one-year major depressive episode in Hong Kong. Journal of Affective Disorders, 126, 155–160.Google Scholar
Mclarnon, M. E., Monaghan, T. L., Stewart, S. H. and Barrett, S. P. (2011). Drug misuse and diversion in adults prescribed anxiolytics and sedatives. Pharmacotherapy, 31, 262–272.Google Scholar
O'Riley, A. A., Van Orden, K. A., He, H., Richardson, T. M., Podgorski, C. and Conwell, Y. (2014). Suicide and death ideation in older adults obtaining aging services. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 22, 614–622.Google Scholar
O'Shaughnessy, C. V. (2008). The Aging Services Network: Accomplishments and Challenges in Serving a Growing Elderly Population. Washington, DC: National Health Policy Forum.Google Scholar
Oslin, D. W., Ross, J., Sayers, S., Murphy, J., Kane, V. and Katz, I. R. (2006). Screening, assessment, and management of depression in va primary care clinics. The Behavioral Health Laboratory. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21, 46–50.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Paykel, E. S., Myers, J. K., Lindenthal, J. J. and Tanner, J. (1974). Suicidal feelings in the general population: a prevalence study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 124, 460–469.Google Scholar
Pinto-Meza, A., Serrano-Blanco, A., Penarrubia, M. T., Blanco, E. and Haro, J. M. (2005). Assessing depression in primary care with the PHQ-9: can it be carried out over the telephone? Journal of General Internal Medicine, 20, 738–742.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reddy, M. K., Fleming, M. T., Howells, N. L., Rabenhorst, M. M., Casselman, R. and Rosenbaum, A. (2006). Effects of method on participants and disclosure rates in research on sensitive topics. Violence and victims, 21, 499–506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rohde, P., Lewinsohn, P. M. and Seeley, J. R. (1997). Comparability of telephone and face-to-face interviews in assessing Axis I and II disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 154, 1593–1598.Google Scholar
Ryan, T. A., Bailey, A., Fearon, P. and King, J. (2013). Factorial invariance of the patient health questionnaire and generalized anxiety disorder questionnaire. The British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 52, 438–449.Google Scholar
Senior, A. C., Kunik, M. E., Rhoades, H. M., Novy, D. M., Wilson, N. L. and Stanley, M. A. (2007). Utility of telephone assessments in an older adult population. Psychology and Aging, 22, 392–397.Google Scholar
Sheehan, D. V. et al. (1998). The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): the development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59 (Suppl. 20), 22–33.Google Scholar
Simning, A., Richardson, T. M., Friedman, B., Boyle, L. L., Podgorski, C. and Conwell, Y. (2010). Mental distress and service utilization among help-seeking, community-dwelling older adults. International Psychogeriatrics, 22, 739–749.Google Scholar
Van Orden, K. A., Simning, A., Conwell, Y., Skoog, I. and Waern, M. (2013). Characteristics and comorbid symptoms of older adults reporting death ideation. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 803–810.Google Scholar
Ware, J. Jr., Kosinski, M. and Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34, 220–233.Google Scholar
Woodford, H. J. and George, J. (2007). Cognitive assessment in the elderly: a review of clinical methods. QJM, 100, 469–484.Google Scholar