Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T00:23:12.626Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

U.S. Supreme Court Order Denying Review of Mora v. Mcnamara*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1969

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reproduced from the Journal of the Supreme Court of the United States, November 6, 1967. Asterisks indicate omission of material relating to other cases.]

References

1 Hearings on S. Res. No. 151, 90th Cong., 1st Sess. (1967).

2 [1955] 6 U. S. T. 81, T. I. A. S. No. 3170.

3 78 Stat. 384.

4 Hearings, on S. Res. No. 151, supra, n. 1, at 145.

5 Id., at 145.

6 Id., at 80–81.

7 15 Papers of Jefferson 397 (Boyd, ed., Princeton 1955)Google Scholar. In the Federalist No. 69, at 465 (Cooke ed. 1961), Hamilton stated:

“The President is to be Commander in Chief of the army and navy of the United States. In this respect his authority would be nominally the same with that of the King of Great Britain, but in substance much inferior to it. It would amount to nothing more than the supreme command and direction of the military and naval forces, as first General and Admiral of the Confederacy; while that of the British King extends to the declaring of war and to the raising and regulating of fleets and armies; all which by the Constitution under consideration would appertain to the Legislature.”