Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Retest reliability of balance and mobility measurements in people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease

  • Plaiwan Suttanon (a1) (a2), Keith D. Hill (a2) (a3) (a4), Karen J. Dodd (a1) (a3) and Catherine M. Said (a5) (a6)

Abstract

Background: To interpret changes of balance and mobility in people with Alzheimer's disease (AD), we require measures of balance and mobility that have demonstrated reliability in this population. The aim of the study was to determine the safety, feasibility and retest reliability of clinical and forceplate balance and mobility measurements in people with AD.

Methods: Relative and absolute reliabilities were examined in 14 older people with mild to moderate AD. Relative reliability was calculated using the intraclass correlation coefficient, two-way mixed model (ICC3,1). Absolute reliability was calculated using the standard error of measurement (SEM), the minimum detectable change (MDC) and the coefficient of variation (CV).

Results: All measurements were clinically feasible and could be safely administered. ICC values were excellent and CVs were less than 11% in all clinical balance and mobility measures except the Timed Up & Go test with cognitive or manual task (ICC3,1 = 0.5 and 0.7, and CV = 14% and 10%, respectively). Most balance and mobility measures tested on the Neurocom™ forceplate (modified Clinical Test of Sensory Interaction on Balance, Walk Across (step width, step length parameters), and Sit to Stand (rising index parameter)) had excellent relative reliability (ICC3,1 ranging from 0.75 to 0.91). ICC values were fair to good for the other measures.

Conclusions: Retest reliability of the balance and mobility measures used in this study ranged between fair to good, and good to excellent. Clinicians should consider retest reliability when deciding which balance and mobility measures are used to assess people with AD.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Plaiwan Suttanon, PO Box 2127, Royal Melbourne Hospital (Royal Park Campus), VIC 3050, Australia. Phone: +61 3 8387 2383, Fax: +61 3 8387 2153. Email: p.suttanon@nari.unimelb.edu.au; psuttanon@students.latrobe.edu.au.

References

Hide All
Atkinson, G. and Nevill, A. M. (1998). Statistical methods for assessing measurement error (reliability) in variables relevant to sports medicine. Sports Medicine, 26, 217238.
Bruton, A., Conway, J. H. and Holgate, S. T. (2000). Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy, 86, 9499.
Chong, R. K. Y., Horak, F. B., Frank, J. and Kaye, J. (1999). Sensory organization for balance: specific deficits in Alzheimer's but not in Parkinson's disease. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 54, M122M128.
Dubois, B., Slachevsky, A., Litvan, I., and Pillon, B. (2000). The FAB: a frontal assessment battery at bedside. Neurology, 55, 16211626.
Duncan, P. W., Weiner, D. K., Chandler, J. and Studenski, S. (1990). Functional reach: a new clinical measure of balance. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 45, M192M197.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.
Hill, K. D., Bernhardt, J., McGann, A. M., Maltese, D. and Berkovits, D. (1996). A new test of dynamic standing balance for stroke patients: reliability, validity, and comparison with healthy elderly. Physiotherapy Canada, 48, 257262.
Hopkins, W. G. (2000). Measures of reliability in sports medicine and science. Sports Medicine, 30, 115.
Huxham, F. E., Goldie, P. A. and Patla, A. E. (2001). Theoretical considerations in balance assessment. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy, 47, 89100.
Leandri, M., Cammisuli, S., Cammarata, S., Baratto, L., Campbell, M. S. and Tabaton, M. (2009). Balance features in Alzheimer's disease and amnestic mild cognitive impairment. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 16, 113120.
Lorbach, E. R., Webster, K. E., Menz, H. B., Wittwer, J. E. and Merory, J. R. (2007). Physiological falls risk assessment in older people with Alzheimer's disease. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 24, 260265.
Manckoundia, P., Pfitzenmeyer, P., d'Athis, P., Dubost, V. and Mourey, F. (2006). Impact of cognitive task on the posture of elderly subjects with Alzheimer's disease compared to healthy elderly subjects. Movement Disorders, 21, 236241.
Menant, J. C., Steele, J. R., Menz, H. B., Munro, B. J. and Lord, S. R. (2008). Optimizing footwear for older people at risk of falls. Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 45, 11671182.
Mitnitski, A. B., Graham, J. E., Mogilner, A. J. and Rockwood, K. (1999). The rate of decline in function in Alzheimer's disease and other dementias. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 54, M65M69.
NeuroCom™ International Inc. (2003). Instructions for Use: Balance Master System Operator's Manual, Version 8.1. Clackamas, OR: NeuroCom International.
Phillips, C. D., Chu, C. W., Morris, J. N. and Hawes, C. (1993). Effects of cognitive impairment on the reliability of geriatric assessments in nursing homes. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 41, 136142.
Podsiadlo, D. and Richardson, S. (1991). The Timed Up& Go: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 39, 142148.
Rolland, Y. et al. (2009). An abnormal “one-leg balance” test predicts cognitive decline during Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 16, 525531.
Shrout, P. E. and Fleiss, J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing reliability. Psychological Bulletin, 86, 420428.
Shumway-Cook, A., Brauer, S. and Woollacott, M. (2000). Predicting the probability for falls in community-dwelling older adults using the Timed Up & Go Test. Physical Therapy, 80, 896903.
Standford, P. W. (2004). Getting more from the literature: estimating the standard error of measurement from reliability studies. Physiotherapy Canada, 56, 2730.
Stratford, P. (1989). Reliability: consistency or differentiating among subjects? Physical Therapy, 69, 299300.
Stratford, P. W. and Goldsmith, C. H. (1997). Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Physical Therapy, 77, 745750.
Tappen, R. M., Roach, K. E., Buchner, D., Barry, C. and Edelstein, J. (1997). Reliability of physical performance measures in nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease. Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences, 52A, M52M55.
Thomas, V. S. and Hageman, P. A. (2002). A preliminary study on the reliability of physical performance measures in older day-care center clients with dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 14, 1723.
van Iersel, M., Benraad, C. E. M. and Rikkert, M. G. M. O. (2007). Validity and reliability of quantitative gait analysis in geriatric patients with and without dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 55, 632634.
Walter, S. D., Eliasziw, M. and Donner, A. (1998). Sample size and optimal designs for reliability studies. Statistics in Medicine, 17, 101110.
Whitney, S. L., Wrisley, D. M., Marchetti, G. F., Gee, M. A., Redfern, M. S. and Furman, J. M. (2005). Clinical measurement of sit-to-stand performance in people with balance disorders: validity of data for the five-times-sit-to-stand test. Physical Therapy, 85, 1034.
Wittwer, J. E., Webster, K. E., Andrews, P. T. and Menz, H. B. (2008). Test-retest reliability of spatial and temporal gait parameters of people with Alzheimer's disease. Gait and Posture, 28, 392396.

Keywords

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed