Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-25T05:52:15.567Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

United States: District Court for the Southern District of New York Decision in Aerotrade V. Banque Nationale De La Republique D'haiti (Sovereign Immunity; Commercial Contracts)*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 April 2017

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

[Reprinted from the text provided by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

[The Court’s Decision in Aerotrade v. Republic of Haiti appears at I.L.M. page 969.]

References

1 Aerotrade, Inc. v. Republic of Haiti, Civil No. 73–3587 (S.D.N.Y., May 24, 1974).

2 See Bradford v. Amsterdam, 424 F.2d 282 (2d Cir. 1970); Rader v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins. Co., 255 F.2d 404 (2d Cir. 1958); Ralph Hochman & Co. v. Fort Stanwix Mfg. Co., 284 F. Supp. 1000, 1001 n.2 (N.D.N.Y. 1968); Wallach v. Lieberman, 219 F. Supp. 247, 248 (S.D.N.Y. 1963), aff’d. 366 F.2d 254 (2d Cir. 1966).

3 N.Y.C.P.L.R. § 6212 (McKinney 1963).

4 See Glaser v. North American Uranium & Oil Corp., 222 F.2d 552, 554 (2d Cir. 1955); Reeder v. Mastercraft Electronics Corp., 297 F. Supp. 815, 818 (S.D.N.Y. 1969); Worldwide Carriers, Ltd. v. Aris S.S. Co., 301 F. Supp. 64, 66 (S.D.N.Y. 1968). See also Fed. R. Civ. P. 64.

5 Miller Bros. Const. Co. v. Thew Shovel Co., 248 App. Div. 150, 288 N.Y.S. 944 (1936); Pfaltz & Bauer, Inc. v. Wiener, 181 App. Div. 793, 169 N.Y.S. 233 (1918); 7A J. Weinstein, H. Korn & A. Miller, New York Civil Practice Paragraph 6212.02 at 62-81 to 62-83 (1972).

6 Cf. Georgis v. Giocalas, 225 App. Div. 577, 233 N.Y.S. 16 (1929).

7 Cf. Deyo v. Hudson, 225 N.Y. 602, 122 N.E. 635 (1919); Adams v. Gillig, 199 N.Y. 314, 92 N.E. 670 (1910).

8 Cf. Waterman-Bic Pen Corp. v. L. E. Waterman Pen Co., 19 Misc. 2d 421, 190 N.Y.S.2d 48 (Sup. Ct.), rev’d on other grounds, 8 App.Div. 2d 378, 187 N.Y.S.2d 872 (1958); Elliot v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co., 11 Misc. 2d 133, 171 N.Y.S.2d 217 (City Ct. 1957), aff’d, 11 Misc.2d 136, 179 N.Y.S.2d 136 (Sup. Ct. 1958).

9 § 1314 (McKinney Supp. 1973).

10 411 F.2d 812, 815–17 n.4 (2d Cir.), cert, denied, 396 U.S. 840 (1969).