Article contents
Improving knowledge of capacity assessment
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2021
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Commentary
- Information
- International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 33 , Special Issue 9: Issue Theme: Implementation Science II , September 2021 , pp. 857 - 859
- Copyright
- © International Psychogeriatric Association 2021
References
American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging & American Psychological Association. (2008) Assessment of Older Adults with Diminished Capacity: A Handbook for Psychologists. Washington, DC: American Bar Association Commission on Law and Aging − American Psychological Association. https://www.apa.org/pi/aging/programs/assessment/.Google Scholar
Biella, M. M., de Siqueira, A. S. S., Borges, M. K. etal. (2020). Decision-making profile in older adults: the influence of cognitive impairment, premorbid intelligence and depressive symptoms. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(6), 697–703.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DuBois, J. M. (2008). Ethics in Mental Health Research: Principles, Guidance, and Cases. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, L. B., Palmer, B. W., and Karlawish, J. H. T. (2007). Frontal dysfunction and capacity to consent to treatment or research: Conceptual considerations and empirical evidence. In: Miller, B. L. and Cummings, J. L. (Eds.), The Human Frontal Lobes –Second edition (pp. 335–344). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Jeste, D. V., Eglit, G., Palmer, B. W., Martinis, J. G., Blanck, P., and Saks, E. R. (2018). Supported decision making by people with serious mental illnesses: an overview. Psychiatry: Interpersonal and Biological Processes, 81(1), 28–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, S. Y. and Appelbaum, P. S. (2006). The capacity to appoint a proxy and the possibility of concurrent proxy directives. Behavioral Sciences & The Law, 24(4), 469–478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kim, S. Y., Appelbaum, P. S., Kim, H.M. etal. (2011) Variability of judgments of capacity: Experience of capacity evaluators in a study of research consent capacity. Psychosomatics, 52(4), 346–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohn, N. A. (in press). Legislating supported decision-making. Harvard Journal on Legislation.Google Scholar
Marson, D. C., Earnst, K. S., Jamil, F., Bartolucci, A., and Harrell, L. E. (2000) Consistency of physicians’ legal standard and personal judgments of competency in patients with Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48(8), 911–918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, D. C., McInturff, B., Hawkins, L., Bartolucci, A., and Harrell, L. E. (1997). Consistency of physician judgments of capacity to consent in mild Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 45(4),
453–457.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Marson, D. C., Schmitt, F. A., Ingram, K. K., and Harrell, L. E. (1994). Determining the competency of Alzheimer patients to consent to treatment and research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8(Suppl 4), 5–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moye, J., Sabatino, C. P., and Weintraub Brendel, R. (2013) Evaluation of the capacity to appoint a healthcare proxy. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(4), 326–336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. (1979). The Belmont Report: Ethical principles and guidelines for the protection of human subjects of research. Government Printing Office. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/belmont.html; last accessed 29 April 2021.Google Scholar
Oshima, E., Takenoshita, S., Iwai, R. etal. (2020). Competency of aMCI patients to consent to cholinesterase treatment. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(2), 211–216.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, B. W. (2021). Informed consen
t. In: Panicker, S. and Stanley, B. (Eds.), Handbook of Research Ethics in Psychological Science. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Palmer, B. W. and Harmell, A. L. (2016). Assessment of healthcare decision-making capacity. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 31(6), 530–540.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Palmer, B. W., Harmell, A. L., Dunn, L. B. et a
l. (2018). (MAB) Multimedia aided consent for Alzheimer’s disease research. Clinical Gerontologist, 41(1), 20–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmigiani, G., Del Casale, A., Mandarelli, G. etal. (2021). Decisional capacity to consent to treatment and research in patients affected by Mild Cognitive Impairment. A systematic review and meta-analysis. International Psychogeriatrics, 1–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peisah, C., Lerman, Y., Herrmann, N., Rezmovitz, J., and Shulman, K. (2019). Piloting the global capacity education e-tool: can capacity be taught to health care professionals across different international jurisdictions? International Psychogeriatrics, 33, 913–916.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peterson, A., Karlawish, J., and Largent, E. (2020). Supported decision making with people at the margins of autonomy. The American Journal of Bioethics, 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Romdhani, M., Koskas, P., Kohler, S., and Drunat, O. (202
0). Assessment of the decision-making capacity of hospital discharge. International Psychogeriatrics, 32(3), 411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sessums, L. L., Zembrzuska, H., and Jackson, J. L. (20
11) Does this patient have medical decision-making capacity? JAMA, 306(4), 420–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomasma, D. C. (1984). Freedom, dependency, and the care of the very old. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 32(12), 906–914.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
- 1
- Cited by