Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-2xdlg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-05T01:43:28.410Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes: Desert Line Projects Llc V. Republic of Yemen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 February 2017

Eckhard R. Hellbeck
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
International Legal Material
Information
International Legal Materials , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , February 2009 , pp. 79 - 128
Copyright
Copyright © American Society of International Law 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

End notes

* Eckhard Hellbeck is an attorney with White & Case LLP in Washington, D.C. His practice focuses on international dispute resolution, in particular investment treaty arbitration.

* This text was reproduced and reformatted from the text appearing at the text appearing at Arbitration Database website: (visited February 10, 2009)< <http://arbitration.fr/resources/ICSID-ARB-05-17.pdf>>

1 Desert Line Projects LLC v. Republic of Yemen, ICSID Case No. ARB/05/17, Award (Feb. 6, 2008), at< http://icsid.worldbank.org/ICSID/FrontServlet?requestType=CasesRH&actionVal=showDoc&docId=DC791_En&caseId=C62> [hereinafter Desert Line Award].

2 Id. ¶ 193.

3 Id. ¶ 215.

4 Id. ¶ 92.

5 Id. ¶¶ 100-01 (citing the preamble of the Oman-Yemen BIT).

6 Id. ¶ 101.

7 The Tribunal here made reference to the decisions of other ICSID tribunals interpreting the clause “according to its laws and regulations” found in the definition of the protected investment in many BITs. See Desert Line Award, supra note 1, ¶ 104 (citing Inceysa Vallisoletana S.L. v. Republic of El Salvador, ICSID Case No. ARB/03/26, Award (Aug. 2, 2006), at<http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/Inceysa_Vallisoletana_en_000.pdf>; Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines, ICSID Case No. ARB/ 03/25, Award (Aug. 16, 2007), at< http://ita.law.uvic.ca/documents/FraportAward.pdf>).

8 Desert Line Award, supra note 1, ¶ 106.

9 Id. ¶ 119.

10 Id. ¶¶ 172-73 (citing Diffe´rend Industrie Vicentine Elettro- Mecchaniche (T.V.E.M.), 13 U.N. Rep. Int. Arb. Awards 324 (1952); Diffe´rend Wagon-Citernes, 13 U.N. Rep. Int. Arb. Awards 212 (1950); Gowen&Copeland case, in 4 John Bassett Moore, History and Digest of International Arbitrations to Which the United States Has Been a Party 3354 (1898)).

11 Desert Line Award, supra note 1, ¶ 171.

12 Id. ¶ 174.

13 Id. ¶ 181.

14 Id. ¶ 186.

15 Id. ¶ 194.

16 Id. ¶ 286.

17 Id. ¶ 289.

18 Id. ¶ 290.

19 Id. (citing Lusitania, U.S. v. Germany, Nov. 1923, 7 U.N. Rep. Int. Arb. Awards 32, 42 (1956)).