Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

A comprehensive approach of the determinants of use of care in dementia: the Recaredem (recourse to care in dementia) cross-sectional study

  • Laetitia Rullier (a1), Céline Meillon (a1), Valérie Bergua (a1), Clément Pimouguet (a1), Magali Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand (a1), Catherine Helmer (a1), Karine Pérès (a1), Jean-François Dartigues (a1) and Hélène Amieva (a1)...

Abstract

Background:

Given the rate of the undiagnosed cases of dementia and the consequences of inappropriate care, understanding the factors that explain the use of medical and health care in dementia is a critical concern. Our objective was to identify the psychosocial and medical determinants of use of care in dementia.

Methods:

The study sample consisted of 308 participants: the persons with dementia (n = 99) selected from three French population-based cohorts (i.e. PAQUID, 3C, AMI), their family caregivers (primary, n = 96, and secondary, n = 51), and their general practitioners (n = 62). Use of care in dementia was considered according to two indicators: (1) recourse to secondary care, (2) number of community and health services used.

Results:

Multiple logistic models including sociodemographics and psychosocial variables revealed that the determinants of nonuse of care are similar both for the recourse to secondary care and for the number of community and health services used: lack of education and the contribution of the people with dementia to the decisions regarding their own care and dementia care services in the community area. In addition, satisfaction of the primary caregiver with the services used by his/her relative is associated with non-recourse to secondary care.

Conclusions:

Taken together, these results highlight the predominant role of psychosocial factors in the use of care in dementia and the importance of addressing this issue through an integrative approach including psychological, social, medical, and family dimensions.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Laetitia Rullier, Bordeaux Population Health Research Center, INSERM, University of Bordeaux, UMR 1219, 146 rue Léo Saignat, CS61292, F-33076 Bordeaux Cedex, France. Phone: 0033 5 57 57 45 38; Fax: 0033 5 57 57 14 86. Email: laetitia.rullier@u-bordeaux.fr.

References

Hide All
American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM IV), 4th edn. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
Andersen, R. M. (1995). Revisiting the behavioral model and access to medical care: does it matter? Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 36, 110. doi: 10.2307/2137284.
Bradford, A., Kunik, M. E., Schulz, P., Williams, S. P. and Singh, H. (2009). Missed and delayed diagnosis of dementia in primary care: prevalence and contributing factors. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 23, 306314. doi: 10.1097/WAD.0b013e3181a6bebc.
Brayne, C., Fox, C. and Boustani, M. (2007). Dementia screening in primary care: is it time? Journal of American Medical Association, 298, 24092411. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.20.2409.
Brodaty, H., Thomson, C. and Fine, M. (2005). Why caregivers of people with dementia and memory loss don’t use services. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 20, 537546. doi: 10.1002/gps.1322.
Bush, C., Kozak, J. and Elmslie, T. (1997). Screening for cognitive impairment in the elderly. Canadian Family Physician, 43, 17631768.
Callahan, C. M., Hendrie, H. C. and Tierney, W. M. (1995). Documentation and evaluation of cognitive impairment in elderly primary care patients. Annals of Internal Medicine, 122, 422429. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-122-6-199503150-00004.
Cheema, J. R. (2014). Some general guidelines for choosing missing data handling methods in educational research. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 13, 5375. doi: 10.22237/jmasm/1414814520.
Dartigues, J. F. et al. (1992). The Paquid epidemiological program on brain ageing. Neuroepidemiology, 11, 1418. doi: 10.1159/000110955.
Dichter, M. N., Schwab, C. G., Meyer, G., Bartholomeyczik, S. and Halek, M. (2016). Linguistic validation and reliability properties are weak investigated of most dementia-specific quality of life measurements: a systematic review. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 70, 233245. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2015.08.002.
Fillit, H., Hill, J. W. and Futterman, R. (2002). Health care utilization and costs of Alzheimer’s disease: the role of co-morbid conditions, disease stage, and pharmacotherapy. Family Medicine, 34, 528535.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198. doi: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.
Helmer, C. et al. (2008). Primary and secondary care consultations in elderly demented individuals in France: results from the Three-City Study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 26, 407415. doi: 10.1159/000164692.
Hirschman, K. B., Joyce, C. M., James, B. D., Xie, S. X. and Karlawish, J. H. T. (2005). Do Alzheimer’s disease patients want to participate in a treatment decision, and would their caregivers let them? The Gerontologist, 45, 381388. doi: 10.1093/geront/45.3.381.
Hirschman, K. B., Xie, S. X., Feudtner, C. and Karlawish, J. H. T. (2004). How does an Alzheimer’s disease patient’s role in medical decision making change over time? Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry and Neurology, 17, 5560. doi: 10.1177/0891988704264540.
Katz, S., Ford, A. B., Moskowitz, R. W., Jackson, B. A. and Jaffe, M. W. (1963). Studies of illness in the aged. The index of ADL: a standardized measure of biological and psychosocial function. Journal of American Medical Association, 185, 914919. doi: 10.1001/jama.1963.03060120024016.
Kaufer, D. I. et al. (2000). Validation of the NPI-Q, a brief clinical form of the neuropsychiatric inventory. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 12, 233239. doi: 10.1176/jnp.12.2.233.
Koch, T. and Iliffe, S. (2010). EVIDEM-ED project. Rapid appraisal of barriers to the diagnosis and management of patients with dementia in primary care: a systematic review. BMC Family Practice, 11, 52. doi: 10.1186/1471-2296-11-52.
Lim, J., Goh, J., Chionh, H. L. and Yap, P. (2012). Why do patients and their families not use services for dementia? Perspectives from a developed Asian country. International Psychogeriatrics, 24, 15711580. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212000919.
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M. and Teri, L. (1999). Quality of life in Alzheimer’s disease: patient and caregiver reports. Journal of Mental Health & Aging, 5, 2132.
Mura, T., Dartigues, J. F. and Berr, C. (2010). How many dementia cases in France and Europe? Alternative projections and scenarios 2010–2050. European Journal of Neurology, 17, 252259. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2009.02783.x.
Olafsdottir, M., Skoog, I. and Marcusson, J. (2000). Detection of dementia in primary care: the Linkoping study. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 11, 223229.
Pentzek, M. et al. (2009). General practitioners’ judgment of their elderly patients’ cognitive status. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 24, 13141317. doi: 10.1007/s11606-009-1118-2.
Perales, J., Cosco, T. D., Stephan, B. C. M., Haro, J. M. and Brayne, C. (2013). Health-related quality-of-life instruments for Alzheimer’s disease and mixed dementia. International Psychogeriatrics, 25, 691706. doi: 10.1017/S1041610212002293.
Pérès, K. et al. (2012). Health and aging in elderly farmers: the AMI cohort. BMC Public Health, 12, 558. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-558.
Petrazzuoli, F. et al. (2017). Exploring dementia management attitudes in primary care: a key informant survey to primary care physicians in 25 European countries. International Psychogeriatrics, 29, 14131423. doi: 10.1017/S1041610217000552.
Pimouguet, C., Bassi, V., Somme, D., Lavallart, B., Helmer, C. and Dartigues, J. F. (2013). The 2008–2012 French Alzheimer plan: a unique opportunity for improving integrated care for dementia. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 34, 307314. doi: 10.3233/JAD-121648.
Pimouguet, C. et al. (2015). Survival and early recourse to care for dementia: a population based study. Alzheimer’s & Dementia, 11, 385393. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.512.
Prince, M., Wimo, A., Guerchet, M., Ali, G. C., Wu, Y. and Prina, A. M. (2015). World Alzheimer Report 2015: The Global Impact of Dementia. An Analysis of Prevalence, Incidence, Costs and Trends. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International.
Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385401. doi: 10.1177/014662167700100306.
Savva, G. M. and Arthur, A. (2015). Who has undiagnosed dementia? A cross-sectional analysis of participants of the Aging, Demographics and Memory Study. Age and Ageing, 44, 642647.
Scalmana, S. et al. (2013). Use of health and social care services in a cohort of Italian dementia patients. Functional Neurology, 28, 265273.
3C Study Group (2003). Vascular factors and risk of dementia: design of the Three-City Study and baseline characteristics of the study population. Neuroepidemiology, 22, 316325. doi: 10.1159/000072920.
Toseland, R. W., McCallion, P., Gerber, T. and Banks, S. (2002). Predictors of health and human services use by persons with dementia and their family caregivers. Social Science & Medicine, 55(7), 12551266. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(01)00240-4.
Zarit, S. H., Orr, N. K. and Zarit, J. M. (1983). Working with Families of Dementia Victims: A Treatment Manual. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration on Aging.

Keywords

Type Description Title
WORD
Supplementary materials

Rullier et al. supplementary material
Appendix A1

 Word (19 KB)
19 KB

A comprehensive approach of the determinants of use of care in dementia: the Recaredem (recourse to care in dementia) cross-sectional study

  • Laetitia Rullier (a1), Céline Meillon (a1), Valérie Bergua (a1), Clément Pimouguet (a1), Magali Gonzalez-Colaço Harmand (a1), Catherine Helmer (a1), Karine Pérès (a1), Jean-François Dartigues (a1) and Hélène Amieva (a1)...

Metrics

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed