Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T21:53:39.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Breaking with orthodoxy: the politics of economic policy responses to the Depression of the 1930s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 May 2009

Peter Alexis Gourevitch
Peter Alexis Gourevitch
Affiliation:
Peter Alexis Gourevitch is Professor of Political Science at theUniversity of California, San Diego.
Get access

Extract

Under the same systemic shock, the collapse of the international economy in 1929, different countries formulated different policy responses. Britain, Germany, the United States, France, and Sweden all began by attempting the orthodoxy of deflation. Soon after, they abandoned deflation, devalued their currencies, erected tariff barriers, and set up corporatistic production and marketing arrangements. A few countries went further, and began experimenting with demand-stimulus fiscal policy. The most successful was Nazi Germany; the Swedish and U.S. efforts were much more limited and less effective, the French attempt crumbled in less than a year, and Britain never tried demand stimulus. Why this divergence in policy? The politics of policy response, the societal basis of different policy coalitions and the way in which they were expressed through different political formulations, suggests an answer. In all countries, labor, agriculture, and certain elements of business became available for revolts against policy orthodoxy. What differed across countries was the specific balance of forces among these interest groups, and the political factors that shaped their combinations. The effect of political leadership, institutions, and other variables on outcomes depended critically on the way specific social forces in each society used and worked through them.

Type
Political Consequences of Industrial Change
Information
International Organization , Volume 38 , Issue 1 , Winter 1984 , pp. 95 - 129
Copyright
Copyright © The IO Foundation 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. For an overview of the policy debate in the 1930s, see Arndt, H. W., The Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1944)Google Scholar; Landes, David S., The Unbound Prometheus: Technological Change and Industrial Development in Western Europe from 1750 to the Present (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Lewis, W. Arthur, Economic Survey, 1919–1939 (London: Allen & Unwin, 1960).Google Scholar

2. On the postwar compromise, the literature is large; see Shonfield, Andrew, Modern Capitalism (London: Oxford University Press, 1969).Google Scholar For a view from the standpoint of the role of the labor movements, see Ross, George, Lange, Peter et al. , Unions, Change and Crisis: French and Italian Union Strategy and the Political Economy (Winchester, Mass.: Allen & Unwin, 1983).Google Scholar For a view exploring the political-economic origins of postwar consociationalism and democratic corporatism, see Katzenstein, Peter, Corporatism and Change (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, forthcoming).Google Scholar

3. The classic study of German tariff conflicts is Gerschenkron, Alexander, Bread and Democracy in Germany (1943; rpt, New York: Howard Fertig, 1966).Google Scholar See also Lambi, Ivo, Tariffs and Protection in Germany (Weisbaden: Steiner, 1963).Google Scholar

4. On British tariff controversies see Brown, Benjamin, The Tariff Reform Movement in Britain, 1884–1895 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1943)Google Scholar; Aldcroft, D. H. and Richardson, H. W., The British Economy, 1870–1939 (London: Macmillan, 1969).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

5. U.S. tariff policy has had numerous treatments from different sorts of specialists. For emphasis on politics, see Schattschneider, E. E., Politics, Pressure and the Tariff (Hamden, Conn.: Archon, 1963)Google Scholar; Williams, W. A., Roots of the Modern American Empire (New York: Random House, 1969)Google Scholar as well as his other books. On economics, see Taussig, Frank, A Tariff History of the United States (New York: A. M. Kelley, 1967)Google Scholar. For a work that argues against the importance of producer-group interests, see Raymond Bauer, Ithiel de Sola Pool, and Dexter, L. A., American Business and Public Policy (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton, 1967)Google Scholar.

6. See particularly Kurth, James, “The Political Consequences of the Product Cycle: Industrial History and Political Outcomes,” International Organization 33 (Winter 1979): 1–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

7. For a very interesting treatment of the way power, preferences and interests can be interpreted, see Gaventa, John, Power and Powerlessness in Appalachia (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

8. On the relation between Keynesianism and political struggles, see Skidelsky, Robert, “The Decline of Keynesian Politics,” and Colin Crouch, “The State, Capital, and Liberal Democracy,” in Crouch, , ed., State and Economy in Contemporary Capitalism (London: Croom Helm, 1979)Google Scholar.

9. Gerschenkron, Bread and Democracy. In considering the importance of producer groups in politics, the relation between producer groups and the historical sequences of the industrial revolution, and the international elements of the product cycle, I have been strongly influenced not only by Gerschenkron but by Moore, Barrington Jr, The Social Origins of Dictatorship and Democracy (Boston: Beacon Press, 1966)Google Scholar; Kurth, “Political Consequences”; Landes, The Unbound Prometheus; and Vernon, Raymond, Sovereignty at Bay (New York: Basic Books, 1971)Google Scholar. My own views on some of these issues can be found in Gourevitch, , “International Trade, Domestic Coalitions and Liberty: Comparative Responses to the Crisis of 1873–96,” Journal of Interdisciplinary History 8 (Autumn 1977): 281–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also Gourevitch, , “The Second Image Reversed: The International Sources of Domestic Politics,” International Organization 32 (Autumn 1978): 881–912.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

10. From the vast literature on Germany before World War I, see Craig, Gordon, Germany 1866–1945 (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1978)Google Scholar, and Craig's, The Politics of the Prussian Army, 1640–1945 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1964)Google Scholar; Wehler, Hans-Ulrich, “Bismarck's Imperialism,” Past and Present 48 (1970): 119–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bohme, Helmut, “Big Business Pressure Groups and Bismarck's Turn to Protectionism, 1873–79,” Historical Journal 10 (1967): 218–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar For a view critical of these and mine, see Rogowski, Ronald, “Iron, Rye, and the Authoritarian Coalition in Germany after 1879” (Paper delivered at the APSA meeting, Denver, September 1982).Google Scholar

11. Abraham, David, The Collapse of the Weimar Republic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1981)Google Scholar; this contains an extremely useful and interesting account of the substantive policy goals of different interest groups and the possible combinations of them. See also Feldman, Gerald, Iron and Steel in the German Inflation, 1916–23 (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1977)Google Scholar.

12. In his very important recent book on the political economy of Weimar, Collapse of the Weimar Republic, David Abraham has mapped out the pattern of different social groups' preferences on a range of issues, economic and other, showing the terms of trade along which alliances could occur. His work resonates strongly with the approach taken here and with the modeling in Ferguson's, Thomas “From Normalcy to New Deal,” International Organization 38 (Winter 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

13. In addition to the classical treatments of the mass electorate (Lipset, S. M., Political Man [Garden City, N. Y.: Doubleday, 1963]Google Scholar, and Haberle, Rudolf, From Democracy to Nazism [Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1970])Google Scholar, see Hamilton, Richard, Who Voted for Hitler (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1982)CrossRefGoogle Scholar, for a treatment stressing the social diversity of the Nazi electorate and the importance of Nazi organizational skills.

14. Woytinski, Vladimir, Stormy Passage (New York: Vanguard, 1961)Google Scholar.

15. Kurth, “Political Consequences”; Borkin, Joseph, The Crime and Punishment of I. G. Farben (New York: Free Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

16. On business see Feldman, Gerald, “The Social and Economic Policies of German Big Business, 1918–29,” American Historical Review 75 (October 1969): 47–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and several works by Turner, Henry Ashby Jr: “Big Business and the Rise of Hitler,” American Historical Review 75 (October 1969): 56–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar; “Emil Kirdorf and the Nazi Party,” Central European History 1 (December 1968): 324–44Google Scholar; “Hitler's Secret Pamphlet for Industrialists, 1927,” Journal of Modern History 11 (September 1968): 348–74Google Scholar; “The Ruhrlade, Secret Cabinet of Heavy Industry in the Weimar Republic,” Central European History 3 (September 1970): 195–228Google Scholar; and Stresemann and the Politics of the Weimar Republic (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1963)Google Scholar.

17. Heyl, John D., “Hitler's Economic Thought: A Reappraisal,” Central European History 6 (March 1973): 83–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Amdt, Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties; Milward, Alan S., “Fascism and the Economy,” in Laqueur, Walter, ed., Fascism, A Reader's Guide: Analyses, Interpretations, Bibliography (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976)Google Scholar.

18. See Kindleberger, Charles, The World in Depression, 1929–1939 (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1973)Google Scholar.

19. Because Ferguson's “From Normalcy to New Deal” analyzes the U.S. case in detail, treatment here will be brief. The two articles reinforce each other.

20. Walter Burnham, Dean, Critical Elections and the Mainsprings of the American Party System (New York: Norton, 1970)Google Scholar.

21. The literature on the New Deal is, of course, immense. In addition to the well-known materials, I have found particularly useful some newer work by Ferguson, Thomas: “From Normalcy to New Deal,” and his Critical Realignment: The Fall of the House of Morgan and the Origins of the New Deal (New York: Oxford University Press, forthcoming)Google Scholar; and by Theda Skocpol, who has coauthored several articles with a stress on institutions; see “Political Responses to Capitalist Crisis: Neo-Marxist Theories of the State and the Case of the New Deal,” Politics and Society 10, 2 (1980)Google Scholar; Skocpol, and Finegold, Kenneth, “State Capacity and Economic Intervention in the Early New Deal,” Political Science Quarterly 97 (Summer 1982): 255–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skocpol and Margaret Weir, “State Structures, Political Coalitions, and the Possibilities for Social Keynesianism: Responses to the Great Depression in Sweden and the United States” (forthcoming).

22. Koblik, Steven, ed., Sweden's Development from Poverty to Affluence, trans. by Johnson, Joanne (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

23. The controversy about whether their ideas were derived from the British discussion of the late 1920s, led by Keynes, or were a native product derived from socialist concepts of underconsumption and Swedish economists is not relevant here.

24. Dahmen, Erik, Entrepreneurial Activity and the Development of Swedish Industry, 1919–1939, trans. by Leijonhvud, Axel (Homewood, Ill.: Richard D. Irwin, 1970)Google Scholar. This is a particularly interesting economic history for the purposes of the approach taken here, because it is one of the few that disaggregates by industrial sector.

25. For critical evaluations of the course of Swedish policy in the 1930s, see Gustafson, Bo, “A Perennial of Doctrinal History: Keynes and the ‘Stockholm’ School,” Economy and History 16 (1973): 114–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Tilton, T. A., “A Swedish Road to Socialism: Ernst Wigforss and the Ideological Foundations of Swedish Social Democracy,” American Political Science Review 73 (June 1979): 505–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Winch, Donald, “The Keynesian Revolution in Sweden,” Journal of Political Economy 74 (April 1966): 168–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Uhr, Carl G., “The Emergence of the ‘New Economies’ in Sweden: A Review of a Study by Otto Steiger,” History of Political Economy 5 (Spring 1973): 243–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and various articles by Jonung, Lars based on his current research: “Knut Wicksell's Norm of Price Stabilization and Swedish Monetary Policy in the 1930s,” Journal of Monetary Economics 5 (1979)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and “The Depression in Sweden and the United States: A Comparison of Causes and Policies,” in Karl Brunner, ed., The Great Depression Revisited (Boston: Martinus Nijhoff, 1981)Google Scholar.

26. From the large literature on Sweden in this period, note: Andrew Martin, “The Dynamics of Change in a Keynesian Political Economy: The Swedish Case and Its Implications,” in Crouch, State and Economy, Koblik, Sweden's Development; Dahmen, Entrepreneurial Activity, Heckscher, Eli F., An Economic History of Sweden, trans. by Ohlin, Goran (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1954)Google Scholar; Korpi, Walter, The Working Class in Welfare Capitalism: Work, Unions, and Politics in Sweden (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1978)Google Scholar; Lewin, Leif, Jansson, Bo, and Sorbom, Dag, The Swedish Electorate, 1887–1968 (Stockholm: Almquist & Wiksell, 1972)Google Scholar; Lindbeck, Assar, Swedish Economic Policy (London: Macmillan, 1975)Google Scholar; Montgomery, Arthur, How Sweden Overcame the Depression, 1930–1933 (1938; rpt, New York: Johnson, 1972)Google Scholar; Soderpalm, Sven Anders, Direktorsklubben-Storindustrin i svensk politik under 1930- och 40 -talen (Zenit: Raben & Sjorgen, 1976)Google Scholar; Tingsten, Herbert, The Swedish Social Democrats: Their Ideological Development, trans. by Frankel, Greta and Howard-Rosen, Patricia (Totowa, N.J.: Bedminster Press, 1973)Google Scholar; Nyman, Olle, Svensk parlamentarism 1932–1936: Fran minoritets parlamentarism till majoritetskoalition (Uppsala: Almquist & Wiksell, 1947)Google Scholar.

27. Arndt, Economic Lessons of the Nineteen-Thirties; Aldcroft, Derek H. and Richardson, Harry W., Building in the British Economy between the Wars (London: Allen & Unwin, 1968)Google Scholar; Richardson, Harry W., Economic Recovery in Britain, 1932–39 (London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson, 1967)Google Scholar; Youngson, Alexander, The British Economy, 1920–57 (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1960)Google Scholar; Winch, Donald, Economics and Policy: A Historical Study (New York: Walker, 1969)Google Scholar; Hancock, Keith J., “Reduction of Unemployment as a Problem of Public Policy, 1920–29,” Economic History Review, 2d ser., 15 (December 1962): 328–43Google Scholar, and “Unemployment and the Economists in the 1920s,” Economica, n.s., 27 (1960): 305–21Google Scholar; Kahn, Alfred, Great Britain in the World Economy (New York: Columbia University Press, 1946)Google Scholar; Strange, Susan, Sterling and British Policy (London: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar.

28. Bullock, Alan, The Life and Times of Ernest Bevin, vol. 1 (London: Heinemann, 1960)Google Scholar; Skidelsky, Robert, Politicians and the Slump (London: Macmillan, 1967)Google Scholar.

29. Kavanagh, Dennis A., “Crisis and Management and Incremental Adaptation in British Politics: The 1931 Crisis of the British Party System,” in Almond, Gabriel et al. , ed., Crisis, Choice, and Change: Historical Studies of Political Development (Boston: Little, Brown, 1973)Google Scholar.

30. Frank Longstreth, “The City, Industry and the State,” in Crouch, State and Economy, Gilpin, Robert, United States Power and the Multinational Corporation (New York: Basic Books, 1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Blank, Stephen, “Britain: The Politics of Foreign Economic Policy,” in Katzenstein, Peter, ed., Between Power and Plenty (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Beer, Samuel H., British Politics in the Collectivist Age (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1965)Google Scholar.

31. Goguel, Francois, La politique des partis sous la Hie République (Paris: Seuil, 1946)Google Scholar.

32. Auge-Laribe, Michel, La politique agricole de la France (Paris: PUF, 1950)Google Scholar; Warner, Charles. K., The Winegrowers of France and the Government since 1875 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1960)Google Scholar.

33. Dupeux, Georges, Le Front populaire et les élections de 1939 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1959)Google Scholar.

34. Ehrmann, Henry, Organized Business in France (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1957)Google Scholar; Kuisel, Richard, Ernest Mercier: French Technocrat (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

35. Bouvier, Jean, “Un débat toujours ouvert: la politique économique du Front populaire,” Le mouvement social no. 54 (01-03 1966): 175–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Guérin, Daniel, Front populaire, révolution manquée, rev. ed. (Paris: Maspéro, 1970)Google Scholar; Kalecki, M., “Lessons of the Blum Experiment,” Economic Journal 48 (03 1938): 26–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Lefranc, Georges, Histoire du Front populaire, 2d ed. (Paris: Payot, 1974)Google Scholar; Marjolin, Robert, “Reflections on the Blum Experiment,” Economica, n.s., 5 (May 1938): 177–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sauvy, Alfred, Histoire économique de la France entre les deux guerres (Paris: Fayard, 1967), vol. 2: 1931–39Google Scholar, and also some interesting articles in vol. 4.

36. Brower, Daniel, The New Jacobins: The French Communist Party and the Popular Front (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Bodin, Louis and Touchard, Jean, Le Front populaire de 1936 (Paris: Armand Colin, 1961)Google Scholar; Greene, Nathanael, Crisis and Decline: The French Socialist Party in the Popular Front Era (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Broué, Pierre and Dorey, Nicole, “Critiques de gauche et opposition révolutionnaire au Front populaire (1936–38),” Le mouvement social no. 54 (01-03 1966): 91–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Colton, Joel, Léon Blum (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1966)Google Scholar; Ehrmann, Henry, French Labor from Popular Front to Liberation (New York: Oxford University Press, 1947)Google Scholar; Lacouture, Jean, Léon Blum (Paris: Seuil, 1977)Google Scholar.

37. On economic policy and nationalism in the 1930s, see Hirschman, Albert, National Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1945)Google Scholar; Kaiser, David, Economic Diplomacy and the Causes of the Second World War (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1980)Google Scholar.

38. See the many interesting chapters in Berger, Suzanne, ed., Organizing Interests in Western Europe (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1981)Google Scholar.

39. For an interpretation of postwar economic policy that stresses the structure and number of interest groups (as opposed to their specific substance) see Olson, Mancur, The Rise and Decline of Nations (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1982)Google Scholar. For an interpretation of links between the general approach to policy and the social implications of technology, see Michael Piore and Charles Sabel's forthcoming book, tentatively entitled “The Industrial Divide: Technology and the Institutions of Coordination and Stabilization in Advanced Industrial Capitalism.”