Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-c9gpj Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-12T05:32:12.202Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes Tribunal: Decision on Jurisdiction in Amco V. Republic of Indonesia (Resubmitted Case)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Judicial and Similar Proceedings
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 27 , Issue 5 , September 1988 , pp. 1281 - 1313
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* Reproduced from the text provided to International Legal Materials by Coudert Brothers, attorneys for the claimants. In submitting it to I.L.M., they stated: “We believe that the Tribunal's Decision is the product of substantial study by eminent international jurist and that its publication will not only be of interest to the international bar, but will serve generally to advance international law and order, and specifically the purposes of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes between States and Nationals of Other States.”

1 Article 52(1)(b), 52(1)(d) and 52(1)(c).It has not been suggested that other grounds in Article 52 that the Tribunal was not properly constituted or that there was corruption-fall for consideration.

2 Numbering added by the Tribunal for convenience of reference.

3 Indonesia confirmed to the Tribunal on March 11, 1988 that a typographical error in its claim should be amended to read as here shown.