Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-skm99 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-26T21:40:06.064Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Intergovernmentalism in the European Communities in the 1970s: patterns and perspectives

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Paul Taylor
Get access

Extract

The direction of movement of integration between the member states of the European Communities was uncertain in the early 1970s. The increasingly intergovernmental style of decision making was then seen to have a potential for furthering integration, although a number of disintegrative pressures were noted. In 1973–1974, however, the teleological ambiguities were resolved, and in the late 1970s member states increasingly stressed autonomy rather than integration. Intergovernmental decision making then acquired a different character from that which it had shown in the early seventies. A shift in the center of gravity of the Communities' institutions, away from the Commission and in favor of the Presidency and the national foreign ministers and officials, both reflected and encouraged these developments.

Type
Articles
Information
International Organization , Volume 36 , Issue 4 , Autumn 1982 , pp. 741 - 766
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See Puchala, Donald, “Of Blind Men, Elephants and International Integration,” Journal of Common Market Studies 10, 3 (03 1972)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 For an exploration of the theme of intergovernmentalism, see Webb, Carole, “Introduction: Variations on a Theoretical Theme,” in Wallace, Helen, Wallace, William, and Webb, , Policy Making in the European Communities (London: John Wiley, 1977), especially pp. 17–22Google Scholar.

3 For an account of the evolution of the Presidency see Edwards, Geoffrey and Wallace, Helen, The Council of Ministers of the European Community and the President in Office (London: Federal Trust for Education and Research, 1977)Google Scholar.

4 See European Union, Report by Leo Tindemans to the European Council, Bulletin of the European Communities Supplement 1 (Brussels, 1976), pp.14–19Google Scholar. For a consideration of the distribution of support for political union, see Taylor, Phillip, When Europe Speaks with One Voice (London: Aldwych Press, 1979)Google Scholar.

5 For an account of the development of the political cooperation machinery, see Wallace, William and Allen, David, “Political Co-operation: Procedure as a Substitute for Policy,” in Wallace, , Wallace, , and Webb, , Policy Making, pp. 227–46Google Scholar.

6 Dahrendorf, Ralf, “Wieland Europa,” Die Zeit, 9 and 10 07 1972Google Scholar, and Plädoyer für die Europaische Union (Munich: Piper Verlag, 1973)Google Scholar.

7 Spinelli, Altiero, The European Adventure (London: Charles Knight, 1972), p. 20Google Scholar.

8 Ibid., p. 20.

9 Ibid., p. 21.

10 Ibid., pp. 21–22.

11 Hallstein, Walter, Europe in the Making (London: Allen & Unwin, 1972), p. 145Google Scholar.

12 See Russell, Robert W., “Snakes and Sheiks: Managing Europe's Money,” in Wallace, , Wallace, , and Webb, , Policy Making, pp. 29–89Google Scholar.

13 Paris Summit, Final Communiqué, Sixth General Report on the Activities of the Communities (Brussels and Luxembourg, 1973), para. 1Google Scholar.

14 Taylor, Paul, “The Politics of the European Communities: The Confederal Phase,” World Politics 27 (04 1975), esp. pp. 348–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See Barattieri, V. and Thomas, Anthony, “EEC Monetary and Economic Cooperation,” International Affairs (10 1975), pp. 499–517Google Scholar.

16 See Heath, Edward, Old World, New Horizons: Britain, the Common Market and the Atlantic Alliance, The Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Quoted in Morgan, Annette, From Summit to Council: Evolution in the EEC (London: Chatham House, P.E.P., 06 1976), pp. 15–18Google Scholar.

18 Le Monde, 11 September 1965, quoted in Lindberg, Leon N., “Integration as a Source of Stress on the European Community System,” International Organization (Spring 1966), pp. 233–65Google Scholar.

19 Quoted in Morgan, , From Summit to Council, p. 18Google Scholar.

20 Bulletin of the European Communities (1973), p. 13.

21 “Declaration issued at the end of the Conference … by the President of the Conference, Mr. Anke Jørgensen Danish Prime Minister,” quoted in Seventh General Report on the Activities of the Communities (Brussels and Luxembourg, 1974), p. 487Google Scholar.

22 Quoted in Morgan, , From Summit to Council, p. 15Google Scholar.

23 Bulletin of the European Communities 1 (1970), p. 52Google Scholar.

24 See Taylor, , “Politics of the European Communities,” p. 350Google Scholar.

25 See President Ortoli's Introduction to the Sixth General Report on the Activities of the Communities, p. 4Google Scholar.

26 See Dashwood, Alan, “Hastening Slowly: the Communities' Path towards Harmonization,” in Wallace, , Wallace, , and Webb, , Policy Making, pp. 290–91Google Scholar.

27 “Meeting of the Heads of Government of the Community, Paris, 9–10 December, 1974, Communiqué,” quoted in Eighth General Report on the Activities of the Communities (Brussels and Luxembourg, 1974), pp. 297–304Google Scholar.

28 Noëel, Emile, “Some Reflections on the Preparations, Development and Repercussions of the Meetings between Heads of Government (1974–1975),” Government and Opposition 2, 1 (Winter 1976), p. 20CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 Wallace, and Allen, , “Political Co-operation,” pp. 239–41Google Scholar.

30 For an examination of De Gaulle's intention in introducing “Political Union” see Bodenheimer, Susanne J., “The ‘Political Union’ Debate in Europe”, International Organization 21, 1 (Winter 1967), pp. 24–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

31 See Sasse, Christoph, Regierungen, Parlamente, Ministerrat: Entscheidunge-prozesse inder Europaische Gemeinschaft (Bonn: Europa Union Verlag, 1975), pp. 31–39Google Scholar.

32 See Morgan, Roger, West Germany's Foreign Policy Agenda (Beverly Hills, Cal.: Sage for the Center for Strategic and International Studies, 1978), especially pp. 48–52Google Scholar.

33 See Beloff, Nora, “Harold's Handy Fig Leaf,” Observer (London), 2 03 1975, p. 4Google Scholar.

34 Wallace, Helen, Budgetary Politics: The Finances of the European Communities (London: Allen & Unwin for the University Association for Contemporary European Studies, 1980), p. 60Google Scholar.

35 For a discussion of Britain's increasing insistence upon “fair national shares” see Denton, Geoffrey, “Reflections on Fiscal Federalism in the EEC,” Journal of Common Market Studies 16, 4 (06 1978), pp. 283–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

36 Wallace, and Allen, , “Political Co-operation,” p. 239Google Scholar.

37 Edwards, and Wallace, , Council of Ministers, p. 35Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., p. 36.

39 Lodge, Juliet, 9“Towards the European Political Community: EEC Summits and European Integration,” Orbis 19 (Summer 1975), p. 646Google Scholar.

40 Economist, 14 December 1974, p. 11.

41 See Commission of the European Communities, Thirteenth General Report on the Activities of the Communities (Brussels, 02 1980), p. 280Google Scholar.

42 An article in the Financial Times, 17 January 1981, by Robert Mauthner reported that Gaston Thorn, new President of the Commission, would not take France to the European Court for its refusal to pay its share of an increase in the Budget pushed through by the Assembly. West Germany and Belgium had also refused to pay their share of the Budget. In February 1981 it was reported that the Commission would indeed bring all three before the Court.

43 See Hornsby, Michael, Times (London), 27 02 1980Google Scholar. The British government was reported to be considering the possibility of illegally withholding its VAT contributions to the Communities' budget if its partners would not conclude a satisfactory deal.

44 See Financial Times, 17 March 1980. The French Cabinet had warned the British that they would refuse to discuss the subject of the reduction of Britain's budgetary contribution unless other subjects were also linked and discussed, in particular a Community regime for sheep meat.

45 I am grateful for this point to Robert Jackson, M.E.P., made at a seminar at Oxford University, 21 November 1980.

46 See Hodges, Michael and Wallace, William, Economic Divergence in the European Community (London: Allen & Unwin, 1981)Google Scholar.

47 Dahrendorf, Plädoyer.

48 Times, 3 February 1981.

49 Hodges and Wallace, Economic Divergence.

50 For a discussion of current problems in the Communities' industrial policy see Tsoukalis, Loukas and Ferreira, António da Silva, “Management of Industrial Surplus Capacity in the European Community,” International Organization 34, 3 (Summer 1980), pp. 355–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

51 See Coombes, David with Wiebecke, Ilka, The Power of the Purse in the European Communities (London: Chatham House, P.E.P., 1972)Google Scholar.

52 See Noël, Emile, How the European Community's Institutions Work, Community Topics nos. 11 (1963), 27 (1966), 32 (1969) and 39 (no date) (Brussels: European Community Information Service)Google Scholar.

53 See Bulletin of the European Communities 9 (1979), p. 19Google Scholar.

54 Wallace, Helen S., “The Impact of the Communities on National Policy-Making,” Government and Opposition 6, 4 (Autumn 1971), p. 528CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Committee of Three, Report on the European Institutions, presented to the European Council, 10 1979 (n.p.), p. 9Google Scholar.

56 See Hornsby, Michael, “Four Years as the Man in the Middle,” Times, 31 12 1980Google Scholar.

57 In 1980 a film starring Peter Sellers dealt with the advantages of simply “being there,” (i.e., in the right place at the right time) in acquiring power and status over those of having ability, capacity, and even mature judgment!

58 The heads of government considered that it was “necessary to renounce the practice which consisted of making agreement on all questions conditional on the unanimous consent of the Member States. …” Communiqué of the Meeting of Heads of Government of the Community, Paris, 9–10 12 1974Google Scholar.

59 The “logic of diversity” argument was developed by Hoffmann, Stanley in his article “The Fate of the Nation State,” Daedalus, Summer 1966, especially p. 864Google Scholar.