Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-78dcdb465f-bmnx5 Total loading time: 0.919 Render date: 2021-04-18T16:14:00.834Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": false, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true }

Psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index in community-dwelling older adults

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2010

C. Rodriguez-Blazquez
Affiliation:
National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain Consortium for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBER en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas – CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
B. Frades-Payo
Affiliation:
National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain Consortium for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBER en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas – CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
M. J. Forjaz
Affiliation:
National School of Public Health, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain Consortium for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBER en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas – CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
A. Ayala
Affiliation:
National School of Public Health, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain
P. Martinez-Martin
Affiliation:
National Center for Epidemiology, Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain Consortium for Biomedical Research in Neurodegenerative Diseases (CIBER en Enfermedades Neurodegenerativas – CIBERNED), Carlos III Institute of Health, Madrid, Spain AD Research Unit CIEN Foundation, Carlos III Institute of Health, Alzheimer Center Reina Sofia Foundation, Madrid, Spain
G. Fernandez-Mayoralas
Affiliation:
Institute of Economics, Geography and Demography, Center for Human and Social Sciences, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain
F. Rojo-Perez
Affiliation:
Institute of Economics, Geography and Demography, Center for Human and Social Sciences, Spanish National Research Council, Madrid, Spain
Corresponding
E-mail address:

Abstract

Background: This is the first study to analyze the psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index (IWI), which comprises the Personal Wellbeing Index (PWI) and National Wellbeing Index (NWI), among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods: The IWI was applied to 1106 community-dwelling adults aged 60 years and over. The sample was additionally assessed using scales for comorbidity, disability, mood, general orientation to life, social support, health-related quality of life, and two questions assessing satisfaction with life as a whole and with life in Spain. The PWI and NWI were separately analyzed for acceptability, internal consistency, convergent and discriminative validity, and precision. Linear regression analyses of the PWI and the NWI were also conducted.

Results: Mean scores were 71.0 ± 13.5 for the PWI and 49.5 ± 14.4 for the NWI. No floor or ceiling effects were detected. Cronbach's α was 0.88 for the PWI and 0.92 for the NWI. Factor analysis identified two factors in the IWI, and one factor in the PWI and NWI respectively. The PWI showed a correlation of 0.50 with the “satisfaction with life as a whole” item, and the NWI showed a correlation of 0.73 with the “satisfaction with life in Spain” item. There were significant differences in scores: in the PWI, according to gender, age, social support, education and depression; and in the NWI, according to education and depression. The regression model identified psychosocial, health and functional factors as determinants of the PWI (explained variance: 46.8%).

Conclusions: The IWI displays good acceptability and is a consistent, valid and precise measure of global quality of life in older adults.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Psychogeriatric Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below.

References

Beaton, D. E., Bombardier, C., Katz, J. N. and Wright, J. G. (2001). A taxonomy for responsiveness. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 54, 12041217.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Broadhead, W. E., Gehlbach, S. H., de Gruy, F. V. and Kaplan, B. H. (1988). The Duke-UNC Functional Social Support Questionnaire: measurement of social support in family medicine patients. Medical Care, 26, 709723.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Casas, F., Figuer, C., Gonzalez, M. and Malo, S. (2007). The values adolescents aspire to, their well-being and the values parents aspire to for their children. Social Indicators Research, 84, 271290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z. H. and Davey, G. (2009). Subjective quality of life in Zhuhai City, South China: a public survey using the International Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 91, 243258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummins, R. A., Eckersley, R., Pallant, J., Van Vugt, J. and Misajon, R. (2003). Developing a national index of subjective wellbeing: the Australian Unity Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 64, 159190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, G., Chen, Z., and Lau, A. (2009). Peace in a thatched hut – that is happiness: subjective well-being among peasants in rural China. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10, 239252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong Gierveld, J. and van Tilburg, T. (2006). A 6-item scale for overall, emotional, and social loneliness confirmatory tests on survey data. Research on Aging, 28, 582598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
EuroQol Group (1990). EuroQol – a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy, 16, 199208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glazov, G., Schattner, P., Lopez, D. and Shandley, K. (2009). Laser acupuncture for chronic non-specific low back pain: a controlled clinical trial. Acupuncture in Medicine, 27, 94100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
International Wellbeing Group (2006). Personal Wellbeing Index, 4th edition. Melbourne: Australian Centre on Quality of Life, Deakin University.Google Scholar
Juniper, E. F., Guyatt, G. H. and Jaeschke, R. (1996). How to develop and validate a new health-related quality of life instrument. In Spilker, B. (ed.), Quality of Life and Pharmacoeconomics in Clinical Trials, 2nd edn (pp. 4956). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publisher.Google Scholar
Lau, A. L. D., Cummins, R. A. and McPherson, W. (2005). An investigation into the cross-cultural equivalence of the Personal Wellbeing Index. Social Indicators Research, 72, 403430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, A. L. D., Chi, I., Cummins, R. A., Lee, T. M. C., Chou, K. L. and Chung, L. W. M. (2008). The SARS (Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome) pandemic in Hong Kong: effects on the subjective wellbeing of elderly and younger people. Aging and Mental Health, 12, 746760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawton, M. P. (1997). Measures of quality of life and subjective well-being. Journal of the American Society on Aging, 21, 4547.Google Scholar
Lundberg, O. and Nyström Peck, M. (1995). A simplified way of measuring sense of coherence: experiences from a population survey in Sweden. European Journal of Public Health, 5, 5659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahoney, F. I. and Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 6165.Google ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Martin, P. et al. (2009a). Validation of the Functional Independence Scale. Gaceta Sanitaria, 23, 4954.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martinez-Martin, P. et al. (2009b). International study on the psychometric attributes of the non-motor symptoms scale in Parkinson disease. Neurology, 73, 15841591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McDowell, I. (2006). General health status and quality of life. In McDowell, I. (ed.), Measuring Health: A Guide to Rating Scales and Questionnaires, 3rd edn (pp. 520523). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, M. D. et al. (1992). Rating chronic medical illness burden in geropsychiatric practice and research: application of the Cumulative Illness Rating Scale. Psychiatry Research, 41, 237248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moons, P., Budts, W. and De Geest, S. (2006). Critique on the conceptualisation of quality of life: a review and evaluation of different conceptual approaches. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 43, 891901.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Netuveli, G. and Blane, D. (2008). Quality of life in older ages. British Medical Bulletin, 85, 113126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pfeiffer, E. (1975). A short portable mental status questionnaire for the assessment of organic brain deficit in elderly patients. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 23, 433441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinquart, M. and Sorensen, S. (2001). Gender differences in self-concept and psychological well-being in old age: a meta-analysis. Journals of Gerontology, Series B: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 56, 195213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Renn, D., Pfaffenberger, N., Platter, M., Mitmansgruber, H., Cummins, R. A. and Hofer, S. (2009). International Well-being Index: the Austrian Version. Social Indicators Research, 90, 243256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, G., Driesch, G., Kruse, A., Nehen, H. G., and Heuft, G. (2006). Old and ill and still feeling well? Determinants of subjective well-being in ≥60 year olds: the role of the sense of coherence. American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 14, 850859.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smyth, R., Nielsen, I., and Zhai, Q. G. (2010). Personal well-being in urban China. Social Indicators Research, 95, 231251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terwee, C. B., Dekker, F. W., Wiersinga, W. M., Prummel, M. F. and Bossuyt, P. M. (2003). On assessing responsiveness of health-related quality of life instruments: guidelines for instrument evaluation. Quality of Life Research, 12, 349362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tiliouine, H., Cummins, R., and Davern, M. (2006). Measuring wellbeing in developing countries: the case of Algeria. Social Indicators Research, 75, 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Health Organization (2002). Active Ageing: A Policy Framework. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar
Yiengprugsawan, V., Seubsman, S., Khamman, S., Lim, L., Sleigh, A. and the Thai Cohort Study Team (2009). Personal Wellbeing Index in a national cohort of 87,134 Thai adults. Social Indicators Research. Epublished ahead of print. doi: 10.1007/s11205-009-9542-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigmond, A. S. and Snaith, R. P. (1983). The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361370.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Full text views

Full text views reflects PDF downloads, PDFs sent to Google Drive, Dropbox and Kindle and HTML full text views.

Total number of HTML views: 15
Total number of PDF views: 123 *
View data table for this chart

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between September 2016 - 18th April 2021. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Send article to Kindle

To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index in community-dwelling older adults
Available formats
×

Send article to Dropbox

To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index in community-dwelling older adults
Available formats
×

Send article to Google Drive

To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Psychometric properties of the International Wellbeing Index in community-dwelling older adults
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response


Your details


Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *