Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-mwx4w Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-03T15:03:39.873Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 January 2004

Peter Winn
Affiliation:
Tufts University

Extract

Some three decades have elapsed since feminists turned the scholarly spotlight on the previously ignored historical experience of half the world's population. Nearly two decades have transpired since the publication of Joan Scott's pathbreaking essay on gender and history.Joan Scott, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” American Historical Review 91, 5 (1986). See also Joan Scott's article “On Language, Gender, and Working-Class History,” International Labor and Working-Class History 31 (1987): 1–13, and her reflections on gender as a category of historical analysis in “Preface to the Revised Edition,” in Gender and the Politics of History (New York, 2000), especially ix–xii. Since then, women's history and increasingly sophisticated forms of gender analysis have altered understandings of and approaches to many fields of history.

Type
Labor History After the Gender Turn
Copyright
© 2003 The International Labor and Working-Class History Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)