Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-ndjvl Total loading time: 0.552 Render date: 2022-05-20T09:03:14.076Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2021

Brendan Plant*
Affiliation:
Brendan Plant is Hopkins-Parry Fellow in Law at Downing College and Fellow of the Lauterpacht Centre for International Law at the University of Cambridge, United Kingdom. He is a pupil barrister at Twenty Essex chambers in London.

Extract

On December 18, 2020, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) handed down its decision on the jurisdiction of the Court in the case concerning the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela). By a 14–2 majority, the Court ruled that it has jurisdiction to decide certain elements of the application submitted unilaterally by Guyana against Venezuela, while it concluded unanimously that it lacks jurisdiction over other aspects of Guyana's application. Having established jurisdiction over certain elements of Guyana's application, the ICJ will now proceed to hear the merits of the claims.

Type
International Legal Documents
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The American Society of International Law

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Endnote 16 has been corrected since original publication. A separate notice detailing this change has also been published (DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2022.16).

References

1 Award regarding the Boundary between the Colony of British Guiana and the United States of Venezuela, October 3, 1899, RIAA, vol. XXVIII, pp. 331–40.

2 Severo Mallet-Prevost, Memorandum Left with Judge Schoenrich Not to be Made Public Except at His Discretion after My Death (1949) 43 A.J.I.L. 528–30.

3 Agreement to resolve the controversy over the frontier between Venezuela and British Guiana, signed at Geneva on February 17, 1966, U.N.T.S. No. 8192.

4 Arbitral Award of 3 Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.), Judgment on Jurisdiction (Dec. 18, 2020), ¶¶ 23–28.

5 Id., ¶¶ 64–65.

6 Id., ¶ 74.

7 Id., ¶ 99.

8 Id., ¶ 86.

9 Id., ¶ 113.

10 Id., ¶ 115.

11 Id., ¶¶ 135–36.

12 Id., ¶ 137.

13 News reports indicate that officials from the United States and Bahamas have expressed support. For the United States, see: US supports ICJ's decision to settle Guyana-Venezuela border dispute, Jamaica Observer (Jan. 12, 2021), https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/news/us-supports-icj-s-decision-to-settle-guyana-venezuela-border-dispute_211915?profile=1031; for the Bahamas, see: Bahamas supports Guyana in border controversy with Venezuela, Guyana Chronicle (Jan. 18, 2021), https://guyanachronicle.com/2021/01/18/bahamas-supports-guyana-in-border-controversy-with-venezuela.

15 Dissenting Opinion of Judge Abraham, ¶ 17; Dissenting Opinion of Judge Bennouna, ¶ 11.

16 Simón Gómez and Moisés A. Montiel Mogollón, A Commentary on the Arbitral Award of 3 October 1899 (Guyana v. Venezuela) jurisdiction ruling: The road to hell is paved with good intentions, Opinio Juris (Feb. 19, 2021), http://opiniojuris.org/2021/02/19/a-commentary-on-the-arbitral-award-of-3-october-1899-guyana-v-venezuela-jurisdiction-ruling-the-road-to-hell-is-paved-with-good-intentions.

17 This was established in Decree No. 4.415, published in the Official Gazette No. 42.046, dated January 13, 2021, http://www.mppre.gob.ve/en/2021/01/07/president-maduro-venezuelan-atlantic-front.

18 Caricom concerned about Venezuela's plan to establish territory in disputed region of Guyana, Jamaica Observer (Jan. 12, 2021), https://www.jamaicaobserver.com/latestnews/Caricom_concerned_about_Venezuelas_plan_to_establish_territory?profile=0.

19 Organization of American States, Statement from OAS General Secretariat on Illegal Detention of Guyanese Vessels by Venezuela (Jan. 27, 2021), https://www.oas.org/en/media_center/press_release.asp?sCodigo=E-004/21.

Linked content

Please note a has been issued for this article.

Save article to Kindle

To save this article to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)
Available formats
×

Save article to Dropbox

To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)
Available formats
×

Save article to Google Drive

To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Arbitral Award of Oct. 3, 1899 (Guy. v. Venez.) (Decision on Jurisdiction) (I.C.J.)
Available formats
×
×

Reply to: Submit a response

Please enter your response.

Your details

Please enter a valid email address.

Conflicting interests

Do you have any conflicting interests? *