Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-fmk2r Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-24T02:38:20.709Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Response to Eric Arnesen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2002

Eric Foner
Affiliation:
Columbia University

Abstract

Eric Arnesen's essay highlights some real weaknesses in the burgeoning literature of whiteness and raises serious questions about the use of whiteness as a category of historical analysis. It effectively highlights the ambiguity of the concept and the way it tends to homogenize individuals who differ among themselves on numerous issues, including the definition of race. Moreover, the notion that European immigrants had to “become” white ignores a longstanding legal structure, dating back to the time of the Constitution, that incorporated these immigrants within the category of white American. Nonetheless, Arnesen fails to take account of some of the positive contributions of this literature, or to locate its popularity in the political and racial context of the late twentieth century. Rather than being abandoned, the concept of whiteness must be refined and historicized.

Type
SCHOLARLY CONTROVERSY: WHITENESS AND THE HISTORIANSÕ IMAGINATION
Copyright
© 2001 The International Labor and Working-Class History Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)