Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-19T21:51:29.802Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Placebo effects: a new paradigm and relevance to psychiatry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Daniel McQueen  and
Paul St John Smith
Daniel McQueen
Affiliation:
Royal Free Hampstead NHS Trust, London, UK, email daniel.mcqueen@virgin.net
Paul St John Smith
Affiliation:
Hertfordshire Partnership Foundation Trust, UK, email paulstjohnsmith@hotmail.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Systematic evaluations show that placebo treatments can have large effects, sometimes larger than those of ‘evidence-based treatments’. This is the ‘efficacy paradox’. The neurobiology of placebo effects is being mapped out. Placebo effects are no less real or, in some illnesses, clinically important than the effects of direct biomechanical or pharmacological interventions. The technical model of medicine seeks impersonal technologies that can be applied independently of context and person. This approach has had spectacular success in the treatment of disease but meaning, cultural context, interpersonal effects, personal preferences and values are enormously important in the treatment of illness. The study of placebo reveals aspects of the biology of interpersonal relationships and the social environment. The evidence demonstrates that interpersonal healing (sometimes called placebo) in illness is just as real, scientific and biological as technological healing. This is a paradigm shift.

Type
Guest editorial
Information
International Psychiatry , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 2012 , pp. 1 - 3
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits noncommercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
Copyright © Royal College of Psychiatrists 2012

References

Benedetti, F., Amanzio, M. & Maggi, G. (1995) Potentiation of placebo analgesia by proglumide. Lancet, 346, 1231.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedetti, F., Maggi, G., Lopiano, L., et al (2003) Open versus hidden medical treatments: the patient's knowledge about a therapy affects the therapy outcome. Prevention and Treatment, 6, ArtID 1a (no pagination).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dozier, M., Stovall, K. C. & Albus, K. E. (1999) Attachment and psychopathology in adulthood. In Handbook of Attachment: Theory. Research, and Clinical Applications (eds Cassidy, J. & Shaver, P. R.), pp. 497–519. Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Kaptchuk, T. J., Friedlander, E., Kelley, J. M., et al (2010) Placebos without deception: a randomised controlled trial in irritable bowel syndrome. PLoS ONE, 5(12), e15591.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kinon, B. J., Potts, A. J. & Watson, S. B. (2011) Placebo response in clinical trials with schizophrenia patients. Current Opinion in Psychiatry, 24, 107–113.Google ScholarPubMed
Kirsch, I. & Sapirstein, G. (1998) Listening to Prozac but hearing placebo: a meta-analysis of antidepressant medication. Prevention and Treatment, 1, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirsch, I., Deacon, B. J., Huedo-Medina, T. B., et al (2008) Initial severity and antidepressant benefits: a meta-analysis of data submitted to the Food and Drug Administration. PLoS Medicine, 5(2), e45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidstone, S. C., Schulzer, M., Dinelle, K., et al (2010) Effects of expectation on placebo-induced dopamine release in Parkinson disease. Archives of General Psychiatry, 67, 857–865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKay, K. M., Imel, Z. E. & Wampold, B. E. (2006) Psychiatrist effects in the psychopharmacological treatment of depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 92, 287–290.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meissner, K., Kohls, N. & Colloca, L. (eds) (2011) ‘Placebo effects in medicine: mechanisms and clinical implications’. Theme issue of Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 366, 1781–1930.Google Scholar
Messer, S. B. & Wampold, B. E. (2002) Let's face facts: common factors are more potent than specific therapy ingredients. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 9, 21–25.Google Scholar
Miller, F. G., Colloca, L. & Kaptchuk, T. J. (2009) The placebo effect: illness and interpersonal healing. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 52, 518–539.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.