Skip to main content Accessibility help

Foreign Meddling and Mass Attitudes Toward International Economic Engagement

  • Sarah Sunn Bush and Lauren Prather


What explains variation in individual preferences for foreign economic engagement? Although a large and growing literature addresses that question, little research examines how partner countries affect public opinion on policies such as trade, foreign aid, and investment. We construct a new theory arguing that political side-taking by outside powers shapes individuals’ support for engaging economically with those countries. We test the theory using original surveys in the United States and Tunisia. In both cases, the potential partner country's side-taking in the partisan politics of the respondents’ country dramatically shapes support for foreign economic relations. As the rise of new aid donors, investors, and trade partners creates new choices in economic partners, our theory and findings are critical to understanding mass preferences about open economic engagement.



Hide All
Bechtel, Michael M., Hainmueller, Jens, and Margalit, Yotam. 2014. Preferences for International Redistribution: The Divide over the Eurozone Bailouts. American Journal of Political Science 58 (4):835–56.
Brooks, Sarah M., Cunha, Raphael, and Mosley, Layna. 2015. Categories, Creditworthiness, and Contagion: How Investors’ Shortcuts Affect Sovereign Debt Markets. International Studies Quarterly 59 (3):587601.
Bubeck, Johannes, and Marinov, Nikolay. 2017. Process or Candidate: The International Community and the Demand for Electoral Integrity. American Political Science Review 111 (3):535–54.
Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce, and Smith, Alastair. 2009. A Political Economy of Aid. International Organization 63 (2):309–40.
Bush, Sarah Sunn. 2015. The Taming of Democracy Assistance: Why Democracy Promotion Does Not Confront Dictators. Cambridge University Press.
Bush, Sarah Sunn, and Prather, Lauren. 2018. Who's There? Election Observer Identity and the Local Credibility of Elections. International Organization 72 (3):659–92.
Carnegie, Allison. 2015. Power Plays: How International Institutions Reshape Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge University Press.
Corstange, Daniel, and Marinov, Nikolay. 2012. Taking Sides in Other People's Elections: The Polarizing Effect of Foreign Intervention. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):655–70.
Faye, Michael, and Niehaus, Paul. 2012. Political Aid Cycles. The American Economic Review 102 (7):3516–30.
Findley, Michael G., Harris, Adam S., Milner, Helen V., and Nielson, Daniel. 2017. Who Controls Foreign Aid? Elite Versus Public Perceptions of Donor Influence in Aid-Dependent Uganda. International Organization 71 (4):633–63.
Gowa, Joanne, and Mansfield, Edward D.. 1993. Power Politics and International Trade. American Political Science Review 87 (2):408–20.
Gray, Julia, and Hicks, Raymond P.. 2014. Reputations, Perceptions, and International Economic Agreements. International Interactions 40 (3):325–49.
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2009. Determining Trade Policy: Do Voters Hold Politicians Accountable? International Organization 63 (3):533–57.
Guisinger, Alexandra. 2017. American Opinion on Trade: Preferences without Politics. Oxford University Press.
Hays, Jude C., Ehrlich, Sean D., and Peinhardt, Clint. 2005. Government Spending and Public Support for Trade in the OECD: An Empirical Test of the Embedded Liberalism Thesis. International Organization 59 (2):473–94.
Jablonski, Ryan. 2014. How Aid Targets Votes: The Impact of Electoral Incentives on Foreign Aid Distribution. World Politics 66 (2):293330.
Jacobs, Lawrence R., and Page, Benjamin I.. 2005. Who Influences US Foreign Policy? American Political Science Review 99 (1):107–23.
Jamal, Amaney A. 2012. Of Empires and Citizens: Pro-American Democracy or No Democracy at All? Princeton University Press.
Levin, Dov. 2016. When the Great Power Gets a Vote: The Effects of Great Power Electoral Interventions on Election Results. International Studies Quarterly 60 (2):189202.
Li, Xiaojun, and Zeng, Ka. 2017. Individual Preferences for FDI in Developing Countries: Experimental Evidence from China. Journal of Experimental Political Science 4 (3):195205.
, Xiaobo, Scheve, Kenneth, and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2012. Inequity Aversion and the International Distribution of Trade Protection. American Journal of Political Science 56 (3):638–54.
Mansfield, Edward D., and Mutz, Diana C.. 2009. Support for Free Trade: Self-interest, Sociotropic Politics, and Out-Group Anxiety. International Organization 63 (3):425–57.
Mayda, Anna Maria, and Rodrik, Dani. 2005. Why Are Some People (and Countries) More Protectionist Than Others? European Economic Review 49 (6):1393–430.
Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin. 2013. Public Opinion and Foreign Aid: A Review Essay. International Interactions 39 (3):389401.
Milner, Helen V., and Tingley, Dustin H.. 2010. The Political Economy of US Foreign Aid: American Legislators and the Domestic Politics of Aid. Economics and Politics 22 (2):200–32.
O'Rourke, Kevin H., and Sinnott, Richard. 2001. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence. In Brookings Trade Forum, 157–206.
Owen, Erica, and Johnston, Noel P.. 2017. Occupation and the Political Economy of Trade: Job Routineness, Offshorability, and Protectionist Sentiment. International Organization 71 (4):665–99.
Pandya, Sonal S. 2010. Labor Markets and the Demand for Foreign Direct Investment. International Organization 64 (3):389409.
Peters, Anne Mariel, and Moore, Pete W.. 2009. Beyond Boom and Bust: External Rents, Durable Authoritarianism, and Institutional Adaptation in the Hasehmite Kingdom of Jordan. Studies in Comparative International Development 44 (3):256–85.
Pinto, Pablo M., and Pinto, Santiago M.. 2008. The Politics of Investment Partisanship: And the Sectoral Allocation of Foreign Direct Investment. Economics and Politics 20 (2):216–54.
Scheve, Kenneth F., and Slaughter, Matthew J.. 2001. What Determines Individual Trade-Policy Preferences? Journal of International Economics 54 (2):267–92.
Seawright, Jason, and Gerring, John. 2008. Case Selection Techniques in Case Study Research. Political Research Quarterly 61 (2):294308.
Spilker, Gabriele, Bernauer, Thomas, and Umaña, Víctor. 2016. Selecting Partner Countries for Preferential Trade Agreements: Experimental Evidence from Costa Rica, Nicaragua, and Vietnam. International Studies Quarterly 60 (4):706–18.


Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Bush and Prather Supplementary Materials
Bush and Prather Supplementary Materials

 PDF (285 KB)
285 KB

Foreign Meddling and Mass Attitudes Toward International Economic Engagement

  • Sarah Sunn Bush and Lauren Prather


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.