Skip to main content Accessibility help

Deciding to Defer: The Importance of Fairness in Resolving Transnational Jurisdictional Conflicts

  • Asif Efrat and Abraham L. Newman


The cross-border movement of people, goods, and information frequently results in legal disputes that come under the jurisdiction of multiple states. The principle of deference—acceptance of another state's exercise of legal authority—is one mechanism to manage such jurisdictional conflicts. Despite the importance of deference in international law and cooperation, little is known about the causes of variation in its use. In this article, we develop a theory of deference that focuses on the role that domestic institutions and norms play in ensuring procedural and substantive fairness. We test this theory in an original data set concerning accession practices in the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. Our findings offer considerable support for the idea that states evaluate partners on the likelihood that they can offer a fair legal process. Exploring empirically the efforts against parental child abduction, we offer a nuanced account of the link between domestic institutions and norms and international cooperation. This account suggests that greater attention should be paid to the use of deference as a mechanism to manage the conflicts posed by globalization.



Hide All
Albin, Cecilia. 2001. Justice and Fairness in International Negotiation. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Allee, Todd, and Peinhardt, Clint. 2010. Delegating Differences: Bilateral Investment Treaties and Bargaining over Dispute Resolution Provisions. International Studies Quarterly 54 (1):126.
Amurgo-Pacheco, Alberto. 2007. Mutual Recognition Agreements and Trade Diversion: Consequences for Developing Nations. HEI Working Paper 20/2006. Geneva: Graduate Institute of International Studies.
Anton, A.E. 1981. The Hague Convention on International Child Abduction. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 30 (3):537–67.
Association of the Bar of the City of New York. Committee on Foreign and Comparative Law. 2001. Survey on Foreign Recognition of US Money Judgments. The Record 56 (3):378411.
Bach, David, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2010a. Transnational Networks and Domestic Policy Convergence: Evidence from Insider Trading Regulation. International Organization 64 (3):505–28.
Bach, David, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2010b. Governing Lipstick and Lipitor: Capacity, Sequencing, and Power in International Pharmaceuticals and Cosmetics Regulation. Review of International Political Economy 17 (4):665–95.
Bailey, Michael, Strezhnev, Anton, and Voeten, Erik. 2015. Estimating Dynamic State Preferences from United Nations Voting Data. Journal of Conflict Resolution. Available at <>. Accessed 22 January 2016.
Barbour, Emily C. 2010. The SPEECH Act: The Federal Response to “Libel Tourism.” CRS Report R41417. Washington, DC: Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service.
Bassiouni, Cherif M. 2014. International Extradition: United States Law and Practice. 6th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bättig, Michèle B., and Bernauer, Thomas. 2009. National Institutions and Global Public Goods: Are Democracies More Cooperative in Climate Change Policy? International Organization 63 (2):281308.
Berman, Paul Schiff. 2002. The Globalization of Jurisdiction. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 151 (2):311545.
Blader, Steven L. 2007. What Determines People's Fairness Judgments? Identification and Outcomes Influence Procedural Justice Evaluations Under Uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 43 (6):986–94.
Bliesener, Dirk. 1994. Fairness and Choice of Law: A Critique of the Political Rights-Based Approach to the Conflict of Laws. American Journal of Comparative Law 42 (4):687710.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Jones, Bradford S.. 2004. Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., Reiter, Dan, and Zorn, Christopher. 2003. Nonproportional Hazards and Event History Analysis in International Relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (1):3353.
Brilmayer, Lea. 1989. Rights, Fairness, and Choice of Law. Yale Law Journal 98 (7):1277–319.
Bruch, Carol S. 2000. Religious Law, Secular Practices, and Children's Human Rights in Child Abduction Cases Under the Hague Child Abduction Convention. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 33 (1):4958.
Busch, Marc L. 2007. Overlapping Institutions, Forum Shopping, and Dispute Settlement in International Trade. International Organization 61 (4):735–61.
Buxbaum, Hannah L. 2001. Conflict of Economic Laws: From Sovereignty to Substance. Virginia Journal of International Law 42 (4):931–77.
Cao, Xun. 2012. Global Networks and Domestic Policy Convergence: A Network Explanation of Policy Changes. World Politics 64 (3):375425.
Cingranelli, David L., Richards, David L., and Clay, K. Chad. 2014. The CIRI Human Rights Dataset. Available at <>. Accessed 22 December 2015.
Commission of the European Communities. 2004. Priorities for Bilateral/Regional Trade Related Activities in the Field of Mutual Recognition Agreements for Industrial Products and Related Technical Dialogue. Working Paper SEC(2004)1072. Brussels: European Commission.
Cremer, De, David, Lieven Brebels, and Sedikides, Constantine. 2008. Being Uncertain About What? Procedural Fairness Effects as a Function of General Uncertainty and Belongingness Uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 44 (6):1520–25.
Dodge, William S. 2015. International Comity in American Law. Columbia Law Review 115 (8):2071–142.
Drezner, Daniel W. 2007. All Politics Is Global: Explaining International Regulatory Regimes. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Duncan, William. 2000. Action in the Support of the Hague Child Abduction Convention: A View from the Permanent Bureau. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 33 (1):103–23.
Dunoff, Jeffrey L., and Pollack, Mark A., eds. 2012. Interdisciplinary Perspectives on International Law and International Relations: The State of the Art. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Eroglu, Muzaffer. 2008. Multinational Enterprises and Tort Liabilities: An Interdisciplinary and Comparative Examination. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
Farrell, Henry, and Newman, Abraham L.. 2014. Domestic Institutions Beyond the Nation-State: Charting the New Interdependence Approach. World Politics 66 (2):331–63.
Fearon, James D. 1998. Bargaining, Enforcement, and International Cooperation. International Organization 52 (2):269305.
Freeman, Marilyn. 1998. The Effects and Consequences of International Child Abduction. Family Law Quarterly 32 (3):603–21.
Gerhart, Peter M., and Baron, Michael S.. 2003. Understanding National Treatment: The Participatory Vision of the WTO. Indiana International and Comparative Law Review 14 (3):505–52.
Greif, Geoffrey L. 2009. The Long-term Aftermath of Child Abduction: Two Case Studies and Implications for Family Therapy. American Journal of Family Therapy 37 (4):273–86.
Greif, Geoffrey L., and Hegar, Rebecca L.. 1991. Parents Whose Children Are Abducted by the Other Parent: Implications for Treatment. American Journal of Family Therapy 19 (3):215–25.
Kaczmarek, Sara, and Newman, Abraham. 2011. The Long Arm of the Law: Extraterritoriality and the National Implementation of Foreign Bribery Legislation. International Organization 65 (4):745–70.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Tversky, Amos. 1979. Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision Under Risk. Econometrica 47 (2):263–91.
Kelley, Judith. 2007. Who Keeps International Commitments and Why? The International Criminal Court and Bilateral Nonsurrender Agreements. American Political Science Review 101 (3):573–89.
Lai, Brian, and Reiter, Dan. 2000. Democracy, Political Similarity, and International Alliances, 1816–1992. Journal of Conflict Resolution 44 (2):203–27.
Porta, La, Rafael, Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, and Shleifer, Andrei. 2008. The Economic Consequences of Legal Origins. Journal of Economic Literature 46 (2):285332.
Lavenex, Sandra. 2007. Mutual Recognition and the Monopoly of Force: Limits of the Single Market Analogy. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (5):762–79.
Leeds, Brett Ashley. 1999. Domestic Political Institutions, Credible Commitments, and International Cooperation. American Journal of Political Science 43 (4):9791002.
Leeds, Brett Ashley, Mattes, Michaela, and Vogel, Jeremy S.. 2009. Interests, Institutions, and the Reliability of International Commitments. American Journal of Political Science 53 (2):461–76.
Levy, Jack S. 2003. Applications of Prospect Theory to Political Science. Synthese 135 (2):215–41.
Lindhorst, Tarin, and Edelson, Jeffrey L.. 2012. Battered Women, Their Children, and International Law: The Unintended Consequences of the Hague Child Abduction Convention. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
Lowe, Nigel. 2011. A Statistical Analysis of Applications Made in 2008 Under the Hague Convention of 25 October 1980 on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Part I—Global Report. Preliminary Document 8A. The Hague, Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law.
Lutz, Robert E. 2007. A Lawyer's Handbook for Enforcing Foreign Judgments in the United States and Abroad. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Magnuson, William. 2012. The Domestic Politics of International Extradition. Virginia Journal of International Law 52 (4):839901.
Mansfield, Edward, Milner, Helen V., and Rosendorff, B. Peter. 2002. Why Democracies Cooperate More: Electoral Control and International Trade Agreements. International Organization 56 (3):477513.
Maoz, Zeev, and Henderson, Errol A.. 2013. The World Religion Dataset, 1945–2010: Logic, Estimates, and Trends. International Interactions 39 (3):265–91.
Martin, Lisa. 2000. Democratic Commitments: Legislatures and International Cooperation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Mattli, Walter. 2001. Private Justice in a Global Economy: From Litigation to Arbitration. International Organization 55 (4):919–47.
Mattli, Walter, and Woods, Ngaire, eds. 2009. The Politics of Global Regulation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Michaels, Ralf. 2009. Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Judgments. In Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law, Vol. 8, edited by Wolfrum, Rüdiger, 113. New York: Oxford University Press.
Mirabella, Julia Grace. 2012. Scales of Justice: Assessing Italian Criminal Procedure Through the Amanda Knox Trial. Boston University International Law Journal 30 (1):229–69.
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Powell, Emilia Justyna. 2011. Domestic Law Goes Global: Legal Traditions and International Courts. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Newman, Abraham L. 2008. Protectors of Privacy: Regulating Personal Data in the Global Economy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Nicolaidis, Kalypso, and Egan, Michelle. 2001. Transnational Market Governance and Regional Policy Externality: Why Recognize Foreign Standards. Journal of European Public Policy 8 (3):454–73.
Nicolaidis, Kalypso, and Shaffer, Gregory. 2005. Transnational Mutual Recognition Regimes: Governance without Global Government. Law and Contemporary Problems 68 (3/4):263317.
North, P.M. 1979. The Draft UK/US. Judgments Convention: A British Viewpoint. Northwestern Journal of International Law and Business 1 (1):219–39.
Pérez-Vera, Elisa. 1981. Explanatory Report on the 1980 Hague Child Abduction Convention. The Hague, Netherlands: Hague Conference on Private International Law. Available at <>. Accessed 27 September 2015.
Pollack, Mark A., and Shaffer, Gregory C.. 2009. When Cooperation Fails: The International Law and Politics of Genetically Modified Foods. New York: Oxford University Press.
Posner, Eric A., and Sunstein, Cass R.. 2007. Chevronizing Foreign Relations Law. Yale Law Journal 116 (6):1170–228.
Powell, Emilia Justyna, and Staton, Jeffrey K.. 2009. Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation. International Studies Quarterly 53 (1):149–74.
Putnam, Robert D. 1988. Diplomacy and Domestic Politics: The Logic of Two-level Games. International Organization 42 (3):427–60.
Putnam, Tonya L. 2009. Courts Without Borders: Domestic Sources of US Extraterritoriality in the Regulatory Sphere. International Organization 63 (3):459–90.
Raustiala, Kal. 2009. Does the Constitution Follow the Flag? The Evolution of Territoriality in American Law. New York: Oxford University Press.
Raustiala, Kal, and Victor, David G.. 2004. The Regime Complex for Plant Genetic Resources. International Organization 58 (2):277309.
Schmidt, Susanne K. 2007. Mutual Recognition as a New Mode of Governance. Journal of European Public Policy 14 (5):667–81.
Schnitzer-Reese, Ericka A. 2004. International Child Abduction to Non-Hague Convention Countries: The Need for an International Family Court. Northwestern Journal of International Human Rights 2 (1):Article 7.
Sell, Susan K. 2003. Private Power, Public Law: The Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Shaffer, Gregory. 2002. Reconciling Trade and Regulatory Goals: The Prospects and Limits of New Approaches to Transatlantic Governance Through Mutual Recognition and Safe Harbor Agreements. Columbia Journal of European Law 9 (1):2977.
Silberman, Linda. 2000. Hague Child Abduction Convention Turns Twenty: Gender Politics and Other Issues. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics 33 (1):221–50.
Silberman, Linda. 2002. Comparative Jurisdiction in the International Context: Will the Proposed Hague Judgments Convention Be Stalled? DePaul Law Review 52 (2):319–50.
Silberman, Linda. 2014. United States Supreme Court Hague Abduction Decisions: Developing a Global Jurisprudence. Journal of Comparative Law 9 (1):4965.
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights: International Law in Domestic Politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Simmons, Beth A., and Danner, Allison. 2010. Credible Commitments and the International Criminal Court. International Organization 64 (2):225–56.
Singer, David. 2007. Regulating Capital: Setting Standards for the International Financial System. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Slaughter, Anne-Marie. 2003. A Global Community of Courts. Harvard International Law Journal 44 (1):191219.
Spilman, Sarah K. 2006. Child Abduction, Parents’ Distress, and Social Support. Violence and Victims 21 (2):149–65.
Staton, Jeffrey K., and Moore, Will H.. 2011. Judicial Power in Domestic and International Politics. International Organization 65 (3):553–87.
Stephens, Beth, Chomsky, Judith, Green, Jennifer, Hoffman, Paul, and Ratner, Michael, eds. 2008. International Human Rights Litigation in US Courts. 2nd ed. Boston: Martinus Nijhoff.
Tafara, Ethiopis, and Peterson, Robert. 2007. A Blueprint for Cross-Border Access to US Investors: A New International Framework. Harvard International Law Journal 48 (1):3168.
Verdier, Pierre-Hughes. 2011. Mutual Recognition in International Finance. Harvard International Law Journal 55 (1):56107.
US Department of State. 2008. Report on Compliance with the Hague Convention on the Civil Aspects of International Child Abduction. Washington, DC.
Vesneski, William M., Lindhorst, Taryn, and Edelson, Jeffrey L.. 2011. US Judicial Implementation of the Hague Convention in Cases Alleging Domestic Violence. Juvenile and Family Court Journal 62 (2):121.
Wallace, Geoffrey P.R. 2013. International Law and Public Attitudes Toward Torture: An Experimental Study. International Organization 67 (1):105–40.
Wangnerud, Lena. 2009. Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science 12:5169.
Whytock, Christopher A. 2009. Domestic Courts and Global Governance. Tulane Law Review 84 (1):67123.
Whytock, Christopher A., and Robertson, Cassandra Burke. 2011. Forum Non Conveniens and the Enforcement of Foreign Judgments. Columbia Law Review 111 (7):1444–521.
Wurmnest, Wolfgang. 2005. Recognition and Enforcement of US Money Judgments in Germany. Berkeley Journal of International Law 23 (1):175200.

Related content

Powered by UNSILO
Type Description Title
Supplementary materials

Efrat and Newman supplementary material S1
Efrat and Newman supplementary material

 Unknown (4 KB)
4 KB
Supplementary materials

Efrat and Newman supplementary material S2
Efrat and Newman supplementary material

 Unknown (22.3 MB)
22.3 MB

Deciding to Defer: The Importance of Fairness in Resolving Transnational Jurisdictional Conflicts

  • Asif Efrat and Abraham L. Newman


Altmetric attention score

Full text views

Total number of HTML views: 0
Total number of PDF views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

Abstract views

Total abstract views: 0 *
Loading metrics...

* Views captured on Cambridge Core between <date>. This data will be updated every 24 hours.

Usage data cannot currently be displayed.