Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home

Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design

  • Alexander Thompson, Tomer Broude and Yoram Z. Haftel

Abstract

More than 3,000 international investment agreements (IIAs) provide foreign investors with substantive protections in host states and access to binding investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS). In recent years, states increasingly have sought to change their treaty commitments through the practices of renegotiation and termination, so far affecting about 300 IIAs. The received wisdom is that this development reflects a “backlash” against the regime and an attempt by governments to reclaim sovereignty, consistent with broader antiglobalization trends. Using new data on the degree to which IIA provisions restrict state regulatory space (SRS), we provide the first systematic investigation into the effect of ISDS experiences on state decisions to adjust their treaties. The empirical analysis indicates that exposure to investment claims leads either to the renegotiation of IIAs in the direction of greater SRS or to their termination. This effect varies, however, with the nature of involvement in ISDS and with respect to different treaty provisions.

  • View HTML
    • Send article to Kindle

      To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

      Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

      Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

      Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Dropbox

      To send this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

      Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design
      Available formats
      ×

      Send article to Google Drive

      To send this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your <service> account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

      Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design
      Available formats
      ×

Copyright

References

Hide All
Abbott, Kenneth W., and Snidal, Duncan. 2000. Hard and Soft Law in International Governance. International Organization 54 (3):421–56.
Allee, Todd, Elsig, Manfred, and Lugg, Andrew. 2017. Is the European Union Trade Deal with Canada New or Recycled? A Text-as-Data Approach. Global Policy 8 (2):246–52.
Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2010. Delegating Differences: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bargaining Over Dispute Resolution Provisions. International Studies Quarterly 54 (1):126.
Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2011. Contingent Credibility: The Impact of Investment Treaty Violations on Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 65 (3):401–32.
Alschner, Wolfgang, and Skougarevskiy, Dmitriy. 2016. Mapping the Universe of International Investment Agreements. Journal of International Economic Law 19 (3):5688.
Berger, Axel. 2015. Hesitant Embrace: China's Recent Approach to International Investment Rule-Making. Journal of World Trade and Investment 16 (5–6):843–68.
Blake, Daniel J. 2013. Thinking Ahead: Time Horizons and the Legalization of International Investment Agreements. International Organization 67 (4):797827.
Bonnitcha, Jonathan, Skovgaard Poulsen, Lauge N., and Waibel, Michael. 2017. The Political Economy of the Investment Treaty Regime. Oxford University Press.
Broude, Tomer, Haftel, Yoram Z., and Thompson, Alexander. 2017. The Trans-Pacific Partnership and Regulatory Space: A Comparison of Treaty Texts. Journal of International Economic Law 20 (2):391417.
Büthe, Tim, and Milner, Helen V.. 2008. The Politics of Foreign Direct Investment into Developing Countries: Increasing FDI Through International Trade Agreements? American Journal of Political Science 52 (4):741–62.
Cotula, Lorenzo. 2014. Do Investment Treaties Unduly Constrain Regulatory Space? Questions of International Law 1 (9):1931.
Dür, Andreas, Baccini, Leonardo, and Elsig, Manfred. 2014. The Design of International Trade Agreements: Introducing a New Dataset. Review of International Organizations 9 (3):353–75.
Elkins, Zachary, Guzman, Andrew T., and Simmons, Beth A.. 2006. Competing for Capital: The Diffusion of Bilateral Investment Treaties, 1960–2000. International Organization 60 (4):811–46.
Gray, Julia. 2013. The Company States Keep: International Economic Organizations and Investor Perceptions. Cambridge University Press.
Hafner-Burton, Emilie M., Steinert-Threlkeld, Zachary C., and Victor, David G.. 2016. Predictability Versus Flexibility: Secrecy in International Investment Arbitration. World Politics 68 (3):413–53.
Haftel, Yoram Z., and Thompson, Alexander. 2018. When Do States Renegotiate Investment Agreements? The Impact of Arbitration. Review of International Organizations 13 (1):2548.
Hahm, Hyeonho, Osnabrügge, Moritz, French, Elena, and König, Thomas. 2019. Who Settles Disputes? Treaty Design and Trade Attitudes Toward the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP). International Organization 73 (4). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000249>
Henckels, Caroline. 2016. Protecting Regulatory Autonomy Through Greater Precision in Investment Treaties: The TPP, CETA, and TTIP. Journal of International Economic Law 19 (1):2750.
Jandhyala, Srividya, Henisz, Witold J., and Mansfield, Edward W.. 2011. Three Waves of BITs: The Global Diffusion of Foreign Investment Policy. Journal of Conflict Resolution 55 (6):1047–73.
Jupille, Joseph, Mattli, Walter, and Snidal, Duncan. 2013. Institutional Choice and Global Commerce. Cambridge University Press.
Kerner, Andrew. 2009. Why Should I Believe You? The Costs and Consequences of Bilateral Investment Treaties. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1):73102.
Kerner, Andrew, and Pelc, Krzysztof J.. 2018. Do Investor-State Disputes Actually Hurt FDI? Unpublished manuscript. University of Michigan and McGill University.
Koremenos, Barbara. 2016. The Continent of International Law: Explaining Agreement Design. Cambridge University Press.
Langford, Malcolm, and Behn, Daniel. 2018. Managing Backlash: The Evolving Investment Treat Arbitrator? European Journal of International Law 29 (2):551–80.
Lavopa, Federico M., Barreiros, Lucas E., and Bruno, Victoria. 2013. How to Kill a BIT and Not Die Trying: Legal and Political Challenges of Denouncing or Renegotiating Bilateral Investment Treaties. Journal of International Economic Law 16 (4):869–91.
Manger, Mark S., and Peinhardt, Clint. 2017. Learning and the Precision of International Investment Agreements. International Interactions 43 (6):920–40.
Peinhardt, Clint, and Wellhausen, Rachel L.. 2016. Withdrawing from Investment Treaties but Protecting Investment. Global Policy 7 (4):571–76.
Pelc, Krzysztof. 2017. What Explains the Low Success Rate of Investor-State Disputes? International Organization 71 (3):559–83.
Poulsen, Lauge N. Skovgaard. 2015. Bounded Rationality and Economic Diplomacy: The Politics of Investment Treaties in Developing Countries. Cambridge University Press.
Poulsen, Lauge Skovgaard, and Aisbett, Emma. 2013. When the Claim Hits: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bounded Rational Learning. World Politics 65 (2):273313.
Ruggie, John G., ed. 2008. Embedding Global Markets: An Enduring Challenge. Ashgate.
Salacuse, Jeswald. 2015. The Law of Investment Treaties. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.
Scheve, Kenneth A., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2018. How to Save Globalization: Rebuilding America's Ladder of Opportunity. Foreign Affairs 97 (6):98108.
Schultz, Thomas, and Dupont, Cédric. 2014. Investment Arbitration: Promoting the Rule of Law or Over-empowering Investors? A Quantitative Empirical Study. European Journal of International Law 25 (4):1147–68.
Simmons, Beth. 2014. Bargaining Over BITs, Arbitrating Awards: The Regime for Protection and Promotion of International Investment. World Politics 66 (1):1246.
St. John, Taylor. 2018. The Rise of Investor-State Arbitration: Politics, Law, and Unintended Consequences. Oxford University Press.
Trakman, Leon, and Sharma, Kunal. 2014. Why Is Indonesia Terminating Its Bilateral Investment Treaties? East Asian Forum, 20 September. Available at <http://www.eastasiaforum.org/2014/09/20/why-is-indonesia-terminating-its-bilateral-investment-treaties/>.
UNCTAD. 2015. Investment Policy Framework for Sustainable Development. United Nations.
UNCTAD. 2016. World Investment Report. United Nations.
UNCTAD. 2017a. Phase 2 of IIA Reform: Modernizing the Existing Stock of Old-Generation Treaties. IIA Issues Note, Issue 2.
UNCTAD. 2017b. Special Update on Investor-State Dispute Settlement: Facts and Figures. IIA Issues Note, Issue 3.
UNCTAD. 2018. UNCTAD's Reform Package for the International Investment Regime. United Nations.
Voeten, Erik. Forthcoming. Populism and Backlashes Against International Courts. Perspectives on Politics.
Voon, Tania, and Mitchell, Andrew D.. 2016. Denunciation, Termination and Survival: The Interplay of Treaty Law and International Investment Law. ICSID Review 31 (2):413–33.
Waibel, Michael, Kaushal, Asha, Liz Chung, Kyo-Hwa, and Balchin, Clair, eds. 2010. The Backlash Against Investment Arbitration: Perceptions and Reality. Wolters Kluwer.
Wellhausen, Rachel L. 2015. The Shield of Nationality: When Governments Break Contracts with Foreign Firms. Cambridge University Press.
Wellhausen, Rachel L. 2019. International Investment Law and Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 73 (4). <https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818319000225>

Keywords

Type Description Title
PDF
Supplementary materials

Thompson et al. supplementary material
Thompson et al. supplementary material 1

 PDF (658 KB)
658 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Thompson et al. supplementary material
Thompson et al. supplementary material 2

 Unknown (48 KB)
48 KB
UNKNOWN
Supplementary materials

Thompson et al. supplementary material
Thompson et al. supplementary material 3

 Unknown (6 KB)
6 KB

Once Bitten, Twice Shy? Investment Disputes, State Sovereignty, and Change in Treaty Design

  • Alexander Thompson, Tomer Broude and Yoram Z. Haftel

Metrics

Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed