Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-nmvwc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-01T20:40:42.520Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are old people so gentle? Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity in the elderly

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2011

Fabia Morales-Vives  and
Andreu Vigil-Colet
Fabia Morales-Vives*
Affiliation:
Research Center for Behavior Assessment, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Tarragona, Spain
Andreu Vigil-Colet
Affiliation:
Research Center for Behavior Assessment, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Department of Psychology, Tarragona, Spain
*
Correspondence should be addressed to: Fabia Morales Vives, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, Departament de Psicologia, Carretera de Valls s/n, 43007 – Tarragona, Spain. Phone: +34 977558086; Fax number: +34 977558088. Email: fabia.morales@urv.cat.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Background: Although old people may seem less impulsive than adults, numerous experimental studies report that they have inhibitory deficits. Bearing in mind that there is a relationship between inhibition processes and impulsivity, age-related inhibition deficits suggest that older people could be more impulsive than adults.

Methods: The aim of the current study was to compare the functional and dysfunctional impulsivity scores obtained in a sample of elderly people (65 years old and above) with those obtained in previous studies on samples of adolescents and adults. Dickman's Impulsivity Inventory was administered to 190 individuals aged between 65 and 94 years without dementia or cognitive impairment.

Results: Results indicated that the elderly sample showed higher dysfunctional impulsivity levels than the adult samples, which is consistent with the inhibition deficits mentioned above. There were no significant differences in functional impulsivity. Furthermore, old women had higher scores than old men on dysfunctional impulsivity.

Conclusions: This study provides evidence of age-related changes in dysfunctional impulsivity. Functional impulsivity did not show the same pattern as dysfunctional impulsivity, being quite stable across the age span. it seems, then, that impulsivity cannot be considered to decrease with age and dysfunctional impulsivity may even increase.

Keywords

agingassessmentinhibition deficitspersonality
Type
Research Article
Information
International Psychogeriatrics , Volume 24 , Issue 3 , March 2012 , pp. 465 - 471
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adan, A., Natale, V., Caci, H. and Prat, G. (2010). Relationship between circadian typology and functional and dysfunctional impulsivity. Chronobiology International, 27, 606–619.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butler, K. and Zacks, R. (2006). Age deficits in the control of prepotent responses: Evidence for an inhibitory decline. Psychology and Aging, 21, 638–643. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.3.638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chico, E., Tous, J. M., Lorenzo-Seva, U. and Vigil-Colet, A. (2003). Spanish adaptation of Dickman's impulsivity inventory, its relationship to Eysenck's personality questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 35, 1883–1892. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(03)00037-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P. and McCrae, , , R. (1988). From catalog to classification: Murray's needs and the five-factor model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55, 258–265. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.55.2.258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, P., Terracciano, A. and McCrae, R. (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322–331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coyne, A., Whitbourne, S. and Glenwick, D. (1978). Adult age differences in reflection-impulsivity. Journal of Gerontology, 33, 402–407.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Deakin, J., Aitken, M., Robbins, T. and Sahakian, B. J. (2004). Risk taking during decision-making in normal volunteers changes with age. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dickman, S. J. (1990). Functional and dysfunctional impulsivity: personality and cognitive correlates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 95–102. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.58.1.95.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eysenck, S. B. G., Pearson, P. R., Easting, G. and Allsopp, J. F. (1985). Age norms for impulsiveness, venturesomeness and empathy in adults. Personality and Individual Differences, 6, 613–619. doi:10.1016/0191-8869(85)90011-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folstein, M., Folstein, S. and McHugh, P. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamm, V. and Hasher, L. (1992). Age and the availability of inferences. Psychology and Aging, 7, 56–64. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.7.1.56.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hasher, L. and Zacks, R. T. (1988). Working memory, comprehension, and aging: a review and a new view. In Bower, G. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (vol. 2, pp. 193–225) San Diego: Academic Press. doi:10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60041-9.Google Scholar
Horn, N. R., Dolan, M., Elliott, R., Deakin, J. F. and Woodruff, P. W. (2003). Response inhibition and impulsivity: an fMRI study. Neuropsychologia, 41, 1959–1966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jorm, A., Christensen, H., Henderson, A., Jacomb, P., Korten, A. and Rodgers, B. (1999). Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 26, 49–58. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(98)00143-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCown, W. G., Johnson, J. L. and Shure, M. B. (1993). The Impulsive Client: Theory, Research, and Treatment. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. doi:10.1037/10500-000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morales-Vives, F. and Vigil-Colet, A. (2010). Are there sex differences in physical aggression in the elderly? Personality and Individual Differences, 49, 659–662. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.05.034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedrero, E. J. (2009). Assessment of functional and dysfunctional impulsivity in substance-addicted patients by means of Dickman's Inventory. Psicothema, 21, 585–591.Google Scholar
Reach, G. (2010). Is there an impatience genotype leading to non-adherence to long-term therapies? Diabetologia, 53, 1562–1567.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, B., Walton, K. and Viechtbauer, W. (2006). Patterns of mean-level change in personality traits across the life course: a meta-analysis of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shah, A. (2007). The relationship between suicide rates and age: an analysis of multinational data from the World Health Organization. International Psychogeriatrics, 19, 1141–1152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and Quasi- Experimental Designs for Generalized Causal Inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
Sutin, A. R. et al. (2010). Cholesterol, triglycerides, and the Five-Factor Model of personality. Biological Psychology, 84, 186–191. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2010.01.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trompetter, H., Scholte, R. and Westerhof, G. (2011). Resident-to-resident relational aggression and subjective well-being in assisted living facilities. Aging and Mental Health, 15, 59–67. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2010.501059.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van den Bree, M. M., Przybeck, T. R. and Cloninger, C. (2006). Diet and personality: associations in a population-based sample. Appetite, 46, 177–188. doi:10.1016/j.appet.2005.12.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A. (2007). Impulsivity and decision-making in the balloon analogue risk-taking task. Personality and Individual Differences, 43, 37–45. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.11.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A. and Codorniu-Raga, M. J. (2004). Aggression and inhibition deficits: the role of functional and dysfunctional impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 37, 1431–1440. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2004.01.013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vigil-Colet, A. and Morales-Vives, F. (2005). How impulsivity is related to intelligence and academic achievement. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 8, 199–204.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vigil-Colet, A., Morales-Vives, F. and Tous, J. (2008). The relationships between functional and dysfunctional impulsivity and aggression across different samples. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 11, 480–487.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
von Hippel, W. and Dunlop, S. (2005). Aging, inhibition, and social inappropriateness. Psychology and Aging, 20, 519–523.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Webster, C. D. and Jackson, M. A. (1997). Impulsivity: Theory, Assessment and Treatment. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Whiteside, S. P. and Lynam, D. R. (2001). The Five Factor Model and impulsivity: using a structural model of personality to understand impulsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 30, 669–689. doi: 10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00064-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar