Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 April 2017
Voyer and colleagues (2016) report an interesting and important comparison of ten attention/concentration tests for DSM-5 delirium. I have a number of questions and comments as follows:
(1)What training did the research assistants have? DSM-5 diagnosis is generally regarded as a decision by medical specialists. When the person has prior dementia, identifying delirium is a high-level medical skill. Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia can closely mimic delirium unless the examiner focuses on behavioral triggers and the speed of cognitive decline.
(2)The requirement of taking medications twice a day may have eliminated some delirium patients with impaired swallowing or refusal to take medications.
(3)Lumping dementia, confusion, and disorientation into one label “cognitive impairment” is problematic and reduces the usefulness of Table 3.
(4)The authors used prior diagnosis of dementia as a gold standard when in fact many people with that label have mild cognitive impairment.
(5)The ten “concentration” subtests in the Hierarchic Dementia Scale (HDS) (Cole and Dastoor, 1987) are not purely indices of concentration. Serial seven subtraction is impaired in low education with normal concentration. Months of the year backwards is often ranked as both an attention and executive function test and it requires semantic knowledge. Digit span forward is a rapid attention test missing from the HDS which has been of great value in my delirium research.
(6)As expected DSM-5 delirium was more common among medical inpatients than long-term care residents (14.9% vs. 4.0%, Table 1).
(7)The Central Coast Australia Delirium Intervention Study (Regal, 2015) supported the gold standard to prove delirium was the speed and amplitude of both onset and recovery. In CADIS, the mean recovery of five-digit span forward was two days, six-DSF 5.6 days and Delirium Index 8.0 days.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure firstname.lastname@example.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Find out more about sending to your Kindle.
Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account.
Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.
To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account.
Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.
Cole, M. G. and Dastoor, D. P. (1987). A new hierarchic approach to measurement of dementia. Psychosomatics, 28, 298–304.
Regal, P. (2015). A new delirium phenotype with rapid high amplitude onset and nearly as rapid reversal: central Coast Australia Delirium Intervention Study (CADIS). Clinical Interventions in Aging, 10, 473–480.
Voyer, P., Champoux, N., Desrosiers, J. and Landreville, P. (2016). Assessment of inattention in the context of delirium screening: one size does not fit all. International Psychogeriatrics, 28, 1293–1301.
Recommend this journal
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this journal to your organisation's collection.