Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

The structure and validity of self-reported affect in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2011

Rebecca E. Ready
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA
Janessa O. Carvalho
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry and Human Behavior, Brown University Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA
Robert C. Green
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Medicine (Geriatrics Program), Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Department of Epidemiology, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Brandon E. Gavett
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Robert A. Stern
Affiliation:
Department of Neurology, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Background: This study determined the reliability, validity, and factor structure of self-report emotions in persons with mild Alzheimer's disease (AD) and mild cognitive impairment (MCI) relative to controls.

Methods: Participants (mild AD, n = 73; MCI, n = 159; controls, n = 96) rated current emotions with the Visual Analogue Mood Scales (Stern, 1997).

Results: Internal consistency reliabilities were comparable across groups, as were the factor structures of emotion. Persons with AD reported more negative affect (NA) than persons with MCI and controls. The emotion that most differentiated groups was confusion. NA and PA may be more bipolar in persons with AD than for persons with MCI and controls.

Conclusions: The underlying structure of affect was similar in persons with mild AD, MCI, and controls. Further, persons with MCI appeared to be “transitional” between cognitive health and dementia with regard to mood and affect. That is, participants with MCI tended to have affect scores that were intermediate between those with AD and controls. Implications for interventions to improve emotional well-being in AD and MCI are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Aikman, G. G. and Oehlert, M. E. (2001). Geriatric Depression Scale: long form versus short form. Journal of Aging and Mental Health, 22, 6370.Google Scholar
Ashendorf, L., Jefferson, A. L., O'Connor, M. K., Chaisson, C., Green, R. C. and Stern, R. A. (2008). Trail Making Test errors in normal aging, mild cognitive impairment, and dementia. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 23, 129137.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., Whitwell, J. L., Frost, C., Josephs, K. A., Rossor, M. and Fox, N. C. (2006). Measurements of the amygdala and hippocampus in pathologically confirmed Alzheimer disease and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Archives of Neurology, 63, 14341439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beck, C. K. et al. (2002). Effects of behavioral interventions on disruptive behavior and affect in demented nursing home residents. Nursing Research, 51, 219228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brod, M., Stewart, A. L., Sands, L. and Walton, P. (1999). Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life in dementia: the Dementia Quality of Life instrument (DQoL). The Gerontologist, 39, 2535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crawford, J. R. and Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43, 245265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Everett, J. E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 18, 197218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Federal Drug Administration (2006). Guidance for Industry Patient-Reported Outcome Measures: Use in Medical Product Development to Support Labeling Claims. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cder/guidance/5460dft.htm.Google Scholar
Feinstein, J. S., Duff, M. C. and Tranel, D. (2010). Sustained experience of emotion after loss of memory in patients with amnesia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 76747679.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E. and McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatry Research, 12, 189198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heun, R., Kockler, M. and Ptok, U. (2002). Depression in Alzheimer's disease: is there a temporal relationship between onset of depression and onset of dementia? European Psychiatry, 17, 254258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, C. P., Berg, L., Danziger, W. L., Coben, L. A. and Martin, R. L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kolanowski, A., Hoffman, L. and Hofer, S. M. (2007). Concordance of self-report and informant assessment of emotional well-being in nursing home residents with dementia. Journal of Gerontology, 62B, P20P27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kørner, A. et al. (2006). The Geriatric Depression Scale and the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia: a validity study. Nordic Journal of Psychiatry, 60, 360364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kunzmann, U., Little, T. D. and Smith, J. (2000). Is age-related stability of subjective well-being a paradox? Cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence from the Berlin Aging Study. Psychology and Aging, 15, 511526.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M. P. and Brody, E. M. (1969). Assessment of older people: self-maintaining and instrumental activities of daily living. The Gerontologist, 9, 179186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lawton, M. P., Van Haitsma, K. and Klapper, J. (1996). Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer's disease. Journals of Gerontology, 51B, P3P14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logsdon, R. G., Gibbons, L. E., McCurry, S. M. and Teri, L. (2002). Assessing quality of life in older adults with cognitive impairment. Psychosomatic Medicine, 64, 510519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M. F., Katzman, R., Price, D. and Stadlan, E. M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 34, 939944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyer, G. J. and Shack, J. R. (1989). Structural convergence of mood and personality: evidence for old and new directions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 691706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. C. (1993). The clinical dementia rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules. Neurology, 43, 24122414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nyehius, D. L., Stern, R. A., Yamamoto, C., Luchetta, T. and Arruda, J. E. (1997). Standardization and validation of the Visual Analog Mood Scales. The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 11, 407415.Google Scholar
Palmer, K. et al. (2010). Neuropsychiatric predictors of progression from amnestic-mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer's disease: the role of depression and apathy. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 20, 175183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Petersen, R. C. et al. (2009). Mild cognitive impairment: ten years later. Archives of Neurology, 66, 14471455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R. and Grace, J. (2004). Patient versus informant perspectives of quality of life in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer's disease. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 19, 256265.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ready, R. E., Ott, B. R. and Grace, J. (2007). Factor structure of patient and caregiver ratings on the Dementia Quality of Life Instrument. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 14, 144154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rockwood, K., Strang, D., MacKnight, C., Downer, R. and Morris, J. C. (2000). Interrater reliability of the Clinical Dementia Rating in a multicenter trial. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 48, 558559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sands, L. P., Ferreira, P., Stewart, A. L., Brod, M. and Yaffe, K. (2004). What explains differences between dementia patients' and their caregivers' ratings of patient's quality of life? American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 12, 272280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sheikh, J. I. and Yesavage, J. A. (1986). Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. Clinical Gerontologist, 37, 819820.Google Scholar
Stern, R. A. (1997). Visual Analog Mood Scales (VAMS) Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.Google Scholar
Sun, X. et al. (2008). Amyloid-associated depression: a prodromal depression of Alzheimer's disease? Archives of General Psychiatry, 65, 542550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tappen, R. M. and Barry, C. (1995). Assessment of affect in advanced Alzheimer's disease: the Dementia Mood Picture Test. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 21, 4446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Temple, R. O., Stern, R. A., Latham, J., Ruffolo, J. S., Arruda, J. E. and Tremont, G. (2004). Assessment of mood state in dementia by use of the Visual Analog Mood Scales (VAMS). American Journal of Psychiatry, 12, 527530.Google Scholar
Watson, D. and Clark, L. A. (1992). On traits and temperament: general and specific factors of emotional experience and their relations to the five factor model. Journal of Personality, 60, 443476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Watson, D. and Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 219235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Watson, D., Clark, L. A. and Chmielewski, M. (2008). Structures of personality and their relevance to psychopathology. II. Further articulation of a comprehensive unified trait structure. Journal of Personality, 76, 15451586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winblad, B., Palmer, K., Kivipelto, M., Jelic, V. and Fratiglioni, L. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment: beyond controversies, towards a consensus. Report of the International Working Group on Mild Cognitive Impairment. Journal of Internal Medicine, 256, 240246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 25
Total number of PDF views: 76 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 19th January 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Hostname: page-component-76cb886bbf-kdwz2 Total loading time: 0.25 Render date: 2021-01-19T12:31:59.564Z Query parameters: { "hasAccess": "0", "openAccess": "0", "isLogged": "0", "lang": "en" } Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false }

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

The structure and validity of self-reported affect in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

The structure and validity of self-reported affect in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

The structure and validity of self-reported affect in mild cognitive impairment and mild Alzheimer's disease
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *