Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T16:43:13.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Edward Miles
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Introduction
Information
International Organization , Volume 31 , Issue 2 , Spring 1977 , pp. 151 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 These events, and those pertaining to the First and Second UN Conferences on the Law of the Sea in 1958 and 1960, are extensively analyzed inMiles, Edward, “Technology, Ocean Management and the Law of the Sea: Some Current History,” Denver Law Journal (Spring 1969): 240–60Google Scholar; Friedheim, Robert, “The Satisfied and Dissatisfied States Negoiate International Law,” World Politics (10 1965): 20–44Google Scholar; and Alexander, Lewis ed., The Law of the Sea, (Columbus: The Ohio State University Press, 1967Google Scholar).

2 Miles, Edward, “An interpretation of the Caracas Proceedings,” paper presented to the Ninth Annual Meeting of the Law of the Sea Institute, Miami, Florida, 01 6–9, 1975, pp. 66–68Google Scholar.

3 Knauss, John, “Marine Science and the 1974 Law of the Sea Conference,” Science Vol. 184, No. 4144, (06 28, 1974): 1335–1341CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

4 I am deeply indebted to my colleagues on the Board of Editors of International Organization for stimulating suggestions on the analytical approach adopted here.