Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Clinical evaluation of brief cognitive assessment measures for patients with severe dementia

  • Jasmine S. Dixon (a1), Deborah G. Saddington (a2), Celia J. Shiles (a3), Kavya P. Sreevalsan (a4), Cynthia A. Munro (a1) (a5) and Paul B. Rosenberg (a1)...

Abstract

Background:

Alzheimer's disease has become an important public health burden for older adults. Clinicians face a challenging task to efficiently evaluate cognition in dementia in clinical settings. We sought to assess the validity and inter-correlations of brief cognitive assessments in a cohort of severely demented patients.

Methods:

In total, 49 individual patients (N = 49) ranging in age from 62 to 97 years old were included in this performance improvement project. Over the course of two–three sessions, five cognitive instruments were administered to each patient: Severe Impairment Battery (SIB), Severe Impairment Battery-8 (SIB-8), Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE), Severe Mini Mental State Examination (sMMSE) and Brief Interview of Mental Status (BIMS). We sought to assess patient factors that might have been barriers to optimal performance on cognitive/functional tests. Researchers assessed her impression of the participants’ difficulty comprehending instructions, distractibility, apparent fatigue, and frustration, which were the four barriers rated.

Results:

Data were analyzed for 49 patients from the inpatient dementia unit with a total of 51 samples. All of the inter-correlations between the five cognitive instruments had Spearman coefficients of (rs) > 0.7 and were statistically significant with p < 0.001. The SIB-8 and sMMSE were positively correlated with the SIB. The perceived barrier scores ranged from 0- no issue to 1-mild issue on all five cognitive instruments.

Conclusion:

Brief cognitive tests designed for severe dementia such as the SIB-8 and sMMSE have been evaluated in this project to be shorter in administration duration and highly correlated with gold standard instruments: the SIB and MMSE.

Copyright

Corresponding author

Correspondence should be addressed to: Paul B. Rosenberg, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Phone: +(410) 550-9883; Fax: (410) 550-1407. Email: prosenb9@jhmi.edu.

References

Hide All
Auer, S. R., Sclan, S. G., Yaffee, R. A. and Reisberg, B. (1994). The neglected half of Alzheimer disease: cognitive and functional concomitants of severe dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 42, 12661272.
Boller, F., Verny, M., Hugonot-Diener, L. and Saxton, J. (2002). Clinical features and assessment of severe dementia. A review1. European Journal of Neurology, 9, 125136.
Chodosh, J. et al. (2008). Nursing home assessment of cognitive impairment: development and testing of a brief instrument of mental status. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56, 20692075.
Corp (2013). Stata statistical software: release 13.
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189198.
Harrell, L. E., Marson, D., Chatterjee, A. and Parrish, J. A. (2000). The severe mini-mental state examination: a new neuropsychologic instrument for the bedside assessment of severely impaired patients with Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 14, 168175.
Latest Facts & Figures Report|Alzheimer's Association. (2016). Latest Facts & Figures Report|Alzheimer's Association. [ONLINE]. Available at: http://www.alz.org/facts/overview.asp; last accessed 15 December 2016.
Sales, M. V., Suemoto, C. K., Nitrini, R., Jacob-Filho, W. and Morillo, L. S. (2012). A useful and brief cognitive assessment for advanced dementia in a population with low levels of education. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 32, 295300.
Saxton, J., McGonigle-Gibson, K. L., Swihart, A. A., Miller, V. J. and Boller, F. (1990). Assessment of the severely impaired patient: description and validation of a new neuropsychological test battery. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 2, 298.
Schmitt, F. A. et al. (1997). The severe impairment battery: concurrent validity and the assessment of longitudinal change in Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 11, 5156.
Schmitt, F. A., Saxton, J., Ferris, S. H., Mackell, J. and Sun, Y. (2013). Evaluation of an 8-item severe impairment battery (SIB-8) vs. the full SIB in moderate to severe Alzheimer's disease patients participating in a donepezil study. International Journal of Clinical Practice, 67, 10501056.
Schmitt, F. A. et al. (2009). A brief instrument to assess treatment response in the patient with advanced Alzheimer disease. Alzheimer Disease & Associated Disorders, 23, 377383.
Wajman, J. R. and Bertolucci, P. H. F. (2006). Comparison between neuropsychological evaluation instruments for severe dementia. Arquivos De Neuro-Psiquiatria, 64, 736740.
Wild, K. V. and Kaye, J. A. (1998). The rate of progression of Alzheimer's disease in the later stages: evidence from the severe impairment battery. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 512516.

Keywords

Clinical evaluation of brief cognitive assessment measures for patients with severe dementia

  • Jasmine S. Dixon (a1), Deborah G. Saddington (a2), Celia J. Shiles (a3), Kavya P. Sreevalsan (a4), Cynthia A. Munro (a1) (a5) and Paul B. Rosenberg (a1)...

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed